How can we combat deep misogyny?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.


Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.


In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

Because they both have a political past, and we were better off with his. Why can’t you comprehend this?


Ok yeap. People who voted for him don’t care he messed up the pandemic response or that the US became the laughing stock of the world or that he encouraged people to ingest bleach to deal with COVID. They just adore the narcissist.
Anonymous
It's hopeless because even women propagate misogyny. Women are often first in line to criticize another woman's appearance or clothing. When I was in college 15 years ago, both my male and female friends said the preferred to work for male bosses. Today, they'd probably know better than voicing those opinions out loud, but I wouldn't be surprised if it hasn't changed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's hopeless because even women propagate misogyny. Women are often first in line to criticize another woman's appearance or clothing. When I was in college 15 years ago, both my male and female friends said the preferred to work for male bosses. Today, they'd probably know better than voicing those opinions out loud, but I wouldn't be surprised if it hasn't changed.


*said they preferred to work for male bosses

Men are still viewed as leaders, and women as followers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.


Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible)


Except one was objectively much, much more terrible.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's hopeless because even women propagate misogyny. Women are often first in line to criticize another woman's appearance or clothing. When I was in college 15 years ago, both my male and female friends said the preferred to work for male bosses. Today, they'd probably know better than voicing those opinions out loud, but I wouldn't be surprised if it hasn't changed.


It is still the same and there is nothing wrong with this.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's hopeless because even women propagate misogyny. Women are often first in line to criticize another woman's appearance or clothing. When I was in college 15 years ago, both my male and female friends said the preferred to work for male bosses. Today, they'd probably know better than voicing those opinions out loud, but I wouldn't be surprised if it hasn't changed.


*said they preferred to work for male bosses

Men are still viewed as leaders, and women as followers.


That’s not it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.


Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible)


Except one was objectively much, much more terrible.


She was terrible, yes, but mostly she was just insignificant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.


Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible)


Except one was objectively much, much more terrible.


She was terrible, yes, but mostly she was just insignificant.


Sure, a former AG, senator then VP. But please tell me how a guy who hosted The Apprentice was "significant."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.


Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible)


Except one was objectively much, much more terrible.


She was terrible, yes, but mostly she was just insignificant.


Sure, a former AG, senator then VP. But please tell me how a guy who hosted The Apprentice was "significant."


It's always telling with Kamala that defenders only talk about jobs she's held, but never things she has accomplished or superlative traits she possesses.

Trump is the most significant political figure since at least Reagan.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stop blaming misogyny for simply being a sh!tty candidate or bad at you job.

Put your nose to the grind and earn your stripes up. Life isn't fair, and it is a dog eat dog world. No one owes you anything. You are not entitled to anything because you have a vagina despite what your permanent victimhood.classes taught you while you were in college going $180k in debt for a worthless degree.

This might shock you, but there are women who are good at their jobs and who are terrible at their jobs. Just like men. There are far more people who are mediocre to bad than good, which means most women, just like men, are mediocre to bad. Next time, pick good female candidates of you want to win elections, not thoroughly mid to bad selections like Hillary and Harris.


That sums it up. Harris was very cringe in most of her interviews or appearances. During Oprah I felt like she was on some kind of substance. She couldn't say what she was going to do with the border, and during the Holt interview she said, "So what I haven't been to Europe either". She avoided many interviews for all those months then bombed most.


Right. Like Trump had "substance". He spins up grievances; he doesn't offer up real solutions.

Hypocrite.


Both candidates were, um, “less than ideal?” (Read: both terrible)


Except one was objectively much, much more terrible.


She was terrible, yes, but mostly she was just insignificant.


Sure, a former AG, senator then VP. But please tell me how a guy who hosted The Apprentice was "significant."


It's always telling with Kamala that defenders only talk about jobs she's held, but never things she has accomplished or superlative traits she possesses.

Trump is the most significant political figure since at least Reagan.


Significant, but not in a good way. Kinda like how Hitler was "significant".

I'll take insignificant, but competent over significant nightmare any day.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.


In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?


When Harris was on the other side.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.


In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?


When Harris was on the other side.


Oh, damn.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.


In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?


When Harris was on the other side.


Troll
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: