Yeah I’ve given up on anyone on DCUM believing that I am. It’s comically racist actually. |
the only racists left are the anti-racists and the DEI crowd. |
when did they add the B and what does it mean? i know it stands for belonging but how is that different than inclusion?
|
Pay me $$$$$$ and I’ll come give a training session to your faculty and share these deep secrets. |
I believe you, but I have lifelong friends and family who are African American (some prefer Black; I use what they prefer). I think a lot of the hardline progressive posters on DCUM don’t have any close relationships with people who aren’t white. |
lol. Being an anti-racist is not the same as being against racism. Please reread Kendi’s textbook. |
Sorry, I was a little busy.
I still believe none of you. You have one commenter saying that his law firm job forced him to read a book. Another that says the entire curriculum has been initiated with DEIB. Since other people are just saying, they don't like it because of ageism. It's clear that most of you are trolling. But it's so bothersome that it's so effective. |
Google. |
+1 Add in the boys competing in girls sports..in our public school a boy made the girls volleyball team. If they hadn’t made cuts, I would be OK with this, but alas, girls were cut for a girls’ team sport while a boy was allowed on the team. |
Inclusion usually refers to people with disabilities. Belonging is about making everyone like everyone. |
So, you aren’t interested in any opinions that aren’t lockstep identical to yours. Are you inadvertently trying to demonstrate why people have some concerns about how DEI works in practice in education? You’ve provided a good example of why people are skeptical of current DEI teachings: demands for absolute belief heterodoxy. I also don’t believe you are close to anyone or have any family who are not white. |
I have two friends who are DEI Directors. One is Mexican and one is Black, both are brilliant, and both are asking to be given another title, any other title. They are both disillusioned with the direction that DEI has been taking, believing it to be more divisive than helpful, and rooted in a lot of faulty assumptions and misguided views on history. These are two of the smartest, most thoughtful people I know. I think the gung-ho unquestioning DEI philosophy adherents are not particularly deep thinkers and are missing a lot of the nuance and downside and how it actually disadvantages some of the very same people it’s supposed to be helping. |
Wanting a change in title is different than saying we dont need DEI |
My firm has just issued a final warning to an associate. From the eye rolls and drunk comments - it does happen in 2024, in DC no less. Depending on next week his last pay check might be issued next month. |
[ ] True [X] False |