NJ to teach gender lessons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

DP. Yes, she did. She's correct.

She totally is. Keep it up till at least November please.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

When you don’t have an actual argument . . .

Highlighting a mildly sexist idiom is a counterargument to the actual point? Huh. Learn something new every day, I guess...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

When you don’t have an actual argument . . .

Highlighting a mildly sexist idiom is a counterargument to the actual point? Huh. Learn something new every day, I guess...

If you actually read, you'd see that the post says that the NJ teachings are misogynistic.

How do you think you will convince anyone who is not already convinced? If you cannot read?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

DP. You are making a fool of yourself. Just thought you should know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:One of the many reasons we pulled our kids from public school. This is not a winning issue for Democrats.

You live in NJ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

When you don’t have an actual argument . . .

Highlighting a mildly sexist idiom is a counterargument to the actual point? Huh. Learn something new every day, I guess...

It wasn't a mildly sexist comment, it was an extremely sexist comment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why we emphasizing feeling like a boy or girl at age 6. I really thought as a society we were moving toward not emphasizing that there were “boy” or “girl” activities, feelings and toys for kids. These lessons seem like a step backwards into segregating into gender stereotypes.

This x1000. It’s absurd and disturbing. Wth does “feel like a girl or a boy” mean to 1st grader? But I also agree it can’t be discussed here. I think there will be a backlash.

Agree. This attitude is so disappointing. Let kids be themselves, play with the toys they enjoy, read the books they enjoy, participate in activities they enjoy & hang out with other kids whose company they enjoy.
I am 40. If I don’t know what feeling like a girl (or boy) means, how on earth will a 7yr old?

Just think.......
NJ seems to think this is something worthy of teaching when we have a horrendous standing in the world WRT math, science, and even English teaching.
Let's have schools teach academics and leave the gender studies - especially in elementary schools - to the parents - where it belongs.

NJ schools are way better than VA schools.

And there are fewer RWNJs per capita.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

When you don’t have an actual argument . . .

Highlighting a mildly sexist idiom is a counterargument to the actual point? Huh. Learn something new every day, I guess...

It wasn't a mildly sexist comment, it was an extremely sexist comment.

DP. The panties in a bunch? Pearls clutched?

Fcking hysterical snowflakes.

[Anonymous]

How do you talk to a child about “feeling like” a girl or a boy without pointing to regressive stereotypes?

[Anonymous]

I've met progressives who want to cancel Kindergarten Cop for its purportedly transphobic portrayal of gender. I hope they were kidding, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were dead serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Six is just about the age where kids start picking up on stuff going on around them, especially stuff having to do with sex and gender, and start asking questions about it. Really awkward questions, sometimes. Simple explanations of basic anatomy and gender are not only appropriate at that age, but have been standard fare for years and lay the groundwork for important lessons about safety and sexual abuse - "good" and "bad" touching, etc. Acknowledging transgenderism in that framework is not only rational, it can literally be vital to a child's health and safety.

Or, you can keep your panties bunched and your pearls clutched and ride your Pet Moral Panic Of The Week until the next Shiny Object is dangled in front of you. Your choice.

Pretty misogynistic finale there, but no surprise since misogyny lies at the heart of this whole movement.

Well golly, you sure devastated my point there! Wow! Hoo Boy, you sure schooled me, I'll tell ya!

(where's a :jerkit: emoji when you need one)

When you don’t have an actual argument . . .

Highlighting a mildly sexist idiom is a counterargument to the actual point? Huh. Learn something new every day, I guess...

It wasn't a mildly sexist comment, it was an extremely sexist comment.

Okay. Highlighting an extremely sexist idiom is a counterargument to the actual point? Huh. Learn something new every day, I guess...

Happy now?

[Anonymous]

I am over 60 years old. I remember a girl who was taunted for being a "tomboy" when I was in grade school. Believe me, 6 years old is not too young to talk about this kind of stuff. That "girl" never really met her potential in school (and later life) because of this. I doubt that parents talked about it either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I am over 60 years old. I remember a girl who was taunted for being a "tomboy" when I was in grade school. Believe me, 6 years old is not too young to talk about this kind of stuff. That "girl" never really met her potential in school (and later life) because of this. I doubt that parents talked about it either.

My mom was a tomboy growing up. Growing up, she always hung out with the boys, loved sports, and hated girly things. As an adult, my mom identifies as female and heterosexual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've met progressives who want to cancel Kindergarten Cop for its purportedly transphobic portrayal of gender. I hope they were kidding, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were dead serious.

LOL I'd like to "cancel" (whatever that means) Kindergarten Cop for being such a bad movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“I don’t live in New Jersey so this is none of my business”, say all Republicans who believe in states rights and a weak federal government.

This is actually my stance. There has been next to no solid research on transgenderism or gender dysphoria, so at this point, everything is experimental. I don't want my children exposed to any experimentation on it, but that's why I also support red state legislation to prohibit this in schools. If blue states want to do it, knock yourselves out, I hope it goes well.