Your thoughts on Stephen Miller accusing dems of using rhetoric 'to mark people'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Hitler came to power in 1933. Jews were stripped of citizenship in Germany 2 years later. It wasn't until 1938 that the violence intensified. It starts with the rhetoric of those in power. Many of us are seeing the warning signs now- not just what devolved in Germany, but also the dirty war in Argentina.

Stephen Miller has no qualms with the human rights violations happening now against non-citizens in the US. At some point he (and this administration) will be tried for this. I'm sorry you have only been raised on movies and lack the ability to think critically.

You're just restating the narrative. Hitler rose to power and now Trump is rising to power and he needs to be stopped before he murders millions of people!

Except he's made no statements about wanting to murder people. He isnt going to trap everyone in the US as another current thread suggests. He isnt going to put black people in camps as Kamala suggested. This is all 100% grade A bullshit cooked up to justify violence. That's all you're doing, creating a pretext for violence. And with all the assassination attempts, and now a successful assassination, you are all still so propagandized that you haven't stopped to ask yourself basic questions like, why is Trump being compared to Hitler vs someone more like him, such as Berlusconi? Berlusconi was a criminal, extremely similar to Trump down to his background in business and penchant for young ladies. But, you all keep saying HITLER. And you all say it, the same things over and over like you're in a trance.

Sounds like Katie has joined the chat. Your husband sucks. And your side’s rhetoric marked Melissa Hortman. If you want us to stop calling you fascists, stop stuffing roofing crews into unmarked cars and deploying the national guard into US cities.

[Anonymous]

He said that Trump is going after all the left wing terrorist groups like antifa…. Ok, what about the other left wing terrorist groups? There aren’t any? Idiot

[Anonymous]

Dems are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems are.

Republicans have used this rhetoric too and you know it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems are.

Republicans have used this rhetoric too and you know it.

DP. They sure have! And here are some receipts. Below is a compilation of SM posts from Stephen Miller calling Dems...fascists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Naziferatu.

Good one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

So, I'm an ignoramus, can someone here please define for me what exactly is "stochastic terrorism" because I have tried hard to search online and I just can't figure it out. What exactly does this mean - "Stochastic terrorism refers to the use of inflammatory rhetoric by public figures that indirectly incites violence against targeted individuals or groups, often resulting in unpredictable acts of violence."

And here's the other thing. Every other Republican being called a Nazi and Hitler. Heck no. While I disagree with many, I wouldn't call many Republicans by those names. But, there are certainly many that fall into DJT's orbit that fit that bill and probably their leader in chief is Stephen Miller. While you can say that he hasn't directly killed a single person, his vile speech is leading IMO. This quote today from a speech in Memphis can be interpreted in a few different ways, but I see this as a call to turn law enforcement loose: “I see the guns and badges in this room. You are unleashed. The handcuffs you’re carrying, they’re not on you anymore, they’re on the criminals. And whatever you need to get it done, we’re gonna get it done.”

So, call me what you will, but Stephen Miller is not a good guy, he is evil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Whatever The guys is a self avowed white surpremacist who wants to destroy the government. If he weren't Trump's advisor, I wouldn't listen to anything that skinhead says.

If this guy were some sort of example of white superiority, I'd guess the white race is in dire straits. He looks like the weakest link. Every time I see him I think of Gollum from Lord of the Rings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Hitler came to power in 1933. Jews were stripped of citizenship in Germany 2 years later. It wasn't until 1938 that the violence intensified. It starts with the rhetoric of those in power. Many of us are seeing the warning signs now- not just what devolved in Germany, but also the dirty war in Argentina.

Stephen Miller has no qualms with the human rights violations happening now against non-citizens in the US. At some point he (and this administration) will be tried for this. I'm sorry you have only been raised on movies and lack the ability to think critically.

You're just restating the narrative. Hitler rose to power and now Trump is rising to power and he needs to be stopped before he murders millions of people!

Except he's made no statements about wanting to murder people. He isnt going to trap everyone in the US as another current thread suggests. He isnt going to put black people in camps as Kamala suggested. This is all 100% grade A bullshit cooked up to justify violence. That's all you're doing, creating a pretext for violence. And with all the assassination attempts, and now a successful assassination, you are all still so propagandized that you haven't stopped to ask yourself basic questions like, why is Trump being compared to Hitler vs someone more like him, such as Berlusconi? Berlusconi was a criminal, extremely similar to Trump down to his background in business and penchant for young ladies. But, you all keep saying HITLER. And you all say it, the same things over and over like you're in a trance.

Sounds like Katie has joined the chat. Your husband sucks. And your side’s rhetoric marked Melissa Hortman. If you want us to stop calling you fascists, stop stuffing roofing crews into unmarked cars and deploying the national guard into US cities.

+1. I hope someone chalks your sidewalk with inspiring, pro democracy messages every day, Katie. And I hope your kids see it too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Stephen Miller has espoused racist and white supremacist views since high school. I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. I’m not going to ignore reality and evidence to mollify you.

[Anonymous]

Katie is just as weird and evil as her husband.

She describes him as:
“A sexual matador”
“An incredibly inspiring man who gets me going in the morning with his speeches, being like, let’s start the day. I’m going to defeat the left and we are going to win.”
“He wakes up everyday ready to carry out the mission that President Trump was elected to do.”

She told journalist Jacob Soboroff:
“Even after having kids, I wouldn’t reconsider my stance on family separations at the border.”

DHS sent her to the border “to see the separations for myself — to try to make me more compassionate — but it didn’t work.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Stephen Miller has espoused racist and white supremacist views since high school. I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. I’m not going to ignore reality and evidence to mollify you.

You're right, we should not call them Hitler or Nazis. This is a new kind of evil that is unraveling but don't have a great name for yet.

[Anonymous]

I just checked this thread again and saw that people think Im Steve Miller's wife? Okay first of all no, I'm drastically out of his league. Second of all, just no. I'm a rando who believes everything that I wrote, as many people on the right do- we are becoming very concerned about left wing terrorism and the dehumanizing rhetoric (calling everyone Hitler, Nazi, fascist, etc) that appears to be fueling the violence. No one is a fascist, no one is going to trap you in the US (trust me, youre welcome to leave), no one is going to kill you or put you in a concentration camp. So don't kill us, please. Good night.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Stephen Miller has espoused racist and white supremacist views since high school. I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make. I’m not going to ignore reality and evidence to mollify you.

You say this, but can't provide any evidence. And you don't need to because everyone repeats it so often that you just believe it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Naziferatu.

Good one.