Impeachment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From a Republican.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/440160-george-conway-case-for-trumps-impeachment-better-than-nixons

In a series of tweets Tuesday morning, attorney George Conway, husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, said President Trump engaged in misconduct “worse than the misconduct that led to Nixon’s resignation.”

Conway linked to a column by The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent that said alleged attempts by Trump to stymie special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation “impeded the inquiry into not just his conduct, but also into the Russian attack on our political system.”

“Exactly right,” Conway, a frequent Trump critic, wrote Tuesday, citing the president’s oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Also, a Never Trumper.
Conway. LOL!

That’s all you got, eh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From a Republican.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/440160-george-conway-case-for-trumps-impeachment-better-than-nixons

In a series of tweets Tuesday morning, attorney George Conway, husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, said President Trump engaged in misconduct “worse than the misconduct that led to Nixon’s resignation.”

Conway linked to a column by The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent that said alleged attempts by Trump to stymie special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation “impeded the inquiry into not just his conduct, but also into the Russian attack on our political system.”

“Exactly right,” Conway, a frequent Trump critic, wrote Tuesday, citing the president’s oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

Also, a Never Trumper.
Conway. LOL!

That’s all you got, eh?

+1 Pretty pathetic. And ignored the other posts about other Republican legal experts who also thought that Trump's behavior deserved impeachment.

[Anonymous]

Is Obstruction an Impeachable Offense? History Says Yes

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/us/politics/obstruction-impeachable-offense.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

President Trump has been consulting the Constitution. In a Twitter post on Monday, he recited part of Article II, Section 4, the provision that allows Congress to remove federal officials who commit “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Mr. Trump wrote that he had done none of those things: “There were no crimes by me (No Collusion, No Obstruction), so you can’t impeach.”

The president’s analysis had two shortcomings. It misstated the conclusion of the report issued by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, which made no definitive judgment about whether Mr. Trump had violated criminal laws concerning obstruction of justice. And it failed to take account of what the framers meant by “other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The phrase is vague, of course, but it plainly does not encompass every ordinary crime. Rather, it follows two offenses that give a good sense of the kinds of crimes the framers had in mind: treason and bribery. Those are crimes against the state and the justice system that undermine the ability of the government to function.

[Anonymous]

Let it go, it's so freaking pointless. Just vote the idiot out next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let it go, it's so freaking pointless. Just vote the idiot out next year.

Doing the right thing isn't freaking pointless.

Punishing crime and lawlessness is what a functional government does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let it go, it's so freaking pointless. Just vote the idiot out next year.

Doing the right thing isn't freaking pointless.

Punishing crime and lawlessness is what a functional government does.

+1 If Trump weren't so amoral, he would have resigned already, like Nixon did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's see.

First, it was a recount. Then, it was an invalid election because of the RUSSIANS! Then, there was the hope that he would keel over on his own. There was also the hope that he would resign because the Mueller report would be so bad - remember, he was reported to be the "unindicted coconspirator to at least two felonies." Then, you went to impeachment. Then, the 25th amendment. Now, back to impeachment.

The Democrats have been plotting how to get Trump out of office since before he was inaugurated. Looks like impeachment is your only option at this point. But, here's a dirty little secret, folks. Impeachment will not get him out of office.

So, keep plotting and planning your strategy.
Me? I enjoy reading year-old threads that have not come to fruition with all the conspiracy theories and predictions that never happened.

Like this one: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/770328.page

And I'm tired of being held hostage by idiots like you and your fellow 37% who refuse to see that Trump is an unfit, incompetent crook. Go move to a country with an authoritarian dictatorship because that's apparently where you'd be happiest.

(in a whisper voice)......Trump is less authoritarian than Obama was.

Why are you whispering? Because you don't want to embarrass yourself?

Today was actually a red letter day in Trump's Imperial Presidency -

*Jared Kushner, top White House advisor, said the US Government investigation into Russian Government attack on our country was "more harmful" than the attack itself

*WH ordered Carl Kline, the security clearance guy, to ignore a Congressional subpoena to testify, without in even trying to assert any legal justification for the refusal

*IRS did not meet the latest deadline to turn over Trump's taxes, in clear violation of a decades-old statute

*WH announced they plan to fight the Congressional subpoena of Don McGahn -- which is super funny because they already waived privilege

So just today there are four examples of a President and an administration that is now OPENLY MOCKING AND DISREGARDING THE LAW.

Let the Supreme Court decide if the subpoenas are enforceable. Congress believes they are and the Trump administration believes they are not so the final arbiter are the courts.

Based on today's census hearing at SCOTUS, this court, which already had legitimacy issues, is now official part of the kabal.

I think that's what Trump is counting on - that if he just keeps fighting everything until it ends up at the SC, his Roy Cohns in black robes have got his back.

[Anonymous]

And then what? We live in a lawless, authoritarian state?

[Anonymous]

The third Article of Impeachment against Richard Nixon charged him with failing "without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives."

- Bill Kristol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The third Article of Impeachment against Richard Nixon charged him with failing "without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives."

- Bill Kristol

Well, Trump did that twice just today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The third Article of Impeachment against Richard Nixon charged him with failing "without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives."

- Bill Kristol

Ouch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The third Article of Impeachment against Richard Nixon charged him with failing "without lawful cause or excuse to produce papers and things as directed by duly authorized subpoenas issued by the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives."

- Bill Kristol

Ouch.

Wow the conservatives are really going after Trump today.

[Anonymous]

OUCH!

https://www.ruleoflawrepublicans.com/

[Anonymous]

Also this:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And then what? We live in a lawless, authoritarian state?

Yes thats what the Cult 45 conned trumpsters want with their Kleptocrat master like his pal Putin.