| Why didn’t you ask the presenter to explain the comment in more detail? |
| That’s obnoxious and I would complain |
| One woman's agenda, that's all. She may have been making the rest of the staff cringe. |
| Was this a conservative school? |
OP said it’s “woke” about everything else. Which tells you more about OP than it does about the school. |
| Divorced parent here and there’s no denying it’s rough and that it can add another layer to an already daunting college admissions process. However people will always make tone-deaf comments both inside and outside a college admissions setting. It’s irritating, but best to put it aside, be constructive and do the best you can to steer the kids through this process. |
Yes, the best thing for children is to grow up in a stable, loving two parent household. How is this new? |
This was the university representative giving the presentation and gives this presentation to presumably hundreds if not thousands of families. |
| Children of divorced parents are not a protected class. Schools can legally elect to discriminate based on this status without breaking the law. If you don’t approve, you can elect not to apply. Simple. |
No its not a conservative school by any stretch of the imagination |
Sure, happy to. Johns Hopkins |
How is it any less of a fact than name X race has lower test scores and grades than X race therefore fewer are admitted? Doesn't mean you put that content in an official university presentation telling people of that race they have less of a chance of getting in. |
| A stable household is best for kids. Modern family law does not create stable households. |
|
“I tell parents the one thing that will get their kid into college is inventing a time machine, going back in time 20 years, and making better life choices.”
Does that help, OP? |
Right? Lol. |