Inaugural Prayer Service - reactions are telling

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why was he in church? This isn’t a thing for him or his wife, or Mr. and Mrs. Vance. Doubt they’ve been inside a church for services ever.

He was there because he thinks he's God.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I felt like that church service wasn't the time or place to preach that. It felt disrespectful.


What is "that"? To love your neighbor? To have mercy on those suffering? I think you've lost true meaning of Christianity.

She didn't ask them to understand and rally around the LGBTQ community. She asked for them to have mercy.


Weird, that Trump, an atheist, is having his unseemly behavior defended by supposedly religious people.


Who's defending him?


Poster on 1/22/25 at 15:37: "I felt like that church service wasn't the time or place to preach that. It felt disrespectful."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This is what everyone gets for going along with building a pretend National Church and holding government functions there to further the charade.


It's not a national church. It's the seat of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, DC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Very brave individual.


Yes, she's brave. But it was her church, after all.

I look forward to the day when there is no prayer service after a presidential inauguration.

Especially for an atheist, like Trump.


It's fine if a president requests a prayer service, but it should not be automatic. Remember: separation of church and state.



Good one. In a country where the head of state is sworn in with his hand on a bible and the currency has "in god we trust" printed on it.


There is minimal separation despite it all. It was telling when he did not put his hand on the bible.


He knew that it would burst into flames if he touched it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Transgender ppl fearing for their lives? I thought it was a bit dramatic.


You don't get out much, do you? If you really believe that transgender people are not at risk under the current administration, then you're not paying any attention at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is what everyone gets for going along with building a pretend National Church and holding government functions there to further the charade.


It's not a national church. It's the seat of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, DC.


It's also where national events are held, like Jimmy Carter's Funeral .

And George Washington himself - according to the guided tour I got of the Cathedral - decided that a National Cathedral should be built there, on the highest hill in Washington.
Anonymous
And it's called The Washington National Cathedral https://cathedral.org
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I felt like that church service wasn't the time or place to preach that. It felt disrespectful.


It was disrespectful, and rightly so.
no it was not

A minister’s job is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. She did her job.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I felt like that church service wasn't the time or place to preach that. It felt disrespectful.


It was disrespectful, and rightly so.
no it was not

A minister’s job is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. She did her job.


+1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is what everyone gets for going along with building a pretend National Church and holding government functions there to further the charade.


It's not a national church. It's the seat of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington, DC.


It's also where national events are held, like Jimmy Carter's Funeral .

And George Washington himself - according to the guided tour I got of the Cathedral - decided that a National Cathedral should be built there, on the highest hill in Washington.


All well and good, but it's not a "national church."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And it's called The Washington National Cathedral https://cathedral.org


https://cathedral.org/discover/history/

"The idea for a sacred home for all Americans in the nation’s capital is as old as the country itself. Pierre L’Enfant’s original design for the new capital city included a “great church for national purposes,” an idea that sat idle until a congressional charter authorized a cathedral dedicated to religion, education and charity, in 1893. Construction began in 1907, when President Theodore Roosevelt helped lay the foundation stone. Through world wars, the Great Depression and immense social change, construction ended exactly 83 years after it began, when President George H.W. Bush oversaw the laying of the final stone atop the towers, in 1990.

The Cathedral is an active member of The Episcopal Church and is supported by generous donors from across the globe; we receive no direct support from the federal government or any national church body."
Anonymous
Yeah, Jesus preachers should stick to the facts, lol!
Anonymous
If Jesus showed up in today's America we would deport him to Guantanamo and then put tariffs on heaven if God does not take him back, lol!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-resolution/59/text

Unbelievable.


Clicking on the link:

119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 59

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the sermon given by the Right Reverend Mariann Edgar Budde at the National Prayer Service on January 21st, 2025, at the National Cathedral was a display of political activism and condemning its distorted message.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 23, 2025
Mr. Brecheen (for himself, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Burlison, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Harris of North Carolina, Mrs. Bice, Mrs. Luna, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Ogles, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mr. Norman, Mr. Webster of Florida, Mr. Allen, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Houchin, Ms. Van Duyne, Mr. Baird, Mrs. Biggs of South Carolina, Ms. Boebert, and Mr. Griffith) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the sermon given by the Right Reverend Mariann Edgar Budde at the National Prayer Service on January 21st, 2025, at the National Cathedral was a display of political activism and condemning its distorted message.

Whereas the National Prayer Service is a longstanding tradition in which the United States publicly affirms dependence upon God and prays for the success of our President and Vice President;

Whereas, on January 21, 2025, President Donald J. Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance took part in the National Prayer Service at the National Cathedral in Washington, DC; and

Whereas the Right Reverend Mariann Edgar Budde, the bishop leading the inaugural prayer service, used her position inappropriately, promoting political bias instead of advocating the full counsel of biblical teaching: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That—

(1) it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the sermon given at the National Prayer Service on January 21st, 2025, at the National Cathedral was a display of political activism; and

(2) the House of Representatives condemns the Right Reverend Mariann Edgar Budde’s distorted message.
post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: