Well that’s not normal |
+1 I would like to hear more about this magical world where everyone has enough money to afford private school tuition. |
I find it incredibly disturbing that you are conflating both rigid parenting with not giving a teen a smartphone and good parenting with allowing a 13 year old to be on Snapchat. I mean, whatever helps you sleep at night, but your kid’s brain is cooked. |
NP. Sure it is, because the majority of us are also addicts just in denial. |
Why not just collect their screens from 8pm to 8am? That’s what we do. We say if they need to contact their parent they can come ask us for it at any time of night. |
So let me get this straight. Mom was texting Jane and this made the friends drop her? Make it make sense. Also the leap from “you don’t let your kid on SM” to “you are super controlling” is bonkers. Are you the PO who let their 15 year old on Snapchat? Have you read any research on the subject of smartphones, social media, and developing brains? |
It’s very normal |
+1. And proves the first pp has very young kids. |
You have it backwards. Jane’s mom is always texting Jane while the group is out and freaking out if they deviate from the plans, even a little. The other kids are over it and don’t want to hang out with Jane anymore outside of school and have stopped inviting her places because of her mother. |
DP, and I don't actually believe this story is truthful, but it's also irrelevant. This thread isn't about how much freedom you give kids to go out with friends. It's about access to social media. In your story, we don't even know if "Jane" has social media. She obviously has a phone, as her mom uses it to text her constantly as well as to track her location and hound her about it. So your story is about one kid who had a controlling mom who uses technology to control and limit her kid. It has nothing to do with social media. Meanwhile, within that group of girls, I bet they have varying access to social media and that they gained that access at different times. At least that's how it is in my DD's group. Some parents are more limiting and some parents don't limit at all. It generally does not impact the fact of the girl's friendship, and if a friend for instance doesn't have a certain app (like my DD, who does not have access to TikTok and has only limited IG access through a heavily monitored account), they don't view it as an issue. When they make plans, they text, and all the girls have access to text/chat (as do all of the girls' parents). Also, I don't think of the more restrictive parents at "controlling" nor the less restrictive parents as "lax." They are all great girls and I think the parents mostly share similar values. Rather, I think the girls are different and need different things, and there are varying parenting styles that give the girls what they need in different ways. At least so far, I don't see any behavior that would concern me or make me worry about my child's friendship with these girls, despite these differences in parenting approach. |
An HOUR of YouTube shorts every day and you think you’re protecting your kids? Are you somehow unaware that the YouTube short content is just slightly dated TikTok content (as are Insta reels). |
You are so up to speed |
|
Social media is here to stay.
The trick is to teach your children how to use it. Once they go off to college or move out from your house they need experience understanding the good, bad & ugly. That all said you own their phones until they start paying for them. However, taking away their phones for them not doing chores or some other thing that has nothing to do with social media is bad parenting. I also think if a kid has a phone I would check it periodically, it is not a diary. Kids need to understand there is a time and place for phones and social media. |
Okay. You certainly posted a long reply to a story that you believe to be made up so there is no point in responding. You have it figured out. And I guess it’s not relevant anyway, right? |
| Imma dog imma mutt |