Sure, Jan. Suggested AI guardrails are nebulous goals like, "ethical use" or "fairness." I am going to humbly suggest that legislating morality an obvious trap. |
Are the data centers burning the water? It has to be returned to the environment. Methane gas? Hilarious. |
The data centers are not returning water to the environment as groundwater. |
120 years ago, PP was really upset about the Model T, because all of the buggy whip manufacturers would be put our of business. |
Go for it. If you can acquire sufficient land in close-in Bethesda for a data center, more power to you. |
In Northern Virginia, the water comes from the Potomac. The data centers return that water back to the Potomac. |
I wasn’t being sarcastic and you don’t have an argument other than you don’t like it because you don’t understand it and it scares you. Have a seat. Serious people are discussing this. Your feelings aren’t valid. |
It's like half of these people think "the cloud" is *actually* a cloud that just magically appears for data storage. Deliver me from the Luddites. |
Here you go again, all you do is try and discredit. What exactly is your argument? What is this utopia we are progressing towards? You say I don’t understand. Educate me. |
Hey now, I love cars. But I cannot deny that they have huge environmental and social costs. Not because of buggy whip manufacturers, but because now we have a society where in most places, in order to fully participate, you pretty much have to have a car, and buying and maintaining one is a huge cost. Just another way of keeping us tethered to the machine, I guess. |
Unless you live the city. It's been this way for centuries. Only some can afford to live away from the urban population centers. More can afford it now since cars are cheaper and easier to maintain than horses. |
DP. The industrial revolution has brought more people out of poverty than any other social initiative. |
| Technology advances where it can go, not where it should go. You all saw the Oppenheimer movie. Are we really better off now that there are no constraints on the proliferation of nuclear weapons? What should we make of statements by AI pioneers who are concerned about the implications of AI? (It is the growth of AI that drives the Data Centers, probably more than all the YouTube videos we upload every minute, although that, too is a factor. The fact that DCUM is almost completely text-based means that it does not contribute to the demand very much. So we can all relax!) |
I didn't see it because it was fictional. All technology can be abused. You can use a branch to till the earth. You can shape a stick into a club. Are we really better off with sticks in society? I believe there are constraints on nuclear proliferation. You might not like them, but they exist. |
|
Do you not understand that the date centers in the US use more power than all of the EVs in the entire world?
They negotiate a sweet deal with the power companies and pay much lower rates for their power than you and I do. Then they use so much power and overwhelm the grid and make it operate at maximum capacity, which triples the already high costs for homes. We are subsidizing the data center while billionaires get rich. Laughing at our concerns about building additional data centers in our communities just shows me how ignorant the people are about what these data centers actually do. |