Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The rumors that Blake/Ryan are planning to sue their lawyers for malpractice continue. But, Plot Twist! Mark Garagos (Bryan Freedman’s bestie), said Gottlieb and co made sure to conduct the settlement under California jurisdiction so that they can’t be sued. Apparently there’s a law in California precluding people from suing their lawyers for malpractice if they settle privately. Garagos said there’s a saying that you get the lawyer you deserve lol.


Take a moment to ask yourself why "Bryan Freedman's bestie" is being interviewed about this case, and why he would be sharing info about where the settlement proceeding were held, what Lively's lawyers' strategy and motivations were, or what Lively is now personally considering. Is he a good resource for that info? What is his involvement in the case? Do we think Lively or her lawyers are confiding in him? Let's think.


PP - Mark Garagos is a famous lawyer in his own right who happens to also be freedman’s bestie. He always discloses it when talking about Bryan so it doesn’t seem like he’s being deceptive. But Mark does a podcast with the tmz guy, has a pod with another lawyer, and is a regular guest on Megyn Kelly. Basically he’s always talking and gets paid to do so. He didn’t just come out of the woodwork to talk about lively, he’s a regular commentator. He’s retired but his daughter is a young up and coming defense attorney. She was on the diddy case and is now on the Weinstein appeal.


And... why would he have special insight into what Lively or her lawyers are thinking? He isn't friends with them. But he has a strong motivation to imply negative things about her. So maybe it would be worth it to take the things he says with a grain of salt. Especially since he spends a lot of time gabbing with TMZ and Megyn Kelly, which both traffic in sensationalism.


If there’s one thing we all should have learned from this case, it’s that where there’s smoke there’s fire. The blinds, tmz, they all have sources. These rumors are out there because there’s some there there. Doesn’t mean Blake will sue her lawyers, but it’s reasonable to believe she’s unhappy with them. And it’s also reasonable to believe that they would be strategic enough to inoculate themselves from a lawsuit. Just look at all the trickery they did for Blake.


No, I do not think we have learned that, and you also didn't answer the question.

Bryan Freedman's "bff" has been making the rounds of talk shows saying that Blake is considering suing her lawyers and that her lawyers made sure to conduct settlement negotiations in CA to avoid being sued. This indicates personal, direct knowledge of private conversations between Blake and her husband, Blake and her legal team, and within her legal team. You need to ask yourself:

(1) Why would Blake, her legal team, or anyone associated with them share this information with Bryan Freedman's "bff"?

(2) Could there be another motive for Bryan Freedman's friend to spread this rumor on podcasts and talk shows? Is it possible that by speculating about these things that he could not possibly have any personal knowledge, of he gets a conversation started online that is unfavorable to Blake, which is positive for both his close friend, Bryan Freedman, and Freedman's clients?

If you've watched this entire case unfold and are still convinced that when a *clearly* biased person speculates wildly on camera, that must reflect the "real truth" that is being hidden from you by the "lame stream" media, then you have learned exactly nothing.


Dp, but why would Brian Freedman care whether Blake is paying her lawyers or thinking about suing them? Further, it is obvious that her lawyers made some very bad strategic calls, and that she ran up some very large bills. Now maybe Blake and Ryan made those bad strategic calls with full warning from the lawyers of the consequences, or maybe the lawyers were hamstrung because there simply wasn't good evidence for Blake's claims, or she destroyed evidence before the legal case really got going. Who knows? But given how one sided the settlement was in WF's favor, how much she spent on legal fees, and the really questionable legal strategy, it isn't a reach that Blake and Ryan are looking for someone to blame.


Either you can't even see how you are just buying into a narrative that was literally designed by Baldoni's PR team, or you are happily participating in pushing that narrative knowing what it is.

You ask why Bryan Freedman would care about whether Blake is paying her lawyers or thinking about suing them. Exactly. Why would he, or his "BFF" care about these things? They aren't relevant to the case. Yet here is his "BFF" going on Megyn Kelly of all places to wildly speculate about what Blake or her legal team are doing, to even weigh in on whether her legal team arranged to conduct settlement negotiations in a specific location in anticipation of Blake suing them? Why? Why is this a topic of conversation, why is he speculating about it at all, why is he touted and introduced as "Bryan Freedman's BFF" as though this someone qualifies him to speak intelligently on this subject that you just said yourself is not something that has anything to do with Bryan Freedman? And then you are treating his wild speculation as some kind of indication of reality even though he has no inside knowledge and no basis for the speculation. He doesn't even know Blake. He doesn't know her lawyers.

Bryan Freedman's best friend went on a podcast hosted by Bryan Freedman's client, Megyn Kelly, to speculate wildly about what Blake Lively is thinking and doing in private, and what her lawyers are thinking and doing in private, and then people who are fans of Bryan Freedman and his clients are repeating this speculation online like it's verified fact. This is the slop system. None of that is real. It's just BS intended to help Bryan Freedman and his various clients make money, at the expense of truth and the reputations of the people they gossip about. And you are gleefully participating.


You literally sound insane. Rumors about Blake being unhappy with her lawyers appeared many places before it was discussed on Kelly's show. It's not a big conspiracy -- Lively wound up with a horrendous result. I've been a litigator for two decades and have never seen a settlement where a plaintiff got zero dollars and no NDA. Her lawyers chose to file in NY when they needed California law to apply, and then lost on choice of law. Manatt filed a Doe lawsuit that was frankly unethical in the extreme. It would be strange if we weren't hearing these rumors.


Would the decision had been different if case had been filed in CA? I am not close to this but I thought the court ruled she wasn’t an employee so couldn’t sue for sexual harassment. It is also crazy how long it took to get this decision and the money wasted on discovery etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The rumors that Blake/Ryan are planning to sue their lawyers for malpractice continue. But, Plot Twist! Mark Garagos (Bryan Freedman’s bestie), said Gottlieb and co made sure to conduct the settlement under California jurisdiction so that they can’t be sued. Apparently there’s a law in California precluding people from suing their lawyers for malpractice if they settle privately. Garagos said there’s a saying that you get the lawyer you deserve lol.


Take a moment to ask yourself why "Bryan Freedman's bestie" is being interviewed about this case, and why he would be sharing info about where the settlement proceeding were held, what Lively's lawyers' strategy and motivations were, or what Lively is now personally considering. Is he a good resource for that info? What is his involvement in the case? Do we think Lively or her lawyers are confiding in him? Let's think.


PP - Mark Garagos is a famous lawyer in his own right who happens to also be freedman’s bestie. He always discloses it when talking about Bryan so it doesn’t seem like he’s being deceptive. But Mark does a podcast with the tmz guy, has a pod with another lawyer, and is a regular guest on Megyn Kelly. Basically he’s always talking and gets paid to do so. He didn’t just come out of the woodwork to talk about lively, he’s a regular commentator. He’s retired but his daughter is a young up and coming defense attorney. She was on the diddy case and is now on the Weinstein appeal.


And... why would he have special insight into what Lively or her lawyers are thinking? He isn't friends with them. But he has a strong motivation to imply negative things about her. So maybe it would be worth it to take the things he says with a grain of salt. Especially since he spends a lot of time gabbing with TMZ and Megyn Kelly, which both traffic in sensationalism.


If there’s one thing we all should have learned from this case, it’s that where there’s smoke there’s fire. The blinds, tmz, they all have sources. These rumors are out there because there’s some there there. Doesn’t mean Blake will sue her lawyers, but it’s reasonable to believe she’s unhappy with them. And it’s also reasonable to believe that they would be strategic enough to inoculate themselves from a lawsuit. Just look at all the trickery they did for Blake.


No, I do not think we have learned that, and you also didn't answer the question.

Bryan Freedman's "bff" has been making the rounds of talk shows saying that Blake is considering suing her lawyers and that her lawyers made sure to conduct settlement negotiations in CA to avoid being sued. This indicates personal, direct knowledge of private conversations between Blake and her husband, Blake and her legal team, and within her legal team. You need to ask yourself:

(1) Why would Blake, her legal team, or anyone associated with them share this information with Bryan Freedman's "bff"?

(2) Could there be another motive for Bryan Freedman's friend to spread this rumor on podcasts and talk shows? Is it possible that by speculating about these things that he could not possibly have any personal knowledge, of he gets a conversation started online that is unfavorable to Blake, which is positive for both his close friend, Bryan Freedman, and Freedman's clients?

If you've watched this entire case unfold and are still convinced that when a *clearly* biased person speculates wildly on camera, that must reflect the "real truth" that is being hidden from you by the "lame stream" media, then you have learned exactly nothing.


Dp, but why would Brian Freedman care whether Blake is paying her lawyers or thinking about suing them? Further, it is obvious that her lawyers made some very bad strategic calls, and that she ran up some very large bills. Now maybe Blake and Ryan made those bad strategic calls with full warning from the lawyers of the consequences, or maybe the lawyers were hamstrung because there simply wasn't good evidence for Blake's claims, or she destroyed evidence before the legal case really got going. Who knows? But given how one sided the settlement was in WF's favor, how much she spent on legal fees, and the really questionable legal strategy, it isn't a reach that Blake and Ryan are looking for someone to blame.


Either you can't even see how you are just buying into a narrative that was literally designed by Baldoni's PR team, or you are happily participating in pushing that narrative knowing what it is.

You ask why Bryan Freedman would care about whether Blake is paying her lawyers or thinking about suing them. Exactly. Why would he, or his "BFF" care about these things? They aren't relevant to the case. Yet here is his "BFF" going on Megyn Kelly of all places to wildly speculate about what Blake or her legal team are doing, to even weigh in on whether her legal team arranged to conduct settlement negotiations in a specific location in anticipation of Blake suing them? Why? Why is this a topic of conversation, why is he speculating about it at all, why is he touted and introduced as "Bryan Freedman's BFF" as though this someone qualifies him to speak intelligently on this subject that you just said yourself is not something that has anything to do with Bryan Freedman? And then you are treating his wild speculation as some kind of indication of reality even though he has no inside knowledge and no basis for the speculation. He doesn't even know Blake. He doesn't know her lawyers.

Bryan Freedman's best friend went on a podcast hosted by Bryan Freedman's client, Megyn Kelly, to speculate wildly about what Blake Lively is thinking and doing in private, and what her lawyers are thinking and doing in private, and then people who are fans of Bryan Freedman and his clients are repeating this speculation online like it's verified fact. This is the slop system. None of that is real. It's just BS intended to help Bryan Freedman and his various clients make money, at the expense of truth and the reputations of the people they gossip about. And you are gleefully participating.


You literally sound insane. Rumors about Blake being unhappy with her lawyers appeared many places before it was discussed on Kelly's show. It's not a big conspiracy -- Lively wound up with a horrendous result. I've been a litigator for two decades and have never seen a settlement where a plaintiff got zero dollars and no NDA. Her lawyers chose to file in NY when they needed California law to apply, and then lost on choice of law. Manatt filed a Doe lawsuit that was frankly unethical in the extreme. It would be strange if we weren't hearing these rumors.


Would the decision had been different if case had been filed in CA? I am not close to this but I thought the court ruled she wasn’t an employee so couldn’t sue for sexual harassment. It is also crazy how long it took to get this decision and the money wasted on discovery etc.


Not just money - discovery was humiliating for Blake and Ryan and while not career ending for Taylor and Matt Damon, certainly embarrassing and must have felt violating.

But anyway, it seems like Judge Liman certainly carefully considered everything and said that the behavior did not meet the standard of sexual harassment. Especially given the power that Blake wielded on set. So no I don’t think California would’ve made much of a difference for that.

I truly don’t think anything the lawyers could have done would’ve made that much of a difference. Their whole retaliation campaign argument was based on a bot army and one was never found. They tried to cover by saying it was untraceable, but that’s not really how things work. They subpoenaed over 100 content creators and found nothing, no coordination. Nobody was paid. It seems like Jed Wallace does some shady things but I certainly don’t think he’s smart enough to cover up a bot army. Maybe that was the intent and they saw what was happening organically and decided not to do it, but the fact of the matter is they found evidence of nothing, other than the general PR BS that every celeb does and Blake was certainly doing a thousand times more.

The big mistake the lawyers made was ever letting it get this far. Maybe they convinced her filing the CRD and doing the New York Times articles was enough and he could never come back from that and it would end there. That was a grave mistake. But then they just kept doubling down at every turn for well over a year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Um, you know what else wasn't real? Blake's (Ryan's) allegations. It was BS intended to make them money at the expense of the truth and reputation of the actual director. And their arse kissing hangers on gleefully participated.


Every one of her allegations was truthful. It was deemed not to be SH (or she was deemed an independent contractor who can't bring SH claims) but they were all real allegations. And the judge explicitly said that it was reasonable for her to have believed she was sexually harassed when these things happened.

Baldoni is a bad director who no one liked and even his friends and business partners know to be immature and hard to work with. He ruined his own reputation. If he wanted to maintain a good reputation in Hollywood, he should perhaps not have asked is lead actress's trainer about her weight, kept bringing up his porn addiction on set, kept talking to Blake about her dead father, and kept offending actresses on set by calling them hot, saying he must have "missed the HR meeting", or saying he could talk like this because his wife was there. He also jut ran a disorganized and unprofessional set that many people complained about.

Blake and Ryan didn't do any of that. I don't even like Blake and Ryan but Baldoni ruined his own rep by sucking at his job. How about make this adult man take responsibility for his own behavior instead of blaming it all on multiple women, his "neurodiversity", or Ryan Reynolds. I mean, grow up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Um, you know what else wasn't real? Blake's (Ryan's) allegations. It was BS intended to make them money at the expense of the truth and reputation of the actual director. And their arse kissing hangers on gleefully participated.


Every one of her allegations was truthful. It was deemed not to be SH (or she was deemed an independent contractor who can't bring SH claims) but they were all real allegations. And the judge explicitly said that it was reasonable for her to have believed she was sexually harassed when these things happened.

Baldoni is a bad director who no one liked and even his friends and business partners know to be immature and hard to work with. He ruined his own reputation. If he wanted to maintain a good reputation in Hollywood, he should perhaps not have asked is lead actress's trainer about her weight, kept bringing up his porn addiction on set, kept talking to Blake about her dead father, and kept offending actresses on set by calling them hot, saying he must have "missed the HR meeting", or saying he could talk like this because his wife was there. He also jut ran a disorganized and unprofessional set that many people complained about.

Blake and Ryan didn't do any of that. I don't even like Blake and Ryan but Baldoni ruined his own rep by sucking at his job. How about make this adult man take responsibility for his own behavior instead of blaming it all on multiple women, his "neurodiversity", or Ryan Reynolds. I mean, grow up.


NP. Even if all of this is true, why in the world would Blake and Ryan spend all this time and money on lawsuits because this guy was weird/immature/an a-hole/bad at his job? By the time you get to adulthood, literally everyone has had to deal with a sh*tty boss or crappy job at one time or another. That doesn't make it lawsuit-worthy-- or even if it IS lawsuit-worthy, it's very rarely worth the time, energy, and money to bring the lawsuit. Any sane person would move on with their life.

They went the full-scale nuclear option for no other reason than exacting revenge on their perceived enemies, but spinning it as "I am standing up for all victimized women everywhere. Look at what a hero I am." It's straight out of the narcissist's playbook, basically.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Um, you know what else wasn't real? Blake's (Ryan's) allegations. It was BS intended to make them money at the expense of the truth and reputation of the actual director. And their arse kissing hangers on gleefully participated.


Every one of her allegations was truthful. It was deemed not to be SH (or she was deemed an independent contractor who can't bring SH claims) but they were all real allegations. And the judge explicitly said that it was reasonable for her to have believed she was sexually harassed when these things happened.

Baldoni is a bad director who no one liked and even his friends and business partners know to be immature and hard to work with. He ruined his own reputation. If he wanted to maintain a good reputation in Hollywood, he should perhaps not have asked is lead actress's trainer about her weight, kept bringing up his porn addiction on set, kept talking to Blake about her dead father, and kept offending actresses on set by calling them hot, saying he must have "missed the HR meeting", or saying he could talk like this because his wife was there. He also jut ran a disorganized and unprofessional set that many people complained about.

Blake and Ryan didn't do any of that. I don't even like Blake and Ryan but Baldoni ruined his own rep by sucking at his job. How about make this adult man take responsibility for his own behavior instead of blaming it all on multiple women, his "neurodiversity", or Ryan Reynolds. I mean, grow up.


Why does this read like a 12 year wrote it? While much of the third paragraph is inaccurate, even taking it on its face, the alleged “parade of horrible” is pretty meh. He talked to Blake about her dead father? Stop the presses. He asked how much Blake weighed? The horror. Talk about having zero sense of what actual mismanagement or sexual harassment would look like.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Um, you know what else wasn't real? Blake's (Ryan's) allegations. It was BS intended to make them money at the expense of the truth and reputation of the actual director. And their arse kissing hangers on gleefully participated.


Every one of her allegations was truthful. It was deemed not to be SH (or she was deemed an independent contractor who can't bring SH claims) but they were all real allegations. And the judge explicitly said that it was reasonable for her to have believed she was sexually harassed when these things happened.

Baldoni is a bad director who no one liked and even his friends and business partners know to be immature and hard to work with. He ruined his own reputation. If he wanted to maintain a good reputation in Hollywood, he should perhaps not have asked is lead actress's trainer about her weight, kept bringing up his porn addiction on set, kept talking to Blake about her dead father, and kept offending actresses on set by calling them hot, saying he must have "missed the HR meeting", or saying he could talk like this because his wife was there. He also jut ran a disorganized and unprofessional set that many people complained about.

Blake and Ryan didn't do any of that. I don't even like Blake and Ryan but Baldoni ruined his own rep by sucking at his job. How about make this adult man take responsibility for his own behavior instead of blaming it all on multiple women, his "neurodiversity", or Ryan Reynolds. I mean, grow up.


I don’t understand lying about Justin‘s track record. He had directed another low budget film with a budget of 6 million and it made 60 million. Very few directors in Hollywood would have that kind of success these days. He was the one who had the brains to adapt Colleen’s book before anyone else saw the value and made a killing off that.

I know it’s an inconvenient truth, but he actually has talent. And he’s going to go on to develop direct and produce more movies, which is more than Blake can say.
Anonymous
The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Insanity to claim not only all, but ANY allegations were true. We caught her in lie after lie, and the judge said that her accusations did not meet the standard of sexual harassment.

And everything about the retaliation was basically a lie - no untraceable smear campaign, no army of bots…. turns out people just really don’t like Blake and now they don’t like Ryan either.

So interesting that Colleen Hoover stopped following Blake and Ryan (along with many others, together they lost 10 million followers) and has deleted all of the pictures of it ends with us except for the announcement that they were making a movie from her Instagram. She had tons with Blake from the press tour, etc., and they’re all wiped out. Blake’s shenanigans burned her - her next two movies after it ends with us have barely made a dent - with a moderate success, but reminders of him basically broke even, and with the upcoming verity they’re not selling it as a Colleen Hoover movie at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Will Blake bot actually be paid or is that one of the padded invoices Blake and Ryan are going to sue over? lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Will she be at the Swift/Kelce wedding? Asking the real questions.


Who the hell cares? A desperate aging singer marrying a fame-whoring idiot, it's Mariah Carey marrying Nick Cannon, pt II.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Will Blake bot actually be paid or is that one of the padded invoices Blake and Ryan are going to sue over? lol


I think people need to stop engaging with the Blake bot…
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Will Blake bot actually be paid or is that one of the padded invoices Blake and Ryan are going to sue over? lol


The bot(s) certainly acted like they were paid per word, per post, and were billing 24 hours a day. Didn’t matter if it was 9AM, 7PM, or 4AM, they responded at all hours for more than a year.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Insanity to claim not only all, but ANY allegations were true. We caught her in lie after lie, and the judge said that her accusations did not meet the standard of sexual harassment.

And everything about the retaliation was basically a lie - no untraceable smear campaign, no army of bots…. turns out people just really don’t like Blake and now they don’t like Ryan either.

So interesting that Colleen Hoover stopped following Blake and Ryan (along with many others, together they lost 10 million followers) and has deleted all of the pictures of it ends with us except for the announcement that they were making a movie from her Instagram. She had tons with Blake from the press tour, etc., and they’re all wiped out. Blake’s shenanigans burned her - her next two movies after it ends with us have barely made a dent - with a moderate success, but reminders of him basically broke even, and with the upcoming verity they’re not selling it as a Colleen Hoover movie at all.


Blake destroyed Hoover's brand and made it toxic.

Hoover is partly to blame for going along with it at first.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Insanity to claim not only all, but ANY allegations were true. We caught her in lie after lie, and the judge said that her accusations did not meet the standard of sexual harassment.

And everything about the retaliation was basically a lie - no untraceable smear campaign, no army of bots…. turns out people just really don’t like Blake and now they don’t like Ryan either.

So interesting that Colleen Hoover stopped following Blake and Ryan (along with many others, together they lost 10 million followers) and has deleted all of the pictures of it ends with us except for the announcement that they were making a movie from her Instagram. She had tons with Blake from the press tour, etc., and they’re all wiped out. Blake’s shenanigans burned her - her next two movies after it ends with us have barely made a dent - with a moderate success, but reminders of him basically broke even, and with the upcoming verity they’re not selling it as a Colleen Hoover movie at all.


Blake destroyed Hoover's brand and made it toxic.

Hoover is partly to blame for going along with it at first.


For sure. She handpicked Baldoni and was happy to do panels with him etc and then she wanted to get in with Blake. You could tell from her texts she was very enamored with her and with her relationship with Taylor.

Admitted in her deposition that she unfollowed him because Blake told her to.

Ultimately it did burn her.

It seems like Colleen, Brandon, and Isabel all had positive experiences with Justin until Blake convinced them otherwise. I actually respect Jenny Slate more because she didn’t like him from the start and it seemed like she didn’t like him on her own terms, but they seemed to just go with who had the most power.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment. Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true. No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.


Will Blake bot actually be paid or is that one of the padded invoices Blake and Ryan are going to sue over? lol


The bot(s) certainly acted like they were paid per word, per post, and were billing 24 hours a day. Didn’t matter if it was 9AM, 7PM, or 4AM, they responded at all hours for more than a year.


Probably billing them $$$$$ but sub-contracted the actual work out to some Third World bot farm who worked 24/7 for pennies on the dollar
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: