NJ to teach gender lessons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are all the videos from Rutgers Answers? Because according to their website, the lesson plans are for grades 8-12. While masturbation and porn are awkward conversations, they're also activities that teenagers engage in, whether parents like to admit it or not. It's better that teens have access to accurate information than live in shame.

I don't want teachers discussing these issues with my 8th grader. I'm morally opposed to porn. It's my job as a parent to teach these issues, not my county's. The government does not provide any financial benefits to me for my child and there is no incentive for me to see my child as belonging, in any sense, to the government. This is a nation that considers children to be the sole financial obligation of parents. So they dont get to suddenly @ me with this "takes a village" garbage when it politically suits them.

You can opt your kid out of sex ed.

No big deal.

I'm also opposed to schools, in general, normaling human trafficking and consuming film of people with dubious consent engaging in acts of possible rape. In other words, I'm generally against any state-backed promotion of porn.

Is NJ doing that? No. Good luck keeping your teen boys away from it, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transgender people are only 0.06 % of the population.

In any middle school today it’s about 20%.

The bigots clearly don’t know any young kids today.

Perhaps you don't really know kids today and you should educate yourself more on the topic. The latest Gallup poll showed 20.8% of Gen Z identifies as LGBQT so basically 1 out of 5 kids. It is double the percentage of millennials (10.5%) and Gen X is only 4.2%.

So at the risk of poking the hornet nest, here I go anyway because someone needs to say it.

This isn't good. It is bad that so many young people are reporting this.

I am old enough to remember before.

In the old days gays and lesbians would say that they were otherwise normal men or women that for reasons they didn't understand and didn't choose, were attracted to their own sex. They wanted to be treated with the dignity and respect that any human deserved and allowed to live their lives pursuing love and happiness as they chose.

The initial wave of transpeople were a tiny slice of the population and whether for biological or psychological reasons they felt with absolute conviction that their gender did not match their actual biological sex. They also said that it was absolutely not a choice and was an immutable part of their being that could not be changed.

Now, in the space of a sliver of time in biological terms we have 1 in 5 young adults identifying as LGBTQ and 12% (1 in 8) identifying as something other than a man or a woman. (For comparison, 13-14% of the US population is black.)

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/survey-20-percent-millennials-identify-lgbtq-n740791

If this is biological, then something absolutely massive has changed in only the last few decades.

All of this. Something is clearly wrong.

It is social contagion amongst the girls. It is hipper to be trans than to be a girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Transgender people are only 0.06 % of the population.

In any middle school today it’s about 20%.

The bigots clearly don’t know any young kids today.

Perhaps you don't really know kids today and you should educate yourself more on the topic. The latest Gallup poll showed 20.8% of Gen Z identifies as LGBQT so basically 1 out of 5 kids. It is double the percentage of millennials (10.5%) and Gen X is only 4.2%.

So at the risk of poking the hornet nest, here I go anyway because someone needs to say it.

This isn't good. It is bad that so many young people are reporting this.

I am old enough to remember before.

In the old days gays and lesbians would say that they were otherwise normal men or women that for reasons they didn't understand and didn't choose, were attracted to their own sex. They wanted to be treated with the dignity and respect that any human deserved and allowed to live their lives pursuing love and happiness as they chose.

The initial wave of transpeople were a tiny slice of the population and whether for biological or psychological reasons they felt with absolute conviction that their gender did not match their actual biological sex. They also said that it was absolutely not a choice and was an immutable part of their being that could not be changed.

Now, in the space of a sliver of time in biological terms we have 1 in 5 young adults identifying as LGBTQ and 12% (1 in 8) identifying as something other than a man or a woman. (For comparison, 13-14% of the US population is black.)

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/survey-20-percent-millennials-identify-lgbtq-n740791

If this is biological, then something absolutely massive has changed in only the last few decades.

All of this. Something is clearly wrong.

It is social contagion amongst the girls. It is hipper to be trans than to be a girl.

No, it’s not “hipper”. The vast majority of girls (and boys) are not transgender.

You guys just make crap up because you think it sounds good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

Question: Why did this organization create lessons for NJ, specifically?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

Question: Why did this organization create lessons for NJ, specifically?

They are hoping to sell lesson plans. Just like many other educational content creators. They take their content and map to each school standards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

Question: Why did this organization create lessons for NJ, specifically?

And why were the lesson plans even listed as options if they agreed it should not be taught? How is it a manufactured issue if it came from their own website? Of course now with the backlash they can pretend they were never going to use the plans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

Question: Why did this organization create lessons for NJ, specifically?

They are hoping to sell lesson plans. Just like many other educational content creators. They take their content and map to each school standards.

^ for example…
https://www.hmhco.com/classroom-solutions/states

Florida
https://www.hmhco.com/review/fl-math#k-5-math

California
https://www.hmhco.com/review/california-science

Virginia
https://us.hmhco.com/va/math/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

You don’t even know what you are posting. The videos are in support of the curriculum.

The videos themselves aren’t “lesson plans.”

You are confused. There are multiple companies trying to sell lesson plans.

The OP said that NJ was using the “Pink Purple Blue” lesson plans. That’s what the DP above was referring to.

And the earlier PP was sharing videos from the Rutgers Amaze group.

NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE BEING USED IN NJ SCHOOLS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This video is gross, and should not be shown at school. It’s part of the proposed lesson plans.

They aren’t “proposed lesson plans”.

They are videos produced by Rutgers and support the lessons.

It’s a resource that school districts can use to pull resources that fulfill the standards. That means that they pick and choose relevant materials - they don’t just show kids everything on every website that NJDOE has posted.

Where do you see masturbation or sexual readiness on the list of NJ standards for grade 2?




MANUFACTURED ISSUE.

The no.gov website lists the resources from Rutger’s AMAZE as appropriate for k-12.

The videos are not appropriate for an school age children. If the goal is educating students, cartoons of a child jacking off and instruction on how to “flick the bean” are childish and gross.

The videos are being touted as official resources for nj students k-12. It’s not a manufactured issue.

1) these videos are not for elementary school kids. Just because it says k-12 doesn’t mean that absolutely everything on that website is for K-12.
2) the standards for K-2 definitely do no get into masturbation or sexual readiness.
2) are you being deliberately obtuse? Or are you really dumb AF?

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

DP, but the sample lesson plans specifically go into gender identity for 1st and 2nd graders. In the Understanding Our Bodies lesson plan for 2nd graders it specifically says "some body parts that mostly just girls have and some parts that mostly just boys have. Being a boy or a girl doesn’t have to mean you have those parts, but for most people this is how their bodies are.” In the first grade lesson plan Pink, Blue and Purple it states one of the objectives is for students to be able to define gender, gender identity and gender stereotypes. You can keep tying MANUFACTURED ISSUE all you want but these lesson plans would not have been stated as options if the educators were opposed to it. The NJ governor stated he will order a review and clarify the standards.

Has a single school district said they are using those external lesson plans? No.

Has a single elementary school shown the masturbation video? No.

MANUFACTURED ISSUE

Question: Why did this organization create lessons for NJ, specifically?

And why were the lesson plans even listed as options if they agreed it should not be taught? How is it a manufactured issue if it came from their own website? Of course now with the backlash they can pretend they were never going to use the plans.

School districts *might* use those lesson plans. Westfield only just started looking at the curriculum updates.

But Murphy is going to review. So unbunch your panties.

[Anonymous]

And yet it is kind of interesting that the Rutgers venture made these videos in the hopes NJ schools would buy them in support of the NJ plan. Clearly, they thought they were just channeling what the plans implied.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And yet it is kind of interesting that the Rutgers venture made these videos in the hopes NJ schools would buy them in support of the NJ plan. Clearly, they thought they were just channeling what the plans implied.

Ok. And?

But they aren’t intended for elementary school.

NJ is not showing masturbation videos to K-5.