Hayfield Football Coach Fired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just feel so bad for the kids in this big mess. Terrible role models leading them through this and them seeing this as "the way". Terrible for all the kids that left Hayfield, for all the kids at Hayfield not involved in this mess but will be impacted, and for all of the kids at other schools impacted by these actions in so many ways. I would also not be surprised if we learn schools that previously offered some of the Hayfield players (like VA Tech) remove their scholarship offer due to involvement. That is a shame as likely not fully the fault of the kids but many times schools will remove scholarship offers as they learn about character issues and flaws of the kid's parents, environment they were part of, etc. I am definitely close to many of the coaches and recruiters and see this happen more than you think. Hope that does not happen here for the sake of the kids but it could and might in this case. What a shame!

This is a half and half thing though

You truly believe the other 50-60 players didn’t know about ineligible players?

I feel bad for kids because a lot of them got screwed. I feel bad because they were bullied and coerced into not standing up for the right thing.

I don’t feel bad because we’re all I feel bad for the kids who had no problem beating the shit out of other teams 633-13 and being 9-1. And knowing those results were all because the team had ineligible players.

Somewhere is a line and people crossed over even if they were bullied and threatened if they said something.

Do I expect high school kids to be morally and ethically right and always do the right thing. No. But we also profess if you see something say something

When was saying something the wrong decision? So sure I feel bad for the kids but I also don’t feel bad for them either. Doing the right thing is not always the easy thing.

And spare me the but they’re high schoolers with less developed brains stuff, trust me I said six weeks ago if hayfield won the whole damn thing everything would be forgiven so even I the pontificating adult was wrong

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:Bit of an update:

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/exclusive-hayfield-athletic-director-resigns-effective-dec-2-amid-widening-scandal/article_4d1b1cae-ac2a-11ef-be0f-23f1dd3c4b5e.html

BTW, I love this line: "marking the first resignation in a growing scandal..."

Asra knows she's going to spill the dirt on everyone and is just biding her time...

A Nike contract?!? for a public HS?

An exclusive deal is highly unusual for a public high school. Possibly illegal? Maybe. But not 100% sure.

Lol

I think the students at the St. John’s Academy in NW DC (independent high school) are only allowed to wear Under Amor gear due to the exclusive deal with the company’s CEO who is an alum. That’s one of the problems with these exclusive athletic sponsorships at the prep school level.

The UA deal with St. John's College High School (that's the name of the school you are referencing) doesn't forbid kids from wearing Nike, Adidas etc. If that were the case the school uniforms would have to be UA and I am almost certain they are Flynn O'Hara. The UA deal is specific to the sports teams and the school store. The school store is only allowed to sell UA clothing unless UA doesn't make the type of clothing being sold (e.g. ties) and the athletics teams are only allowed to wear UA uniforms, warmups etc. It makes sense for a UA to make a deal like this with an SJC as SJC is, to HS sports fans, a national brand and good at many sports (and it doesn't hurt that UA's founder is an SJC alum). I would be shocked if Hayfield got a deal that looks even remotely like that. Nike would keep an Overton at a very far distance.

Thanks for the explanation. Looking into this more, Nike has sponsorships with public high schools, especially in Oregon where the HQ is. But both girls and boys sports should get equal treatment, and it appears Nike is only providing uniforms for Hayfield’s popular boys sports at the moment, with the other sports in the back of the queue.

Maybe Nike could make orange prison jumpsuits with the swish logo for Overton, the AD and everyone who had knowledge of the welfare fraud?

The AD is likely in a country that does not extradite to the US.

Has he already moved? He looks young but not young enough to be able to jet off to a foreign country with a couple weeks' notice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:Bit of an update:

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/exclusive-hayfield-athletic-director-resigns-effective-dec-2-amid-widening-scandal/article_4d1b1cae-ac2a-11ef-be0f-23f1dd3c4b5e.html

BTW, I love this line: "marking the first resignation in a growing scandal..."



Asra knows she's going to spill the dirt on everyone and is just biding her time...

A Nike contract?!? for a public HS?

An exclusive deal is highly unusual for a public high school. Possibly illegal? Maybe. But not 100% sure.

Lol

I think the students at the St. John’s Academy in NW DC (independent high school) are only allowed to wear Under Amor gear due to the exclusive deal with the company’s CEO who is an alum. That’s one of the problems with these exclusive athletic sponsorships at the prep school level.

The UA deal with St. John's College High School (that's the name of the school you are referencing) doesn't forbid kids from wearing Nike, Adidas etc. If that were the case the school uniforms would have to be UA and I am almost certain they are Flynn O'Hara. The UA deal is specific to the sports teams and the school store. The school store is only allowed to sell UA clothing unless UA doesn't make the type of clothing being sold (e.g. ties) and the athletics teams are only allowed to wear UA uniforms, warmups etc. It makes sense for a UA to make a deal like this with an SJC as SJC is, to HS sports fans, a national brand and good at many sports (and it doesn't hurt that UA's founder is an SJC alum). I would be shocked if Hayfield got a deal that looks even remotely like that. Nike would keep an Overton at a very far distance.

Thanks for the explanation. Looking into this more, Nike has sponsorships with public high schools, especially in Oregon where the HQ is. But both girls and boys sports should get equal treatment, and it appears Nike is only providing uniforms for Hayfield’s popular boys sports at the moment, with the other sports in the back of the queue.

Maybe Nike could make orange prison jumpsuits with the swish logo for Overton, the AD and everyone who had knowledge of the welfare fraud?

The AD is likely in a country that does not extradite to the US.

Is that a fact about no extradition?

Oh please. Just stop with this stupidity. Extradition? Go back to watching Law & Order.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

Since they're not playing a home game tonight, hopefully the boosters will make good use of all of that food that is being wasted.

What wasted food? The football team meal comes from the "team mom's" fundraising account, not the boosters. Chips, candy, cokes, etc is all prepacked and will keep for basketball season.

Whatever the case, they shouldn't let the homeless student athletes go without during Thanksgiving.

Are you really that obtuse? They are not homeless. They have perfectly good homes in PWC.

That hasn't been proven. You really want everybody to believe that they commuted on the daily from PWC to Hayfield? No less at the whim of whatever their schedule was?

People literally do this for TJ every day and much further. We have kids that carpool for football to Loudoun County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

Since they're not playing a home game tonight, hopefully the boosters will make good use of all of that food that is being wasted.

What wasted food? The football team meal comes from the "team mom's" fundraising account, not the boosters. Chips, candy, cokes, etc is all prepacked and will keep for basketball season.

Whatever the case, they shouldn't let the homeless student athletes go without during Thanksgiving.

Are you really that obtuse? They are not homeless. They have perfectly good homes in PWC.

That hasn't been proven. You really want everybody to believe that they commuted on the daily from PWC to Hayfield? No less at the whim of whatever their schedule was?

People literally do this for TJ every day and much further. We have kids that carpool for football to Loudoun County

We? So your kids go to LC for football? Tell us more.

[Anonymous]

Bumping, because it was getting too far down the “Recent topics” page.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

Since they're not playing a home game tonight, hopefully the boosters will make good use of all of that food that is being wasted.

What wasted food? The football team meal comes from the "team mom's" fundraising account, not the boosters. Chips, candy, cokes, etc is all prepacked and will keep for basketball season.

Whatever the case, they shouldn't let the homeless student athletes go without during Thanksgiving.

Are you really that obtuse? They are not homeless. They have perfectly good homes in PWC.

That hasn't been proven. You really want everybody to believe that they commuted on the daily from PWC to Hayfield? No less at the whim of whatever their schedule was?

People literally do this for TJ every day and much further. We have kids that carpool for football to Loudoun County

We? So your kids go to LC for football? Tell us more.

DP but I drive about 15-20 miles my kids sport and have for years. It’s not uncommon for club sports or private schools. I’m not sure why you think no one would drive that far for a school or a sport.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:

FrankWinston wrote:Bit of an update:

https://www.fairfaxtimes.com/articles/exclusive-hayfield-athletic-director-resigns-effective-dec-2-amid-widening-scandal/article_4d1b1cae-ac2a-11ef-be0f-23f1dd3c4b5e.html

BTW, I love this line: "marking the first resignation in a growing scandal..."



Asra knows she's going to spill the dirt on everyone and is just biding her time...

A Nike contract?!? for a public HS?

An exclusive deal is highly unusual for a public high school. Possibly illegal? Maybe. But not 100% sure.

Lol

I think the students at the St. John’s Academy in NW DC (independent high school) are only allowed to wear Under Amor gear due to the exclusive deal with the company’s CEO who is an alum. That’s one of the problems with these exclusive athletic sponsorships at the prep school level.

The UA deal with St. John's College High School (that's the name of the school you are referencing) doesn't forbid kids from wearing Nike, Adidas etc. If that were the case the school uniforms would have to be UA and I am almost certain they are Flynn O'Hara. The UA deal is specific to the sports teams and the school store. The school store is only allowed to sell UA clothing unless UA doesn't make the type of clothing being sold (e.g. ties) and the athletics teams are only allowed to wear UA uniforms, warmups etc. It makes sense for a UA to make a deal like this with an SJC as SJC is, to HS sports fans, a national brand and good at many sports (and it doesn't hurt that UA's founder is an SJC alum). I would be shocked if Hayfield got a deal that looks even remotely like that. Nike would keep an Overton at a very far distance.

Thanks for the explanation. Looking into this more, Nike has sponsorships with public high schools, especially in Oregon where the HQ is. But both girls and boys sports should get equal treatment, and it appears Nike is only providing uniforms for Hayfield’s popular boys sports at the moment, with the other sports in the back of the queue.

Maybe Nike could make orange prison jumpsuits with the swish logo for Overton, the AD and everyone who had knowledge of the welfare fraud?

The AD is likely in a country that does not extradite to the US.

Is that a fact about no extradition?

Oh please. Just stop with this stupidity. Extradition? Go back to watching Law & Order.

Why so touchy? This is exactly why I was challenging the PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question:

The title of this thread is the coach was fired...

Was Overton fired? I've never seen that in the news reports.

Overton should be fired.

It was originally about the druggie/possible
Pedophile Hayfield
coach who was trying to give children drugs. He was arrested and fired.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

14 guesses….

There were 31 transfers so thats 31 possibilities

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

14 guesses….

There were 31 transfers so thats 31 possibilities

DP. Only 14 claimed to be homeless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

14 guesses….

There were 31 transfers so thats 31 possibilities

DP. Only 14 claimed to be homeless.

Only 2.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder which two were homeless.

14 guesses….

There were 31 transfers so thats 31 possibilities

DP. Only 14 claimed to be homeless.

Only 2 did. Go back and read. Or google the FXTimes article

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Team white supremacy wins again.

Team with only the race card to play strikes again. The fact this is the only card that continues to be played speaks volumes.

White supremacy was a thing years ago, but today's racism is different. The cheating by Overton and his people makes them victims, but the white preppy AD had to flee the country to avoid hanging. Welcome to 2024.

You are actually saying that now in 2024, racism against black people is a thing of the past and the new victim of racism is the poor white male? You are absolutely delusional. White privelege on full display right here.

DP. From what I’ve heard, many in the Hayfield community do not think very highly of the director of activities who abruptly resigned and fled overseas.

Well how highly does the white community think of him?

[Anonymous]

https://www.change.org/p/hold-fcps-accountable-taxpayers-demand-investigation-transparency-and-reparations?signed=true&fbclid=IwY2xjawGzbrRleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHdDhNYnc7XDvumnLAErtF8kMc1zrJZOHMB-GEueG5rpU6Y5aXLzvhRnsCw_aem_z8q3sz879cear4X9zLFB6Q