250k is not rich, 450K is rich, it's the law and permanent Get Over it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:1. You ever heard of Bloomberg and his salt and soft drink regulations? How about him rejecting food for the homeless because he couldn't tell the fiber, fat, etc. content?

2) Revenue taken by force from the American people, in a lot of cases for unconstitutional programs

3) Never been proposed?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/us/11control.html

4) You miss the Carter years? What about the millions (billions) of dollars spent on electric cars, etc, that are huge losers in the market?

Might I suggest you do a bit of research?

So are you equally as pissed off at the judge who recently ordered a lesbian couple to live apart or lose the custody of one of their kids? The order states the mother is not allowed to have a same-gender adult who is unrelated to her children live in her home. Her husband is not the source of the complaint about the living situation.

So now can a judge tell me I can't have a roommate?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/18/republican-texas-judge-orders-lesbian-couple-to-live-apart-or-lose-children/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. You ever heard of Bloomberg and his salt and soft drink regulations? How about him rejecting food for the homeless because he couldn't tell the fiber, fat, etc. content?

2) Revenue taken by force from the American people, in a lot of cases for unconstitutional programs

3) Never been proposed?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/us/11control.html

4) You miss the Carter years? What about the millions (billions) of dollars spent on electric cars, etc, that are huge losers in the market?

Might I suggest you do a bit of research?

1) Oh I'm sorry, is Bloomberg a federal elected official? No? Okay, STFU then, or don't live in NYC. Problem solved.
2) By force? Did the military show up at your door and threaten you with death? Were you beaten? No? Then STFU. Nearly everyone pays taxes in one form or another. Don't like it? MOVE out of the US. We won't miss you.
3) Again, this is a state initiative. Don't like it? Don't live in CA. Problem solved, STFU.
4) There's good evidence that private lobbyists from the traditional car manufacturers and the oil industry killed the electric car in the 70's, so we'll never know how it would have done in the market over the past 40 years. Time will tell how it does this time. Again, you stupid ass, STFU.

YOU are the moron who hasn't done the research. This is a democracy. Citizens are free to support any initiative or candidate they want and any policy initiatives they want. If someone espouses policy positions you don't like, you don't vote for them. Freedom is not freedom from all government - that is ANARCHY, retard. Want to live in anarchy? I suggest you move to some banana republic somewhere and see how you like it.

applause

[Anonymous]

Why are there so many ignorant twenty-three year olds starting threads on DCUM, and why are they always SOOOO sure of themselves?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. You ever heard of Bloomberg and his salt and soft drink regulations? How about him rejecting food for the homeless because he couldn't tell the fiber, fat, etc. content?

2) Revenue taken by force from the American people, in a lot of cases for unconstitutional programs

3) Never been proposed?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/us/11control.html

4) You miss the Carter years? What about the millions (billions) of dollars spent on electric cars, etc, that are huge losers in the market?

Might I suggest you do a bit of research?

1) Oh I'm sorry, is Bloomberg a federal elected official? No? Okay, STFU then, or don't live in NYC. Problem solved.
2) By force? Did the military show up at your door and threaten you with death? Were you beaten? No? Then STFU. Nearly everyone pays taxes in one form or another. Don't like it? MOVE out of the US. We won't miss you.
3) Again, this is a state initiative. Don't like it? Don't live in CA. Problem solved, STFU.
4) There's good evidence that private lobbyists from the traditional car manufacturers and the oil industry killed the electric car in the 70's, so we'll never know how it would have done in the market over the past 40 years. Time will tell how it does this time. Again, you stupid ass, STFU.

YOU are the moron who hasn't done the research. This is a democracy. Citizens are free to support any initiative or candidate they want and any policy initiatives they want. If someone espouses policy positions you don't like, you don't vote for them. Freedom is not freedom from all government - that is ANARCHY, retard. Want to live in anarchy? I suggest you move to some banana republic somewhere and see how you like it.

Poster, really, take a chill pill or an anger management class. No one wants to hear it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, that's exactly what the law says. It's not a political compromise, it's a definition of rich. Ugh. Please shut up, troll who has posted this 20 times.

Exactly. What else is the government not going to qualify for you? You're being told what to eat, how much it's 'politically correct' to earn. Some states have advocated for putting devices on your house that allows the government to adjust your heat and A/C. You are being told what cars to drive and how much gas you can use. And lots of you think this is fine. Because you don't realize you are losing your freedom, bit by bit.

I'm so glad you want to live in "Freedomland," a fictional version of America where everyone is obese, the air is dense with fog and the rivers burn with pollution, oil and gas have run out, and CEOs earn untaxed billions while the vast working poor toil for pennies (also untaxed, what a victory!). Oh, don't forget the frequent foreign invasions (since Freedomland can't pay for a world-class military due to having zero tax revenue), the daily bridge collapses, the decaying roads and rampant disease (thanks to lack of funding for medical care for the non-rich). Also stick around for the armed robberies (police officers are on the gov't dole, you had to cut them), illiterate populace (ditto teachers!), and vanishing jobs.

IF ONLY WE LIVED IN FREEDOMLAND WHERE GOVERNMENT WEREN'T TRYING TO TELL US WHAT TO DO ALL THE TIME.

+1,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, that's exactly what the law says. It's not a political compromise, it's a definition of rich. Ugh. Please shut up, troll who has posted this 20 times.

Exactly. What else is the government not going to qualify for you? You're being told what to eat, how much it's 'politically correct' to earn. Some states have advocated for putting devices on your house that allows the government to adjust your heat and A/C. You are being told what cars to drive and how much gas you can use. And lots of you think this is fine. Because you don't realize you are losing your freedom, bit by bit.

You sound like America is no longer a good match for you. Maybe it's time to consider some alternatives; I hear Somalia is just lovely this time of year!

So what you are saying is you are fine having the government control all aspects of your life. Why don't you want to be an adult?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:1. You ever heard of Bloomberg and his salt and soft drink regulations? How about him rejecting food for the homeless because he couldn't tell the fiber, fat, etc. content?

2) Revenue taken by force from the American people, in a lot of cases for unconstitutional programs

3) Never been proposed?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/11/us/11control.html

4) You miss the Carter years? What about the millions (billions) of dollars spent on electric cars, etc, that are huge losers in the market?

Might I suggest you do a bit of research?

So are you equally as pissed off at the judge who recently ordered a lesbian couple to live apart or lose the custody of one of their kids? The order states the mother is not allowed to have a same-gender adult who is unrelated to her children live in her home. Her husband is not the source of the complaint about the living situation.

So now can a judge tell me I can't have a roommate?

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/18/republican-texas-judge-orders-lesbian-couple-to-live-apart-or-lose-children/

The article states there's a morality clause in the divorce papers. That's the reason the woman has to move. And it doesn't say 'same-gender adult'. It says any not related by blood or marriage. So if she was hetero and wanted her boyfriend to move in, he would be forced to move as well. Know why those clauses exist? To protect the child from having to deal with shack-ups.

The fact that there are lesbians involved is of no never-mind.

Roach has placed a “morality clause” in Compton’s divorce papers, which forbids Compton from having anyone she is not related to “by blood or marriage” in her home past 9:00 p.m. if the children are present. Same sex marriage is illegal in Texas, so by law, Compton cannot live with Price if she wishes to retain custody of her children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:400K is not rich. That is upper middle class.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:400K is not rich. That is upper middle class.

+1

LOL.