Nikki Haley - What are the chances

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whoa

Just 23% of Haley supporters say they would vote for Trump in a matchup with Biden.

43% would vote for Biden instead.

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2024/01/14/iowa-poll-nikki-haley-supporters-more-likely-vote-joe-biden-over-donald-trump-november-2024-election/72193795007/

This is what I am saying. The rabid Trump people are going to continue to be rabid, but if you've turned away from Trump because of his many issue, then you may also turn against him. I don't think the GOP has been attracting a lot of new voters since 2016.

To that point, when Hillary ran in 2016, she said that half of Trump supporters were deplorables.

In 2024, that number is up to 81%

Today's GOP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I voted for Biden. If Haley is on the ticket, I will vote for her.

I, like most normal people, am in the anyone but Trump or Biden camp but Haley won't get my vote. She would obviously be a better choice overall as a leader than one of the senile old men but I can't quite go there for policy difference reasons. I also think DeSantis has joined my anyone but list. He is almost as unlikable as Trump.

Elections are about keeping out the lessor of the two evils. They always have been and always will be with few exceptions. You look for who will do less damage. If you are looking to be excited about your candidate, you are going to be disappointed.

I think if you take a closer look at presidential elections in the 20th and early 21st century you'd find that there was at least one candidate and in many cases both candidates nominated by the two major parties that most people would think are reasonably fit for office and had presidential resumes. This includes candidates that a high majority of Americans would feel comfortable with as leaders of the country even if they were of the opposite party. There will always been a small percentage of far right or left wing people that aren't satisfied with anyone but we typical have had options to choose from that were viable presidential candidates at the time they were nominated. We're currently faced with an upcoming election with a likelihood of two very unpopular nominees that are clearly not among the best available POTUS options. This is not okay and we shouldn't accept it as the norm.

Nope.

The GOP nominated Trump.
And Trump won the electoral college vote.

Neither has anything to do with Democrats.

After Obama and Trump, people want to be excited and entertained by the politicians. This is exactly part of the problem plaguing us.

If voters really cared about "reasonably fit" and "presidential resumes" and "viable candidates" they would not have elected Trump in 2016. The man who never did a day of public service in his life.

Americans don't care about anything in your post.

If this were the case, we would have Trump-like presidents long before 2016. We went from a 2012 election with two very respectable major party candidates to having Trump win one and possibly two out of three elections. Nothing is normal about this. The American people didn't create this mess. An absence of leadership and functionality within our two major political parties created the opportunity for this to happen.

The Electoral College and gerrymandering created this mess. The majority of Americans did not vote for Trump and never have and never will.

A potential change to the process of how we determine the winner of our presidential elections is a debate to be had. As it is, Trump won fairly and squarely in 2016 and he has a good chance of winning in 2024. Regardless of what the electoral process is and has been, we've never had a successful presidential candidate as clearly unfit as Trump. Weaknesses in the GOP allowed Trump to be nominated and weaknesses in the Dem party allowed for one Trump victory and possibly a second.

Nope.

The GOP nominated Trump.
And Trump won the electoral college vote.

Neither has anything to do with Democrats.

When someone as awful as Trump wins or has a chance to win, it has a lot to do with who is his opponent was or is. If Trump were running against Obama in 2016, he would have had absolutely no chance. If he were currently running against one of our nation's top Dem governors, he would have no chance in 2024. Similarly, if Biden beats Trump in 2024 and then dies in 2026 creating division and chaos that slows the function of the Federal Government, a portion of blame for this mess would fall on the shoulders of the GOP for not nominating a candidate strong enough to be an unpopular 81 year old.

So you are blaming the democrats for nominating arguably the most qualified candidate in terms of experience since George Herbert Walker Bush because the GOP spent 20 years demonizing her for choosing to work as a lawyer over being a stay at home mom, and you claim the Dems are the ones who play the culture wars.

Stop blaming the Dems for Trump. The GOP voters nominated him and then carried him into office with a little help from oversees partners who received their payback in spades and are still receiving their payback.

We should have nominated Hillary in 2008. That debacle led us to Trump having a chance of victory in 2016. Everyone wants to point the finger elsewhere but when someone as awful as Trump beats you and is threatening to beat you again, there is some in-house accountability to be considered.

Stop it. You act as if Republicans have no agency. They picked someone as awful as Trump because that's who they are and that's what they like.

Yes, and we lost to that garbage.

Because a huge number of people in this country want garbage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Whoa

Just 23% of Haley supporters say they would vote for Trump in a matchup with Biden.

43% would vote for Biden instead.

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/caucus/2024/01/14/iowa-poll-nikki-haley-supporters-more-likely-vote-joe-biden-over-donald-trump-november-2024-election/72193795007/

This is what I am saying. The rabid Trump people are going to continue to be rabid, but if you've turned away from Trump because of his many issue, then you may also turn against him. I don't think the GOP has been attracting a lot of new voters since 2016.

To that point, when Hillary ran in 2016, she said that half of Trump supporters were deplorables.

In 2024, that number is up to 81%

Today's GOP.

We should have known the number was higher than 50% based on the number of Trump supporters who self-identified as being part of the half she was calling "deplorable."

[Anonymous]

Zero chance with answers like this

Narrator: He has been found guilty of sexual assault in a civil case. He is literally sitting in a court room as she is saying this.

[Anonymous]

Hmm, Nimrata, why do you call yourself Nikki?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Zero chance with answers like this

Narrator: He has been found guilty of sexual assault in a civil case. He is literally sitting in a court room as she is saying this.

The GOP knows nothing, hears nothing, sees nothing that might penetrate their carefully constructed worldview.

[Anonymous]

She's banking on Biden fixing the election to keep Trump out. She thinks it'll be her and Desantis only.

[Anonymous]

New Hampshire - GOP Presidential Polling:

Haley: 40%
Trump: 40%
DeSantis: 4%
Ramaswamy: 4%

American Research Group / Jan 15, 2024 / n=600

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She's banking on Biden fixing the election to keep Trump out. She thinks it'll be her and Desantis only.

MAGAs will never vote for her, which makes her non-viable in a national election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She's banking on Biden fixing the election to keep Trump out. She thinks it'll be her and Desantis only.

Biden is too busy to "fix" an election and he has no choice but to hope Trump gets the nomination because that is likely Biden's only path to victory in the general election.

[Anonymous]

I mean, this is just sad:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean, this is just sad:

What is sad is that there are still morons (like you) pushing the lie that Nikki is not her given name - as in actually on her birth certificate.

Nikki Haley was born Nimarata Nikki Randhawa to Punjabi Sikh immigrants. She has gone by her middle name, a Punjabi word for "little one," since well before she entered political life.

Haley was born to Punjabi Indian immigrants and was named Nimarata Nikki Randhawa. Her legal middle name has this been Nikki since her birth -- she did not choose that name, nor did she "anglicize" her first name from Nimarata to Nikki.

Second, while Nikki is a common American nickname, it is a Punjabi one as well. As Tunku Varadarajan explained in a Wall Street Journal editorial, “'Nikki' is a Punjabi word that means 'little one,' often used as a term of endearment for the youngest girl in a Sikh family."

Finally, Haley did not adopt the name Nikki as a way to boost her political career, as she has used that name since long before she entered the political arena. For example, she identified herself as Nikki Randhawa in her 1989 high school yearbook. In 1997, she married Michael Haley and took her husband's last name, becoming Nikki Haley.

Because Nikki is a legal name given to her on her birth certificate with a cultural connection to her heritage, and because she has used this name all of her life, allegations that Nikki Haley "changed" or "whitewashed" her name are "False."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nikki-haley-change-name/

[Anonymous]

Agree, Nikki’s name is Nikki. As the governor of South Carolina, a slave-owning state, maybe there is some other evidence of racism in this country?

[Anonymous]

Well, I guess that means Nikki ain’t gonna be the VP. Trump just poisoned that well:

https://www.instagram.com/p/C2MJyOusdS9/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==



I honestly do not think he respects any woman enough to make one his VP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, this is just sad:

What is sad is that there are still morons (like you) pushing the lie that Nikki is not her given name - as in actually on her birth certificate.

Nikki Haley was born Nimarata Nikki Randhawa to Punjabi Sikh immigrants. She has gone by her middle name, a Punjabi word for "little one," since well before she entered political life.

Haley was born to Punjabi Indian immigrants and was named Nimarata Nikki Randhawa. Her legal middle name has this been Nikki since her birth -- she did not choose that name, nor did she "anglicize" her first name from Nimarata to Nikki.

Second, while Nikki is a common American nickname, it is a Punjabi one as well. As Tunku Varadarajan explained in a Wall Street Journal editorial, “'Nikki' is a Punjabi word that means 'little one,' often used as a term of endearment for the youngest girl in a Sikh family."

Finally, Haley did not adopt the name Nikki as a way to boost her political career, as she has used that name since long before she entered the political arena. For example, she identified herself as Nikki Randhawa in her 1989 high school yearbook. In 1997, she married Michael Haley and took her husband's last name, becoming Nikki Haley.

Because Nikki is a legal name given to her on her birth certificate with a cultural connection to her heritage, and because she has used this name all of her life, allegations that Nikki Haley "changed" or "whitewashed" her name are "False."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nikki-haley-change-name/

If you have to explain it to the GOP base, you already lost the plot. Sorry.