Joe is out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump was right about slow Joe.

Trump is a flaming lying psychopath. Joe may have been slow and Trump is evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.

Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.

Clearly. That's why you and the trumpers are running around on social media rn like chickens with your head cut off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala has never had kids.

That alone is a massive turn off to a huge number of voters. She's never known what it is like to be a mother of her own kids and had to make sacrifices to make a career and family work.

A presidential candidate who doesn't have kids is just unelectable in this country. It's the way it is.

How do you know why she didn't have kids, you f.cking ghoul?

DP
The why isn’t relevant. It’s not even mentioned in PP’s post.

Yes, it is. Because if it's an infertility issue, people very much relate to that. And considering Project 2025 is doing away with IVF, she will remind women, no worries.

You completely missed the point PP was making. Oh well.

[Anonymous]

So depressing. It is like people are sending condolences as if the president were dead not stepping aside. He is the lamest lame duck. Sigh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard to remember a higher-profile, more selfless act.

Shutting the barn door after the horse has escaped is selfless?

He may have cost the Dems a presidency and the country a democracy by being a stubborn fool. This is a last-ditch attempt to save downballot races

Better late than never. He could've just been stubborn and not drop out. Can you see Trump doing that? No. His ego is way too big for him to do that.

[Anonymous]

Mike Murphy: This emerging plan to anoint Kamala, and then slam her through with a fast vote before the convention is a big mistake for the Democrats. She needs to become a winner, which means winning a nomination process. That would give her a lot more strength coming out of the convention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.

Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.

Clearly. That's why you and the trumpers are running around on social media rn like chickens with your head cut off.

That’s how deliriously happy people react. Dems are so busy being offended and enraged about stuff they don’t recognize pure joy when they see it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be whitmer and Harris.

WHEELS UP HEELS UP

Why would Whitmer agree to being the VP? I thought she had her eyes on 2028.

Whitmer, Newsom, and Shapiro have all said NO THANKS to Kamala

Source?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala has never had kids.

That alone is a massive turn off to a huge number of voters. She's never known what it is like to be a mother of her own kids and had to make sacrifices to make a career and family work.

A presidential candidate who doesn't have kids is just unelectable in this country. It's the way it is.

How do you know why she didn't have kids, you f.cking ghoul?

DP
The why isn’t relevant. It’s not even mentioned in PP’s post.

Yes, it is. Because if it's an infertility issue, people very much relate to that. And considering Project 2025 is doing away with IVF, she will remind women, no worries.

You completely missed the point PP was making. Oh well.

No, I did not miss the point. Besides, she has step kids. Are you saying those are not real children?

[Anonymous]

I hope Hillary considers running for office. She’s stronger and tougher than Trump. Unlike Trump, she is sharp, seasoned, knowledgeable, and responsible. Kamala is relatively inexperienced and would make a good understudy. Trump wants too many radical reckless changes.

[Anonymous]

"Tough on Crime" attorney general versus the "I'm above the law" convicted felon?

I like it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump was right about slow Joe.

Trump is a flaming lying psychopath. Joe may have been slow and Trump is evil.

+1 slow Joe; criminal Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.

Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.

Clearly. That's why you and the trumpers are running around on social media rn like chickens with your head cut off.

That’s how deliriously happy people react. Dems are so busy being offended and enraged about stuff they don’t recognize pure joy when they see it.

LOL. Defensiveness is a sign of being deliriously happy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We will get a Jewish Male as First Lady. Xmas tree lighting will be weird.

lol. Kamala isn’t getting elected.

[Anonymous]

Literally anyone could see-- for years-- that Biden was in severe decline. Yet democratic voters didn't see it until they were instructed to. And now it's a crisis.

You're not helping anyone by refusing to deal in facts.