Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Your thoughts on Stephen Miller accusing dems of using rhetoric 'to mark people'"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence. [/quote] Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.[/quote] It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of[b] stochastic terrorism[/b] to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. [b]Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler.[/b] So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations? And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).[/quote] So, I'm an ignoramus, can someone here please define for me what exactly is "stochastic terrorism" because I have tried hard to search online and I just can't figure it out. What exactly does this mean - "Stochastic terrorism refers to the use of inflammatory rhetoric by public figures that indirectly incites violence against targeted individuals or groups, often resulting in unpredictable acts of violence." And here's the other thing. Every other Republican being called a Nazi and Hitler. Heck no. While I disagree with many, I wouldn't call many Republicans by those names. But, there are certainly many that fall into DJT's orbit that fit that bill and probably their leader in chief is Stephen Miller. While you can say that he hasn't directly killed a single person, his vile speech is leading IMO. This quote today from a speech in Memphis can be interpreted in a few different ways, but I see this as a call to turn law enforcement loose: “I see the guns and badges in this room. You are unleashed. The handcuffs you’re carrying, they’re not on you anymore, they’re on the criminals. And whatever you need to get it done, we’re gonna get it done.” So, call me what you will, but Stephen Miller is not a good guy, he is evil. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics