Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions. Hypocrite. |
Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible) |
Ok yeap. People who voted for him don’t care he messed up the pandemic response or that the US became the laughing stock of the world or that he encouraged people to ingest bleach to deal with COVID. They just adore the narcissist. |
It's hopeless because even women propagate misogyny. Women are often first in line to criticize another woman's appearance or clothing. When I was in college 15 years ago, both my male and female friends said the preferred to work for male bosses. Today, they'd probably know better than voicing those opinions out loud, but I wouldn't be surprised if it hasn't changed. |
*said they preferred to work for male bosses Men are still viewed as leaders, and women as followers. |
Except one was objectively much, much more terrible. |
It is still the same and there is nothing wrong with this. |
That’s not it. |
She was terrible, yes, but mostly she was just insignificant. |
Sure, a former AG, senator then VP. But please tell me how a guy who hosted The Apprentice was "significant." |
It's always telling with Kamala that defenders only talk about jobs she's held, but never things she has accomplished or superlative traits she possesses. Trump is the most significant political figure since at least Reagan. |
Significant, but not in a good way. Kinda like how Hitler was "significant". I'll take insignificant, but competent over significant nightmare any day. |
When Harris was on the other side. |
Oh, damn. |
Troll |