Your thoughts on Stephen Miller accusing dems of using rhetoric 'to mark people'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what he’s doing today instead of atoning?

He has kids, right? If he does, oh my help them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Can you tell us how he's not a white surpremacist and fascist?

I will happily change my opinion of him if you can show me examples of him embracing multiculturalism and democracy.

If you're going to level charges like that, you are the one who needs to bring evidence. Your brain is so cooked, you can't even challenge your own "thoughts."

Stop using AI to generate your replies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Miller is a self-proclaimed white supremecist and self-proclaimed fascist. Everyone knows that, even you.
Might as well be loud and proud of it.

Prove it.

DP- I don’t think he ever said that, but he spends a LOT of time pushing their agenda if he isn’t one.

: In 2019, the SPLC published emails exchanged between Miller and former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh while Miller was a staffer for then-Senator Jeff Sessions. In the emails, Miller recommended far-right and white nationalist websites like American Renaissance and VDARE, and he promoted the racist novel The Camp of the Saints

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/alleged-stephen-miller-emails-reference-white-nationalist-and-anti-immigrant-perspectives

I would argue, as many others do, that SPLC is an extremist outlet promoting hate against right wing figures. They targeted Charlie Kirk with similar rhetoric. When faced with lawsuits, they always fold because they are lying.

But like 10 minutes ago, you honestly and completely believed that S Miller was a self proclaimed fascist and white supremacist, and that "everyone" knows that. Doesnt that disturb you, that you believed something to be certain that was completely false?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Can you tell us how he's not a white surpremacist and fascist?

I will happily change my opinion of him if you can show me examples of him embracing multiculturalism and democracy.

If you're going to level charges like that, you are the one who needs to bring evidence. Your brain is so cooked, you can't even challenge your own "thoughts."

Stop using AI to generate your replies

I'm not. I encourage you to use an AI detector.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Can you tell us how he's not a white surpremacist and fascist?

I will happily change my opinion of him if you can show me examples of him embracing multiculturalism and democracy.

If you're going to level charges like that, you are the one who needs to bring evidence. Your brain is so cooked, you can't even challenge your own "thoughts."

Stop using AI to generate your replies

Here, run my words through this. https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector

I'm not a bot.

[Anonymous]

I am tired of everything being about a fight or a war and that we desperately need to change everything in society. It's just a constant process of whipping people up into hysterics and paranoia. It's so obviously the viewpoint of someone who wants more power and nothing more. It's a rhetorical technique and a proven method that works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Hitler came to power in 1933. Jews were stripped of citizenship in Germany 2 years later. It wasn't until 1938 that the violence intensified. It starts with the rhetoric of those in power. Many of us are seeing the warning signs now- not just what devolved in Germany, but also the dirty war in Argentina.

Stephen Miller has no qualms with the human rights violations happening now against non-citizens in the US. At some point he (and this administration) will be tried for this. I'm sorry you have only been raised on movies and lack the ability to think critically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Miller is a self-proclaimed white supremecist and self-proclaimed fascist. Everyone knows that, even you.
Might as well be loud and proud of it.

Prove it.

DP- I don’t think he ever said that, but he spends a LOT of time pushing their agenda if he isn’t one.

: In 2019, the SPLC published emails exchanged between Miller and former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh while Miller was a staffer for then-Senator Jeff Sessions. In the emails, Miller recommended far-right and white nationalist websites like American Renaissance and VDARE, and he promoted the racist novel The Camp of the Saints

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/alleged-stephen-miller-emails-reference-white-nationalist-and-anti-immigrant-perspectives

I would argue, as many others do, that SPLC is an extremist outlet promoting hate against right wing figures. They targeted Charlie Kirk with similar rhetoric. When faced with lawsuits, they always fold because they are lying.

But like 10 minutes ago, you honestly and completely believed that S Miller was a self proclaimed fascist and white supremacist, and that "everyone" knows that. Doesnt that disturb you, that you believed something to be certain that was completely false?

Like, no I didn’t say that. Because like, DP means different poster. Do you know what SPLC means? While we are talking about definitions, I would argue that extremist means: a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
They didn’t do much but uncover emails Miller wrote, so it doesn’t matter much who they are. He still wrote them and promoted those views which is germane to the actual thread here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

Hitler came to power in 1933. Jews were stripped of citizenship in Germany 2 years later. It wasn't until 1938 that the violence intensified. It starts with the rhetoric of those in power. Many of us are seeing the warning signs now- not just what devolved in Germany, but also the dirty war in Argentina.

Stephen Miller has no qualms with the human rights violations happening now against non-citizens in the US. At some point he (and this administration) will be tried for this. I'm sorry you have only been raised on movies and lack the ability to think critically.

You're just restating the narrative. Hitler rose to power and now Trump is rising to power and he needs to be stopped before he murders millions of people!

Except he's made no statements about wanting to murder people. He isnt going to trap everyone in the US as another current thread suggests. He isnt going to put black people in camps as Kamala suggested. This is all 100% grade A bullshit cooked up to justify violence. That's all you're doing, creating a pretext for violence. And with all the assassination attempts, and now a successful assassination, you are all still so propagandized that you haven't stopped to ask yourself basic questions like, why is Trump being compared to Hitler vs someone more like him, such as Berlusconi? Berlusconi was a criminal, extremely similar to Trump down to his background in business and penchant for young ladies. But, you all keep saying HITLER. And you all say it, the same things over and over like you're in a trance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Miller is a self-proclaimed white supremecist and self-proclaimed fascist. Everyone knows that, even you.
Might as well be loud and proud of it.

Prove it.

DP- I don’t think he ever said that, but he spends a LOT of time pushing their agenda if he isn’t one.

: In 2019, the SPLC published emails exchanged between Miller and former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh while Miller was a staffer for then-Senator Jeff Sessions. In the emails, Miller recommended far-right and white nationalist websites like American Renaissance and VDARE, and he promoted the racist novel The Camp of the Saints

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/alleged-stephen-miller-emails-reference-white-nationalist-and-anti-immigrant-perspectives

I would argue, as many others do, that SPLC is an extremist outlet promoting hate against right wing figures. They targeted Charlie Kirk with similar rhetoric. When faced with lawsuits, they always fold because they are lying.

But like 10 minutes ago, you honestly and completely believed that S Miller was a self proclaimed fascist and white supremacist, and that "everyone" knows that. Doesnt that disturb you, that you believed something to be certain that was completely false?

Like, no I didn’t say that. Because like, DP means different poster. Do you know what SPLC means? While we are talking about definitions, I would argue that extremist means: a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
They didn’t do much but uncover emails Miller wrote, so it doesn’t matter much who they are. He still wrote them and promoted those views which is germane to the actual thread here.

I assume youre talking about noted litigation target, southern poverty law center, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Calling someone names (or describing their actions and viewpoints accurately) on an anonymous message board is not stochastic terrorism.

It's a symptom of the left's persistent use of stochastic terrorism to mark people for assassination. On this thread, Stephen Miller was likened to Hitler. Like you all, I was raised on movies like Valkyrie which praised violent resistance against Hitler-- which I want to be clear, is totally morally acceptable. Hitler was a deranged mass murderer. Stephen Miller hasn't killed a single person, much less millions like Hitler. Yet he, like every other republican, is constantly being called a Nazi and Hitler. So in a society that's been conditioned through Hollywood movies and college ethics class dilemmas to consider it morally acceptable, or even morally obligatory to kill such people-- what exactly do you expect to happen other than assassinations?

And here's what's worse- this rhetoric is so pervasive, you're no longer able to critically analyze whether people are actually Nazis or white supremacists. That part of your brain has shut down. It's like when people at war are encouraged to call the enemy H@jjis or J@ps. That's all this is. You're giving Republicans a label so you don't see them as human and can kill them easily. Just look at how the left cheered Kirk's death because he was a "white supremacist" (no he wasn't, yall are tripping).

If you're going to (rightfully) attribute all the deaths and murders that occurred under Hitlers orders to him, you cannot then rightfully state that Stephen Miller hasn't killed anyone. This regime has absolutely killed people, and Stephen Miller is one of the people running the show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Miller is a self-proclaimed white supremecist and self-proclaimed fascist. Everyone knows that, even you.
Might as well be loud and proud of it.

Prove it.

DP- I don’t think he ever said that, but he spends a LOT of time pushing their agenda if he isn’t one.

: In 2019, the SPLC published emails exchanged between Miller and former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh while Miller was a staffer for then-Senator Jeff Sessions. In the emails, Miller recommended far-right and white nationalist websites like American Renaissance and VDARE, and he promoted the racist novel The Camp of the Saints

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/alleged-stephen-miller-emails-reference-white-nationalist-and-anti-immigrant-perspectives

I would argue, as many others do, that SPLC is an extremist outlet promoting hate against right wing figures. They targeted Charlie Kirk with similar rhetoric. When faced with lawsuits, they always fold because they are lying.

But like 10 minutes ago, you honestly and completely believed that S Miller was a self proclaimed fascist and white supremacist, and that "everyone" knows that. Doesnt that disturb you, that you believed something to be certain that was completely false?

Like, no I didn’t say that. Because like, DP means different poster. Do you know what SPLC means? While we are talking about definitions, I would argue that extremist means: a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
They didn’t do much but uncover emails Miller wrote, so it doesn’t matter much who they are. He still wrote them and promoted those views which is germane to the actual thread here.

I assume youre talking about noted litigation target, southern poverty law center, right?

Good work! You DO know some abbreviations! Way to go! Now, let’s return to the topic of the thread. All SPLC did was uncover the emails Miller wrote. They didn’t AI them, they didn’t write them, they just made them public information. He wrote them and was spreading white supremacist propaganda. Which brings us back to the point you are trying to wiggle away from: If he isn’t a white supremacist, why does he spend time trying to spread their beliefs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Miller is a self-proclaimed white supremecist and self-proclaimed fascist. Everyone knows that, even you.
Might as well be loud and proud of it.

Prove it.

DP- I don’t think he ever said that, but he spends a LOT of time pushing their agenda if he isn’t one.

: In 2019, the SPLC published emails exchanged between Miller and former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh while Miller was a staffer for then-Senator Jeff Sessions. In the emails, Miller recommended far-right and white nationalist websites like American Renaissance and VDARE, and he promoted the racist novel The Camp of the Saints

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/alleged-stephen-miller-emails-reference-white-nationalist-and-anti-immigrant-perspectives

I would argue, as many others do, that SPLC is an extremist outlet promoting hate against right wing figures. They targeted Charlie Kirk with similar rhetoric. When faced with lawsuits, they always fold because they are lying.

But like 10 minutes ago, you honestly and completely believed that S Miller was a self proclaimed fascist and white supremacist, and that "everyone" knows that. Doesnt that disturb you, that you believed something to be certain that was completely false?

Like, no I didn’t say that. Because like, DP means different poster. Do you know what SPLC means? While we are talking about definitions, I would argue that extremist means: a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
They didn’t do much but uncover emails Miller wrote, so it doesn’t matter much who they are. He still wrote them and promoted those views which is germane to the actual thread here.

I assume youre talking about noted litigation target, southern poverty law center, right?

Good work! You DO know some abbreviations! Way to go! Now, let’s return to the topic of the thread. All SPLC did was uncover the emails Miller wrote. They didn’t AI them, they didn’t write them, they just made them public information. He wrote them and was spreading white supremacist propaganda. Which brings us back to the point you are trying to wiggle away from: If he isn’t a white supremacist, why does he spend time trying to spread their beliefs?

Show me where in the emails he spread white supremacist beliefs. Specifically. You're pointing to SPLC and when I said they were not credible, you just called me dumb (paraphrased) and suggested I didn't know what SPCL was. So you never engaged with my argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what he’s doing today instead of atoning?

He has kids, right? If he does, oh my help them

Probably not biologically.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, I mean just look at this thread. He's called a white supremacist, a fascist, etc. None of which is true, but this is what the left does- stochastic terrorism that leads to real violence.

Miller is a self-proclaimed white supremecist and self-proclaimed fascist. Everyone knows that, even you.
Might as well be loud and proud of it.

Prove it.

DP- I don’t think he ever said that, but he spends a LOT of time pushing their agenda if he isn’t one.

: In 2019, the SPLC published emails exchanged between Miller and former Breitbart editor Katie McHugh while Miller was a staffer for then-Senator Jeff Sessions. In the emails, Miller recommended far-right and white nationalist websites like American Renaissance and VDARE, and he promoted the racist novel The Camp of the Saints

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/alleged-stephen-miller-emails-reference-white-nationalist-and-anti-immigrant-perspectives

I would argue, as many others do, that SPLC is an extremist outlet promoting hate against right wing figures. They targeted Charlie Kirk with similar rhetoric. When faced with lawsuits, they always fold because they are lying.

But like 10 minutes ago, you honestly and completely believed that S Miller was a self proclaimed fascist and white supremacist, and that "everyone" knows that. Doesnt that disturb you, that you believed something to be certain that was completely false?

Like, no I didn’t say that. Because like, DP means different poster. Do you know what SPLC means? While we are talking about definitions, I would argue that extremist means: a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.
They didn’t do much but uncover emails Miller wrote, so it doesn’t matter much who they are. He still wrote them and promoted those views which is germane to the actual thread here.

I assume youre talking about noted litigation target, southern poverty law center, right?

Good work! You DO know some abbreviations! Way to go! Now, let’s return to the topic of the thread. All SPLC did was uncover the emails Miller wrote. They didn’t AI them, they didn’t write them, they just made them public information. He wrote them and was spreading white supremacist propaganda. Which brings us back to the point you are trying to wiggle away from: If he isn’t a white supremacist, why does he spend time trying to spread their beliefs?

Show me where in the emails he spread white supremacist beliefs. Specifically. You're pointing to SPLC and when I said they were not credible, you just called me dumb (paraphrased) and suggested I didn't know what SPCL was. So you never engaged with my argument.

Oh geez. Look, babe, the dot matrix printer is on the fritz so I can’t print them and mail them to you. You seem to enjoy questioning sources, and I can’t provide you with the email from the server. I, in fact, liked you to a PBS news hour segment where they HAD seen the emails. There is both a transcript and a video of the segment. If you find PBS newshour too “extremist” for you, we can’t have a conversation and THAT, babe is the real issue in this country. We lost the fairness doctrine and we can’t agree on original sources anymore.