What do you think about tattoos?

[Anonymous]

Patterns on the skin are the symbol of demons possessed by Gwi-ma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Compared to the past, it seems like lots of young adults today have at least some tattoo around them. Curious what other people think about them, though I think its a solid 50/50 where people either like or dislike them.

White trash. I had some one apply for a job who was tattooed on her arms, neck, and face. I gave her a perfunctory interview and sent her on her way.

Racist bigot!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Compared to the past, it seems like lots of young adults today have at least some tattoo around them. Curious what other people think about them, though I think it’s a solid 50/50 where people either like or dislike them.

Depends on where you look. I teach at med school and nursing (bachelors) school.
Nurse students have tattoos.
MD students do not.

[Anonymous]

I wouldn’t get them myself, but for others neither like nor dislike - I don’t care either way what other people do. I would notice when it’s extensive like the whole leg or arm or back are covered, but otherwise don’t pay much attention.

[Anonymous]

Gwi-ma

[Anonymous]

I rarely see ones I like. But a fit man with gorgeously done half sleeves and nothing else is hot AF. I do prefer the beauty of the human body, and tattoos make it hard to distinguish the muscle definition. Never cover up that vein men get on their bicep. Drool…

[Anonymous]

Very trashy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Very trashy.

Not really. If you read up on the history of tattooing you'll find the biggest fans of it in the early 1900s were the British aristocracy, they had entire landscapes tattooed across their backs (the land they owned, usually).

[Anonymous]

I still think they are tacky same as I did when I was a teenager.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very trashy.

Not really. If you read up on the history of tattooing you'll find the biggest fans of it in the early 1900s were the British aristocracy, they had entire landscapes tattooed across their backs (the land they owned, usually).

That sounds trashy!

[Anonymous]

Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Compared to the past, it seems like lots of young adults today have at least some tattoo around them. Curious what other people think about them, though I think it’s a solid 50/50 where people either like or dislike them.

Depends on where you look. I teach at med school and nursing (bachelors) school.
Nurse students have tattoos.
MD students do not.

Stop the lies. Tons of doctors have full sleeves or more.

[Anonymous]

It's a good sign of intelligence, or lack thereof in this case.

[Anonymous]

OP, dcum is not a good representative sample, especially on this topic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very trashy.

Not really. If you read up on the history of tattooing you'll find the biggest fans of it in the early 1900s were the British aristocracy, they had entire landscapes tattooed across their backs (the land they owned, usually).

The reason for these tattoos was that when the aristocrat passed out at a bar, the Uber driver would know where to take him.