LA pitbull breeder killed while feeding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

+1
Dogs bred for violence turn to violence and they’re just going to sail them out to families, lying the whole way.

Right, because dogs bred for a certain activity can only ever do that activity. :roll:

Retrievers like to retrieve and like to hop in water. Sheep dogs like to herd. Breeds bred to be companion dogs like to sit on laps. I don’t understand why it’s only pit bull owners who insist that their one breed (“it’s akshually eight seprit breeds and akshually there’s no such thing as a pit bull you’re breed racist”) alone won’t do what it was bred to do. The reason people no longer fall for your “there are no bad dogs, only bad owners” is that pit bulls keep mauling people. Frequently helpless people.

But it is the people. The people who train these dogs to be mean and abuse them are hungry and scared. If you do that to any large breed dog you are going to get reactive scared dogs.

Because 'pit bulls' represent mixed dogs how csn you be sure it is the pit in them and not the chow or German Shepherd? You can't. Plus the media knows pit bull dogs sells so whenever one happens they will report it

You have no evidence that these pit bulls were trained to be mean, nor do you have evidence they were abused, hungry or scared. Even if they were, that doesn’t explain the hundreds of loved pit bulls who “he just snapped!”

Pit bulls were bred for violence. They can’t be rehabilitated. They can’t be saved. They’re not good pets. They’re potential killing machines and they’re ruining people’s lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

+1
Dogs bred for violence turn to violence and they’re just going to sail them out to families, lying the whole way.

Right, because dogs bred for a certain activity can only ever do that activity. :roll:

Retrievers like to retrieve and like to hop in water. Sheep dogs like to herd. Breeds bred to be companion dogs like to sit on laps. I don’t understand why it’s only pit bull owners who insist that their one breed (“it’s akshually eight seprit breeds and akshually there’s no such thing as a pit bull you’re breed racist”) alone won’t do what it was bred to do. The reason people no longer fall for your “there are no bad dogs, only bad owners” is that pit bulls keep mauling people. Frequently helpless people.

But it is the people. The people who train these dogs to be mean and abuse them are hungry and scared. If you do that to any large breed dog you are going to get reactive scared dogs.

Because 'pit bulls' represent mixed dogs how csn you be sure it is the pit in them and not the chow or German Shepherd? You can't. Plus the media knows pit bull dogs sells so whenever one happens they will report it

You have no evidence that these pit bulls were trained to be mean, nor do you have evidence they were abused, hungry or scared. Even if they were, that doesn’t explain the hundreds of loved pit bulls who “he just snapped!”

Pit bulls were bred for violence. They can’t be rehabilitated. They can’t be saved. They’re not good pets. They’re potential killing machines and they’re ruining people’s lives.

So we should kill all dogs that you deem to have potential to kill? Sort of like thought police. And speaking of this case you have zero evidence that these dogs were treated in a loving and caring environment with all their physical and emotional needs met.
And if all pit bulls were bad we would have way more attacks and deaths. But we don't so stop the lies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

+1
Dogs bred for violence turn to violence and they’re just going to sail them out to families, lying the whole way.

Right, because dogs bred for a certain activity can only ever do that activity. :roll:

Retrievers like to retrieve and like to hop in water. Sheep dogs like to herd. Breeds bred to be companion dogs like to sit on laps. I don’t understand why it’s only pit bull owners who insist that their one breed (“it’s akshually eight seprit breeds and akshually there’s no such thing as a pit bull you’re breed racist”) alone won’t do what it was bred to do. The reason people no longer fall for your “there are no bad dogs, only bad owners” is that pit bulls keep mauling people. Frequently helpless people.

But it is the people. The people who train these dogs to be mean and abuse them are hungry and scared. If you do that to any large breed dog you are going to get reactive scared dogs.

Because 'pit bulls' represent mixed dogs how csn you be sure it is the pit in them and not the chow or German Shepherd? You can't. Plus the media knows pit bull dogs sells so whenever one happens they will report it

You have no evidence that these pit bulls were trained to be mean, nor do you have evidence they were abused, hungry or scared. Even if they were, that doesn’t explain the hundreds of loved pit bulls who “he just snapped!”

Pit bulls were bred for violence. They can’t be rehabilitated. They can’t be saved. They’re not good pets. They’re potential killing machines and they’re ruining people’s lives.

So we should kill all dogs that you deem to have potential to kill? Sort of like thought police. And speaking of this case you have zero evidence that these dogs were treated in a loving and caring environment with all their physical and emotional needs met.
And if all pit bulls were bad we would have way more attacks and deaths. But we don't so stop the lies

The standard can’t possibly be that unless “-all their physical and emotional needs” are met, it’s understandable that they turn into killing machines. If that is the standard for this breed, no one should have the breed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

+1
Dogs bred for violence turn to violence and they’re just going to sail them out to families, lying the whole way.

Right, because dogs bred for a certain activity can only ever do that activity. :roll:

Retrievers like to retrieve and like to hop in water. Sheep dogs like to herd. Breeds bred to be companion dogs like to sit on laps. I don’t understand why it’s only pit bull owners who insist that their one breed (“it’s akshually eight seprit breeds and akshually there’s no such thing as a pit bull you’re breed racist”) alone won’t do what it was bred to do. The reason people no longer fall for your “there are no bad dogs, only bad owners” is that pit bulls keep mauling people. Frequently helpless people.

But it is the people. The people who train these dogs to be mean and abuse them are hungry and scared. If you do that to any large breed dog you are going to get reactive scared dogs.

Because 'pit bulls' represent mixed dogs how csn you be sure it is the pit in them and not the chow or German Shepherd? You can't. Plus the media knows pit bull dogs sells so whenever one happens they will report it

You have no evidence that these pit bulls were trained to be mean, nor do you have evidence they were abused, hungry or scared. Even if they were, that doesn’t explain the hundreds of loved pit bulls who “he just snapped!”

Pit bulls were bred for violence. They can’t be rehabilitated. They can’t be saved. They’re not good pets. They’re potential killing machines and they’re ruining people’s lives.

So we should kill all dogs that you deem to have potential to kill? Sort of like thought police. And speaking of this case you have zero evidence that these dogs were treated in a loving and caring environment with all their physical and emotional needs met.
And if all pit bulls were bad we would have way more attacks and deaths. But we don't so stop the lies

The standard can’t possibly be that unless “-all their physical and emotional needs” are met, it’s understandable that they turn into killing machines. If that is the standard for this breed, no one should have the breed.

You are bonkers to think five breeds of dogs are all killing machines and humans have no role in how they behave. My standard is very basic. Providing food, water and shelter inside your home so it is part of your family. These dogs were obviously not well taken care of!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

I actually think it is the opposite. People expect too much from their dogs. Obviously if you don't know the difference between a well fed golden who is begging and a real starving dog I don't know what I can say

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

[Anonymous]

I have nothing against pit bulls, but why would you breed them? There are so many in shelters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

+1
Dogs bred for violence turn to violence and they’re just going to sail them out to families, lying the whole way.

Right, because dogs bred for a certain activity can only ever do that activity. :roll:

Retrievers like to retrieve and like to hop in water. Sheep dogs like to herd. Breeds bred to be companion dogs like to sit on laps. I don’t understand why it’s only pit bull owners who insist that their one breed (“it’s akshually eight seprit breeds and akshually there’s no such thing as a pit bull you’re breed racist”) alone won’t do what it was bred to do. The reason people no longer fall for your “there are no bad dogs, only bad owners” is that pit bulls keep mauling people. Frequently helpless people.

But it is the people. The people who train these dogs to be mean and abuse them are hungry and scared. If you do that to any large breed dog you are going to get reactive scared dogs.

Because 'pit bulls' represent mixed dogs how csn you be sure it is the pit in them and not the chow or German Shepherd? You can't. Plus the media knows pit bull dogs sells so whenever one happens they will report it

You have no evidence that these pit bulls were trained to be mean, nor do you have evidence they were abused, hungry or scared. Even if they were, that doesn’t explain the hundreds of loved pit bulls who “he just snapped!”

Pit bulls were bred for violence. They can’t be rehabilitated. They can’t be saved. They’re not good pets. They’re potential killing machines and they’re ruining people’s lives.

So we should kill all dogs that you deem to have potential to kill? Sort of like thought police. And speaking of this case you have zero evidence that these dogs were treated in a loving and caring environment with all their physical and emotional needs met.
And if all pit bulls were bad we would have way more attacks and deaths. But we don't so stop the lies

The standard can’t possibly be that unless “-all their physical and emotional needs” are met, it’s understandable that they turn into killing machines. If that is the standard for this breed, no one should have the breed.

You are bonkers to think five breeds of dogs are all killing machines and humans have no role in how they behave. My standard is very basic. Providing food, water and shelter inside your home so it is part of your family. These dogs were obviously not well taken care of!

This was a breeder. Shelters are chock full of pits and pit mixes. If so many are ending up in shelters, what percentage of them are taken care of better than this breeder was taking care of hers? Most are not, or they wouldn’t end up in shelters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have nothing against pit bulls, but why would you breed them? There are so many in shelters.

Well, they were breeding them for something. Probably not to be pets.

[Anonymous]

We really need some way to make sure fewer pit bulls breed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We really need some way to make sure fewer pit bulls breed.

They're being bred like crazy. Lowest spay and neuter rates of any breed.