I don’t disagree with her efforts, but the amount she posts is comical. She post s so much that we now don’t even notice eyesight/screen time/school in the woods lady. |
It's hard to lump those 2 groups together when the teachers at APS are science deniers... |
She'll keep pressing for filters don't pay attention that she as an advocate for special needs according to her board position, has not pressed for advocating special needs support and lawsuits against the crime of forcing special needs students to be at home virtually. Yes it is a crime. |
It's easy. Teachers are also light years ahead of the openschoolsnow science deniers. |
Wow - you really are slow. If you make the schools safe to reopen then more kids can go back - including SN. |
As the special needs board chair... |
How will this work for those students at option schools? Would students with medical issues have to give up their spots at HB, immersion, etc. just because they’re sick? That doesn’t seem right. I |
I think county-wide virtual is inevitable for next year. I hope kids in option schools can keep their spots. |
We could turn some of the option schools into all virtual programs. That would solve a lot of issues, actually. I'm only mostly joking. |
There's a lot of insulting going on in here for a thread that is supposedly pointing out how off kilter another subset of parents are. "Oh look at those crazies over there!" say the crazies over here.
I think there are reasonable people on both sides (not in a Trump way though ha!). But when the hardened people who hate the folks on the other team open their mouths and spew their venom or nonsense, they make their whole team look bad. Blech! And so to someone in the middle (I think that's me -- I haven't decided yet whether to send my kids back or not though I'm glad there's an option), this thread comes off as a sort of self-congratulatory circle jerk for the pro-back-to-school folks. Um, congratulations? TL;DR: Kettle, meet pot. |
you sound obsessed with her. if you're not interested in making schools safer, just carry on! |
no this isn't right at all and very well could lead to a lawsuit. Clearly the open uppers don't care about high risk kids but then they never ever did. |
+ 1000 |
whoever is posting this criticism doesn't have a very good idea of the needs of special needs kids. probably one of the open uppers trying to use special needs kids to fit their open up agenda. |
Eh, maybe, but I just don't see how they can staff a school-based DL option next year. I think its a non-starter. |