NJ to teach gender lessons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

You are confused. There are multiple companies trying to sell lesson plans.

The OP said that NJ was using the “Pink Purple Blue” lesson plans. That’s what the DP above was referring to.

And the earlier PP was sharing videos from the Rutgers Amaze group.

NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE BEING USED IN NJ SCHOOLS.

Well yeah. After parents flipped out, they paused the plan to review what the governor of NJ called inappropriate content.

So was the governor lying to us?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

You are confused. There are multiple companies trying to sell lesson plans.

The OP said that NJ was using the “Pink Purple Blue” lesson plans. That’s what the DP above was referring to.

And the earlier PP was sharing videos from the Rutgers Amaze group.

NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE BEING USED IN NJ SCHOOLS.

YES THEY ARE.

THEY ARE LISTED ON nj.gov as a RESOURCE for STUDENT EDUCATION. Specifically in support of the new lesson plan.

https://www.nj.gov/education/standards/chp/index.shtml#standard2.1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

You are confused. There are multiple companies trying to sell lesson plans.

The OP said that NJ was using the “Pink Purple Blue” lesson plans. That’s what the DP above was referring to.

And the earlier PP was sharing videos from the Rutgers Amaze group.

NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE BEING USED IN NJ SCHOOLS.

Well yeah. After parents flipped out, they paused the plan to review what the governor of NJ called inappropriate content.

So was the governor lying to us?

Lying about what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

You are confused. There are multiple companies trying to sell lesson plans.

The OP said that NJ was using the “Pink Purple Blue” lesson plans. That’s what the DP above was referring to.

And the earlier PP was sharing videos from the Rutgers Amaze group.

NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE BEING USED IN NJ SCHOOLS.

YES THEY ARE.

THEY ARE LISTED ON nj.gov as a RESOURCE for STUDENT EDUCATION. Specifically in support of the new lesson plan.

https://www.nj.gov/education/standards/chp/index.shtml#standard2.1

THEY ARE UPDATING THE CURRICULUM NOW. CHANGES DON’T ROLL OUT UNTIL FALL 2022.

[Anonymous]

I know some of you struggle with reading comprehension but give this a try:
https://newjerseymonitor.com/2022/04/14/parents-grapple-with-new-sex-education-standards-but-many-support-it/

New Jersey’s updated sex education standards, set to be rolled out in schools in the fall

Parents who don’t want their children to learn about certain topics or sex education can opt out, the Department of Education said in a statement. A spokesman said the department does not mandate curriculum, and local school districts create their own lesson plans.

[Anonymous]

For second graders, the new standards mean teachers discussing gnder role stereotypes and how people can express how they feel. By the end of fifth grade, students should be able to differentiate between sxual orientation and gnder identity. And by eighth grade, teachers should be developing a plan to promote dignity and respect for all gnder expressions, and students should know the difference between gnders, gnder identity, and sxual orientation. In 12th grade, students will learn about birth control options, diseases, and consent.

The vast majority of parents support quality, inclusive sx education. I think some folks are stirring this up for political advantage and are not being truthful in what they’re saying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

You are confused. There are multiple companies trying to sell lesson plans.

The OP said that NJ was using the “Pink Purple Blue” lesson plans. That’s what the DP above was referring to.

And the earlier PP was sharing videos from the Rutgers Amaze group.

NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE BEING USED IN NJ SCHOOLS.

Well yeah. After parents flipped out, they paused the plan to review what the governor of NJ called inappropriate content.

So was the governor lying to us?

Lying about what?

Was he lying when he said some of the content is inappropriate?

[Anonymous]

Here is what he said:

[i]“At a time when we must prioritize student mental health and academic recovery in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is paramount that our standards also promote inclusivity and respect for every child, including LGBTQ youth,” Murphy wrote Thursday in a statement. “In New Jersey, parents always have and always will have a say in their child’s education, which includes opting their child out of any health lesson that they would rather discuss in the privacy of their own home.”

“Unfortunately, our learning standards have been intentionally misrepresented by some politicians seeking to divide and score political points,” Murphy continued, echoing comments made earlier this week.

“At the same time, we have seen a handful of sample lesson plans being circulated that have not been adopted in our school districts and do not accurately reflect the spirit of the standards. Any proposed educational content that is not age-appropriate should be immediately revised by local officials.”
[u]

He said no school districts have adopted those lesson plans.

And he said they “don’t reflect the spirit of the standards”.

So - like he said - misrepresented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For second graders, the new standards mean teachers discussing gnder role stereotypes and how people can express how they feel. By the end of fifth grade, students should be able to differentiate between sxual orientation and gnder identity. And by eighth grade, teachers should be developing a plan to promote dignity and respect for all gnder expressions, and students should know the difference between gnders, gnder identity, and sxual orientation. In 12th grade, students will learn about birth control options, diseases, and consent.

The vast majority of parents support quality, inclusive sx education. I think some folks are stirring this up for political advantage and are not being truthful in what they’re saying

Why is gender spelled without an “e”?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For second graders, the new standards mean teachers discussing gnder role stereotypes and how people can express how they feel. By the end of fifth grade, students should be able to differentiate between sxual orientation and gnder identity. And by eighth grade, teachers should be developing a plan to promote dignity and respect for all gnder expressions, and students should know the difference between gnders, gnder identity, and sxual orientation. In 12th grade, students will learn about birth control options, diseases, and consent.

The vast majority of parents support quality, inclusive sx education. I think some folks are stirring this up for political advantage and are not being truthful in what they’re saying

Why is gender spelled without an “e”?

It was getting blocked. Not sure why. You could ask Jeff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Teaching kids in elementary school about “flicking the bean” is appropriate? It’s not. Not at all.

Ok. No one is proposing to do that.

Manufactured issue.

It’s in a video specifically linked on the nj.gov education resource website for educational standards.

What age/grade level do you think is appropriate to learn about “flicking the bean” in school?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here is what he said:

[i]“At a time when we must prioritize student mental health and academic recovery in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is paramount that our standards also promote inclusivity and respect for every child, including LGBTQ youth,” Murphy wrote Thursday in a statement. “In New Jersey, parents always have and always will have a say in their child’s education, which includes opting their child out of any health lesson that they would rather discuss in the privacy of their own home.”

“Unfortunately, our learning standards have been intentionally misrepresented by some politicians seeking to divide and score political points,” Murphy continued, echoing comments made earlier this week.

“At the same time, we have seen a handful of sample lesson plans being circulated that have not been adopted in our school districts and do not accurately reflect the spirit of the standards. Any proposed educational content that is not age-appropriate should be immediately revised by local officials.”
[u]

He said no school districts have adopted those lesson plans.

And he said they “don’t reflect the spirit of the standards”.

So - like he said - misrepresented.

He said the lesson plans dont reflect the standards. In other words, they are not going to be implemented because they were beyond what was authorized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Teaching kids in elementary school about “flicking the bean” is appropriate? It’s not. Not at all.

Ok. No one is proposing to do that.

Manufactured issue.

It’s in a video specifically linked on the nj.gov education resource website for educational standards.

What age/grade level do you think is appropriate to learn about “flicking the bean” in school?

Upper HS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here is what he said:

[i]“At a time when we must prioritize student mental health and academic recovery in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is paramount that our standards also promote inclusivity and respect for every child, including LGBTQ youth,” Murphy wrote Thursday in a statement. “In New Jersey, parents always have and always will have a say in their child’s education, which includes opting their child out of any health lesson that they would rather discuss in the privacy of their own home.”

“Unfortunately, our learning standards have been intentionally misrepresented by some politicians seeking to divide and score political points,” Murphy continued, echoing comments made earlier this week.

“At the same time, we have seen a handful of sample lesson plans being circulated that have not been adopted in our school districts and do not accurately reflect the spirit of the standards. Any proposed educational content that is not age-appropriate should be immediately revised by local officials.”
[u]

He said no school districts have adopted those lesson plans.

And he said they “don’t reflect the spirit of the standards”.

So - like he said - misrepresented.

He said the lesson plans dont reflect the standards. In other words, they are not going to be implemented because they were beyond what was authorized.

We will find out.

Hopefully no RWNJs died of hysteria during this manufactured issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Teaching kids in elementary school about “flicking the bean” is appropriate? It’s not. Not at all.

Ok. No one is proposing to do that.

Manufactured issue.

It’s in a video specifically linked on the nj.gov education resource website for educational standards.

What age/grade level do you think is appropriate to learn about “flicking the bean” in school?

Upper HS.

Mid terms is going to be lit.