Saying no to proposed APS spending does not make the person a POS or “F the kids.” Again liberals demonizing people who disagree with them. I get that this is what you believe Donald Trump does (as do I) but you cannot recognize it in yourselves. |
Amen (and I am in NA). |
Oh come on. Everything doesnt have to be rubber stamped. |
There is no rational reason to block basic school upgrades. |
Ok. But HVACs? Roofs? Kitchens? And yes, the career center updates. It’s really disgusting that adults are willing to use kids as pawns because they’re still butthurt about the pandemic. |
They have packaged it this way to get the Montessori stuff passed. Grow up. |
TJ and Gunston both need to be rebuilt. Especially TJ, largely windowless. Historic but aging schools like Barcroft and Barrett need major renovations and code upgrades. |
That’s only part of the package. We shouldn’t do any of these infrastructure updates because you don’t like option schools? Option schools educate APS kids FFS. Do you even have kids in APS? |
Most of the bond is for MPSA. APS could do more repairs but they decided to build another temple to option programs. |
How did that happen? Probably due to popular support for the school? Career Center/tech and H-B are also wildly popular schools. Since this is likely the last major building program for a while, didn’t staff and school board look at all the pros and cons of this bond package? While a facilities report was also completed not to long ago that ranked facilities and made recommendations for rebuilds or renovations, I’m not sure how that factored into the bond. |
I voted no on all the bonds except storm water. Eff AC they are going to kill deer. And they was shooting much money on marginal crap. Try getting their newsletters and broaden your view of County spending beyond schools. |
I absolutely hate the way the wording for bonds is done. It's always written in general terms for good things that obviously people will want/feel need to support.
Bonds always always always (with what, one exception) have passed by large majorities. I've been voting "no" on most of them more and more over the past several years because I believe Arlington "leadership" and governance needs to change. They need to stop taking blanket support for granted for whatever they want to do and however they want to do it. they need to start being more thoughtful, strategic, and collaborative with their budgeting and resources. The more "no" votes they get, ethe better the chance they start taking notice. Again, I hate the way they are worded on the ballots and that they lump so many multiple projects together so you can't vote no if you really want to support one of the included projects. I wish they were required to have separate bonds for every single project. |
I am leaning no because so much of the bond will be spent on MPSA. Also voting against members who want to throw more money at option programs. Enough. |
And if option schools were abolished those would be neighborhood schools in need of repair |
What's with all of the weird anti-option school posts all of a sudden?
APE just get some new talking points? |