Woman missing after reporting seeing a toddler on the highway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who knows what happened

We just don't know.

One thing for sure...sucks to be her right now.

This is absolutely true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These are her public Twitter posts, stripped of the retweets (just what she posted OC): https://twitter.com/search?q=(from%3Acarleeenichole)&src=typed_query&f=live

There are several tweets in the last month referencing men who cheat, and then there is a link to a woman telling a man how she would leave him if he cheated on her. "Let me tell you something, you cheat? I'm not even finna be on no rah-dah-dadalala, I'm going to be so player ... I'm going to literally leave in the middle of the night, like a thief in the night. I'm telling you, you gonna come home one day and think everything is g-dd-mn good, and my sh-t is gonna be gone. Youre never gonna be able to locate me." Starts 0:34/1:13

Man, that's eerie. That's from about 5 days before she disappeared.

Wow, this horrible grammar and trying to go to college to be a nurse at 25 what has she been doing for the last 7 years, makes you wonder what the real story is with her mental health!! with this recent mental health episode she shouldn't be working near anyone let alone in care of others as a nurse. This should be noted and barr her from health care jobs.

She has a BA in psychology, probably just accustomed to code-switching in personal vs. professional speech. Not at all uncommon in the Black community. If it turns out to have been a hoax, or a mental health breakdown of some sort, a nursing career will be unlikely.

Multiple personalities?

Nah, it’s like people aren’t cultured at all but put a thin veneer of education/good manners for when they are at work? That’s what it is

[Anonymous]

I can’t get over the fact that some of her family tried bringing race into it, trashing the LE involved.
It’s a knee jerk reaction by now but still.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UFO abduction.

I think the toddler was a ghost.

[Anonymous]

Tawana Brawley became a nurse, so even if this did turn out to be a hoax I think that career is not necessarily a no go.

There are some stories coming out about who she was with, will surprise many if true.

Wonder what GFM will do with the funds, if it is a hoax they have not paid in the past, I think.

I read her father is an executive with a bank, family is definitely comfortable. Maybe she is the "loose cannon kid?"

[Anonymous]

I read today online that thankfully (!) she was found, alive + safe. 😃

Thank goodness.
Her boyfriend is saying that she was kidnapped which is terrible to even imagine.

I am only speculating here but am wondering if someone used their child as a pawn to get this young lady to stop her car.
If so - hope they find whoever would do such a despicable as well as outrageous act.

Since this woman apparently walked back to her home > I can only imagine many nay sayers screaming that this is likely bogus.

Only time will tell….

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who knows what happened

We just don't know.

One thing for sure...sucks to be her right now.

I couldn’t agree more.

The court of public opinion can sometimes be the worst one when it comes to judgment and blame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:it really makes no sense that a bad person would use a child to trap a random female passerbye. The odds are overwhelming that a man or even an police officer would have been the one to stop help the kid. What would the bad person do then? Ah, "nothing going on here officer. Just lost my toddler in the woods adjacent to a freeway"

I've read elsewhere that maybe she just unfortunately stumbled upon a trafficked child or some other criminal activity and thus had to be "removed" because she was a witness.

This is such a freaky case.

I was buying the trap theory, but you’re right, PP. It doesn’t seem logical.

I guess she ran into something bad and was attacked as a result. I still think she saw a child, so was a child being abused or something?

I agree this makes more sense.

Eh but no other motorists reported a child. No traffic cams picked up movement other than cars and, allegedly, her car on the shoulder. (and not the perpetrators car either).

So no perpetrator's car? Are there houses nearby? A deep culvert or drainage area for someone creepy to hide/live in?

No other motorists reported a child, but her family member on the phone said they heard Carlee ask “are you okay?” Assuming she wasn’t on drugs/hallucinating, it seems like there really was a child she was talking to.

It’s possible a child escaped a trafficking endeavor and she came across it. That would be my best guess. It’s not completely unbelievable that no one else saw the child since it was a highway at night. I know I’m not always paying attention to the side of the roadway. Other drivers could have been paying attention to all the cars around them, their passengers, the radio, etc. and at night a small child on the side of the road isn’t necessarily going to be super easy to spot. Ugh my stomach is in knots over this, I cannot imagine what her friends and family are going through. She looks like a sweet girl. Nursing student willing to stop for a child, so she’s likely a caring person. This is so unfair.

I can’t figure drugs into the timeline she’s leaving work, getting dinner, doing hallucinatory drugs and driving home one exit away from her own? It wouldn’t make sense to do the drugs before getting home. Are people thinking she was doing hallucinogenic drugs at work? It was in her food?

Her being one exit away, with her exit visible makes me think she was that close to home.

Not PP, but when I first heard the details I thought one possible explanation could be that she was having a mental break and imagined/hallucinated that she saw a child, then went off into the woods on her own. I think the only other possibilities are that she stumbled onto a dangerous situation and was abducted, or that this is staged. Of those three possibilities it seems most likely she was abducted.

I didn't see that anyone else has been this blunt, but I've wondered this, too. The items she usually wore being neatly tucked away in her purse, even moreso than the happenstance of being on the phone. I don't know. I actually hope it was staged, because that would mean she was safe.

Why would anyone stage this? Not saying it’s out of the question (and it would make sense as to how she was able to pull over vs. driving past and needing to turn around). But I don’t know why anyone would do this? Fake abduction to get money? Attention? Maybe. But it seems so out there. This whole thing is weird.

I don't know. I also don't want to speculate about why the person making the police statement refused to comment on her mental and physical health status, not even a passing comment that she was "perfectly healthy" or something.

But a lot of this doesn't make sense. The tight timeline with police arrival just 3 minutes later but with the wig off, the watch in the purse, no visible signs of her present, etc., doesn't make sense. The timeline but with the trucker eyewitness story doesn't make sense. It's all extraordinarily shocking to hear about at first, but the details don't add up in any parsable way.

I don't know. People will have to wait and see. I hope she's okay, apart from how it happened. Whatever happened, if she is safe somewhere, then the rest can be sorted out with whatever justice to anyone that harmed her.

I don’t understand you people who think she staged this. How in the hell would she have gotten away? On foot? No one’s seen her since?

This was not staged, FFS.

Still so sure, PP?

Oh, get a life.

(not PP)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The last few pages are mostly people making stuff up and in a mean spirited way - jumping to conclusions with a clear bias.

It's more than the last few pages. It happens on every single thread like this. Disgusting people.

And yet here you are, you wannabe Internet White Knight, you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wanted to say I'm happy that in this instance the police acted as police should act. They immediately began with search parties, released cam footage, etc. Now that Carlee is back home, they're not imposing themselves on an already traumatized family.

Kudos to this local Alabama police department for doing the job they're paid to do, and for treating this family respectfully.

+1

Unfortunately, that won't stop the crazies on DCUM.

If you’re all so upset with speculation on this thread, why do you keep clicking on it? Why are you on DCUM at all? You know this is how every DCUM thread is.

Because they love the rush of dopamine they get from that sweet, sweet “righteous” indignation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The last few pages are mostly people making stuff up and in a mean spirited way - jumping to conclusions with a clear bias.

Exactly. First she was a beautiful, young, smart, and caring person who was trafficked. Then, becuase she's alive, she's an unhinged whackjob.

We may never have answers. This isn't a movie. It's a person's life. The story was made public in order to help find her, and no one owes us a conclusion now that she's home.

But someone should owe that community for the wasted resources if it turns out it was a scam.

Pretty sure the police don't need your help on this.

DP. They were not police dollars that were spent on this -- they were taxpayer dollars. That doesn't mean everyone is owed a specific accounting, but it's more complicated than you imply.

Again, pretty sure the police don't need your help on this. They are responsible for enforcing the law, including fraud.

Again, nobody says the police “needed” anything from a poster on an internet message board who expressed their opinion about what *should* happen. Grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is wild as hell.

Some folks will be grateful that this board is anonymous, otherwise they’d be eating a ton of crow.

I hope she’s willing to talk one day. I need to know what happened.

#teamshewasattacked #ialwaysbelievedher

No one would be “eating crow.” It’s an internet discussion in which, for some unknown reason, you are bizarrely too invested.

And hashtags? Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:it really makes no sense that a bad person would use a child to trap a random female passerbye. The odds are overwhelming that a man or even an police officer would have been the one to stop help the kid. What would the bad person do then? Ah, "nothing going on here officer. Just lost my toddler in the woods adjacent to a freeway"

I've read elsewhere that maybe she just unfortunately stumbled upon a trafficked child or some other criminal activity and thus had to be "removed" because she was a witness.

This is such a freaky case.

I was buying the trap theory, but you’re right, PP. It doesn’t seem logical.

I guess she ran into something bad and was attacked as a result. I still think she saw a child, so was a child being abused or something?

I agree this makes more sense.

Eh but no other motorists reported a child. No traffic cams picked up movement other than cars and, allegedly, her car on the shoulder. (and not the perpetrators car either).

So no perpetrator's car? Are there houses nearby? A deep culvert or drainage area for someone creepy to hide/live in?

No other motorists reported a child, but her family member on the phone said they heard Carlee ask “are you okay?” Assuming she wasn’t on drugs/hallucinating, it seems like there really was a child she was talking to.

It’s possible a child escaped a trafficking endeavor and she came across it. That would be my best guess. It’s not completely unbelievable that no one else saw the child since it was a highway at night. I know I’m not always paying attention to the side of the roadway. Other drivers could have been paying attention to all the cars around them, their passengers, the radio, etc. and at night a small child on the side of the road isn’t necessarily going to be super easy to spot. Ugh my stomach is in knots over this, I cannot imagine what her friends and family are going through. She looks like a sweet girl. Nursing student willing to stop for a child, so she’s likely a caring person. This is so unfair.

I can’t figure drugs into the timeline she’s leaving work, getting dinner, doing hallucinatory drugs and driving home one exit away from her own? It wouldn’t make sense to do the drugs before getting home. Are people thinking she was doing hallucinogenic drugs at work? It was in her food?

Her being one exit away, with her exit visible makes me think she was that close to home.

Not PP, but when I first heard the details I thought one possible explanation could be that she was having a mental break and imagined/hallucinated that she saw a child, then went off into the woods on her own. I think the only other possibilities are that she stumbled onto a dangerous situation and was abducted, or that this is staged. Of those three possibilities it seems most likely she was abducted.

I didn't see that anyone else has been this blunt, but I've wondered this, too. The items she usually wore being neatly tucked away in her purse, even moreso than the happenstance of being on the phone. I don't know. I actually hope it was staged, because that would mean she was safe.

Why would anyone stage this? Not saying it’s out of the question (and it would make sense as to how she was able to pull over vs. driving past and needing to turn around). But I don’t know why anyone would do this? Fake abduction to get money? Attention? Maybe. But it seems so out there. This whole thing is weird.

I don't know. I also don't want to speculate about why the person making the police statement refused to comment on her mental and physical health status, not even a passing comment that she was "perfectly healthy" or something.

But a lot of this doesn't make sense. The tight timeline with police arrival just 3 minutes later but with the wig off, the watch in the purse, no visible signs of her present, etc., doesn't make sense. The timeline but with the trucker eyewitness story doesn't make sense. It's all extraordinarily shocking to hear about at first, but the details don't add up in any parsable way.

I don't know. People will have to wait and see. I hope she's okay, apart from how it happened. Whatever happened, if she is safe somewhere, then the rest can be sorted out with whatever justice to anyone that harmed her.

I don’t understand you people who think she staged this. How in the hell would she have gotten away? On foot? No one’s seen her since?

This was not staged, FFS.

Still so sure, PP?

Oh, get a life.

(not PP)

I take it you agree things are obviously fishy at this point. Took some people a long time, but oh well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:


I am still struggling with a 25 year old willingly leaving her phone behind…

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


I am still struggling with a 25 year old willingly leaving her phone behind…

+1

SOP for when you want to fake an abduction.