Joe is out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It will be whitmer and Harris.

WHEELS UP HEELS UP

Why would Whitmer agree to being the VP? I thought she had her eyes on 2028.

Whitmer, Newsom, and Shapiro have all said NO THANKS to Kamala

Source?

Doubt any of those three would have any desire to play second fiddle to Kamala Harris. They're all far more capable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hahhahaha

Dems brought this S sandwich in themselves. Say hello to President Trump, losers.

Kamala. What a joke. She's so terrible she is scaring off all donors. But the Dems backed themselves into a corner with identity politics, because it'll look so bad when they have to pass over a black female candidate (despite how terrible she is) for a white candidate.

Dems loved by the identity sword, now they will die by it because their base will be so fractured along identity lines. Kamala can't win and will get demolished. Yet Dems will also have to eat another S sandwich if they run someone else.


What terrible party leadership and strategy. It's kinda unbelievable how Trump doesn't have to do anything except let them meltdown internally. They should have not backed another Joe run in 2023 and made it clear to him that he was done in '24.

This right here tells you Trumpers are now worried. The contrast between the old guy and the young woman will be stark

DP. The PP is absolutely correct. I’m not sure how that tells you anything at all about “Trumpers.”

[Anonymous]

Guess we’re unburdened by what has been.

[Anonymous]

I THINK ILL THROW MY HAT IN THE RING

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kamala has never had kids.

That alone is a massive turn off to a huge number of voters. She's never known what it is like to be a mother of her own kids and had to make sacrifices to make a career and family work.

A presidential candidate who doesn't have kids is just unelectable in this country. It's the way it is.

How do you know why she didn't have kids, you f.cking ghoul?

https://www.vox.com/first-person/22249380/kamala-harris-children-husband-doug-cole-ella-emhoff-meena-blended-family

This article states Kamala is child free by choice.


What Kamala Harris means to women who are childfree by choice
“Momala,” and what Kamala Harris’s blended family means to people like me who have chosen not to have biological kids.
by Nayomi Munaweera
Jan 26, 2021 at 11:10 AM EST

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody will vote for a DEI candidate

Yes, yes, bring that up too. Bet those black people you claim support Trump will love it

j

So true. Let's exam the stats. What % of US population is black? And then what % vote? And Kamala heritage is not the demographic you think you are calling upon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hard to remember a higher-profile, more selfless act.

Shutting the barn door after the horse has escaped is selfless?

He may have cost the Dems a presidency and the country a democracy by being a stubborn fool. This is a last-ditch attempt to save downballot races

Better late than never. He could've just been stubborn and not drop out. Can you see Trump doing that? No. His ego is way too big for him to do that.

You’re trying to draw an equivalency between Biden’s 2024 campaign performance and Trump’s, with Trump losing that comparison?

No. Trump wouldn’t drop out — but Trump doesn’t have to. Unfortunately.

Focus on winning these races and knock of the unhelpful, “I know Trump is, but what am I?” mindset. It’s going to cost us a democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hate to say it, but Trump is far more qualified and sane to be President over this whacko

What post will his friend Hannibal Lecter have in his admin?

And could you explain to us the shark electrocution thing again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Tough on Crime" attorney general versus the "I'm above the law" convicted felon?

I like it.

Look up her link to the MN bail fund. That’s not tough on crime and it will be brought up again in the opposition campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hate to say it, but Trump is far more qualified and sane to be President over this whacko

please, you would've voted for him regardless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.

Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.

I’ve never seen Trump in pearls, but it’s astonishing you feel like manners, temperament and the tailoring of suits are critical to a job you want to elect him for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Frankly it’s brilliant of him to have waited until after the RNC. They spent all that effort demonizing the wrong candidate there. Ha!

Not really, Harris is self-explanatory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why didn’t he endorse Kamala in his letter?

Because that’s not his choice to make. He will endorse whoever will have the greatest chance of winning. Not sure that’s her.

If she isn't, kids the Black vote goodbye. To pass over her would be a galactically move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We will get a Jewish Male as First Lady. Xmas tree lighting will be weird.

Hannakah is the Festival of Lights. It will be fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hate to say it, but Trump is far more qualified and sane to be President over this whacko

What post will his friend Hannibal Lecter have in his admin?

And could you explain to us the shark electrocution thing again?

It is time for us to do what we have been doing, and that time is every day.

- Kamala