How can we combat deep misogyny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.

No, women need to be at home taking care of their children instead of Day Care strangers.

And women already have equal rights, what feminist hags are running their stupid loud mouths about are having “special rights” where having a vagina automatically gets you hired for a management or CEO position.

Trump and Vance will hopefully bring in more merit-based hiring in the govt instead of Diversity/DEI quota hires.

Why women and not men?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.

No, women need to be at home taking care of their children instead of Day Care strangers.

And women already have equal rights, what feminist hags are running their stupid loud mouths about are having “special rights” where having a vagina automatically gets you hired for a management or CEO position.

Trump and Vance will hopefully bring in more merit-based hiring in the govt instead of Diversity/DEI quota hires.

Wow, good luck with your incel life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

It’s not exactly secret that women have to be near perfect to secure the same job an average man has access to.

This...is not true. Why do you keep saying this?

It often is true and we have seen it many, many times. The election was just one example writ large.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's apparent that it runs incredibly deep in this country, where a woman's professional status is put under a significantly higher scrutiny than a man's, or the standards for which she could be put in the same professional level with a man (or higher) are impossibly unrealistic. She will never be "enough" even compared to males with mediocrity.

If we can somehow avoid talking about politics, can we please have a serious discussion about how deep misogyny runs in America (and yes, much more than many other places--or at least in different ways) and how we can successfully combat it? Is it possible? What do you think works well in other countries? What can we do here?

We can't with an administration coming in where both the president and VP are raving misogynists not to mention his choice for Sec. of Defense. Trump has tokenism with his CoS and Noehm but they won't last.

Well, at least you can take comfort in the fact that the nominee for Attorney General seems to like women.

Girls. He seems to like girls, and not in a good way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.

No, women need to be at home taking care of their children instead of Day Care strangers.

And women already have equal rights, what feminist hags are running their stupid loud mouths about are having “special rights” where having a vagina automatically gets you hired for a management or CEO position.

Trump and Vance will hopefully bring in more merit-based hiring in the govt instead of Diversity/DEI quota hires.

Awww is it really hard to acknowledge that the reason you're not getting job is because you're just utterly dumb and unqualified and that it has nothing to do with women in the workforce? Because you still wouldn't get the job even if it were all men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.

You think leaning in to the patriarchy will somehow end the patriarchy? Please.

[Anonymous]

The best way to combat it is to not give it power. Pursue your dreams. Work hard so you are better, stronger, smarter. Ignore the incels and leave them in your dust!

Never reward toxic masculinity and don’t raise turds! Support your sons in all their interests. Don’t steer them away from things you don’t consider manly. Support SAHM dads!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

This.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.

I'm a woman and I'd rather be with my children. We saved our money for years, why do I want to sit in a cube for the sisterhood?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More women need to stay in the workforce so that it’s easier for all of us to fight for equal rights and work life balance. But the opposite will happen because of cultural forces and the trump administration—I’m sure Vance will find a way to stick it to working women.

I'm a woman and I'd rather be with my children. We saved our money for years, why do I want to sit in a cube for the sisterhood?

Because caring for your children is women’s work and therefore not valued in our materialistic, capitalist, patriarchal society. By going to work, earning money, and ALSO having the babies, you are making life easier… for men. Isn’t it obvious that all true feminists should agree with men that women are useless unless they’re out there in the working world, away from their children, toiling away to make rich men even richer?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The best way to combat it is to not give it power. Pursue your dreams. Work hard so you are better, stronger, smarter. Ignore the incels and leave them in your dust!

Never reward toxic masculinity and don’t raise turds! Support your sons in all their interests. Don’t steer them away from things you don’t consider manly. Support SAHM dads!

Poor kid!

No wonder guys are so wimpy now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

It’s not exactly secret that women have to be near perfect to secure the same job an average man has access to.

That is simply not true in most high performing companies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

Thank you. It's not misogyny, but termed eyes, and ears!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a women who voted for Hillary, Warren in primary, and Harris, I will not endorse a women again because this country is not ready. My boys are, but only one can vote in the next election cycle

You think people didn't elect Hillary because they weren't ready for a woman 8 years ago? Maybe, but more likely because people didn't like her, her platform, her shiftiness, etc.

Remember she wasn't going to the rust states like Trump was. He kept going back and a lot, and if I recall I think she got sick there at the end. Also, she was hanging around the Wieners which also hurt her. Not to mention Bill was going to be very much a part of her win. And finally, her email scandal which Comey for some reason felt he needed to publicly address just before the election. It's much easier to blame "misogyny" on everything, but often it's simply the person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.

That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.