T25s that are still TO maybe? |
Yeah, see how that goes |
As they should be. Wake Forest is meh. But keep boosting! |
But Rutgers and BU are...what exactly? Not meh? |
Better than Wake Forest. 🤣 |
Harvard is not TO right now. Two of the other three will not be TO next year, already announced. |
You would think they should be able to figure out at least this much, right.
|
Interesting. Johns Hopkins stands out as overrated and Georgetown stands out as underrated… |
Georgetown's US News rank is higher than its rank on this list where it lands at around #26. Wake Forest and co. are the real underrated schools. |
As others have noted- Georgetown is not test optional so the average is lower. Same goes for Dartmouth and some other schools. Probably makes sense to add or subtract 10 SAT points per 10 pct TO. Set every school to 70 pct submitted. At least for the top 25 |
I agree with that completely. My post was regarding the OP of the thread. |
OP here - I wonder actually if the rankings themselves drive the correlation and are in a way self fulfilling- people have individual preferences on the margin but everyone generally wants to attend the highest ranked school possible - so the higher the ranking, the more interest - and the most highly ranked schools end up with the highest test score profile - because all things being equal a school is going to prefer a high test score to a low one if it has an abundance of applicants from which to choose. It’s also clear that schools recognize the competitive need to have a strong test score profile and within the context of their institutional priorities they make sure they are getting their numbers up as high as they can At the end of the day test scores are the only objective statistic they have to work with to demonstrate their superiority |
Wrong again. Look at William and Mary—they have the same incoming test stats as UVA—how do you account for this? Look at Wake Forest—much higher stats than their ranking superior Rutgers University in New Jersey—how do you account for this? |
Columbia has nearly 9000 undergraduate students. No way that 1800 of them are athletes. Maybe at SLACs, but not larger schools. |
Whare are SLACs? Are they not worthy to be ranked? |