LA pitbull breeder killed while feeding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

Perhaps they keep them to weak to attack. They also debark the poor animals so nio one can hear them

They have to sell some of them, they can't all be weak

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

The point is that doodles who are poorly bred are neurotic and unhealthy, not maulers. Pit bulls are bred for violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

This is not true. Many Amish view the dogs as livestock and keep hundred of dogs in cages. They debark ( remove their voice boxes) them so people can not hear them. They live in cages and aren't given and love and affection. This is cruel and it is abusive. Breeding females over and over until they can't and then shooting them dead. Sure the dogs teach them to fight but only because they want to sell designer dogs.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=7187712&page=1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

The point is that doodles who are poorly bred are neurotic and unhealthy, not maulers. Pit bulls are bred for violence.

so pp you don't care about the lives of puppy mill dogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

LOL at this bucolic description. Our rescue is regularly contacted when the Amish farmer plans to shoot dogs that have outlived their usefulness.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

We adopted a male Lab who had previously been a breeder dog at an Amish breeder in PA. He was extremely defensive of me whenever any man came into the room. He would bare his teeth and lunge at them. Not normal behavior for a Lab. He had clearly been mistreated by a man and he had only lived on that one Amish farm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

LOL at this bucolic description. Our rescue is regularly contacted when the Amish farmer plans to shoot dogs that have outlived their usefulness.

?

How would you even know? They hopping in the buggy to go to the store where they use the phone and call you up? I find this hard to believe and am beginning to realize that shelters and rescues are part of the machine that keeps Amish breeders - and pit bull backyard breeders - in business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

LOL at this bucolic description. Our rescue is regularly contacted when the Amish farmer plans to shoot dogs that have outlived their usefulness.

?

How would you even know? They hopping in the buggy to go to the store where they use the phone and call you up? I find this hard to believe and am beginning to realize that shelters and rescues are part of the machine that keeps Amish breeders - and pit bull backyard breeders - in business.

Found the puppy mill owner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And re the starving, aren't other dogs also sometimes hungry? None of these stories involve dogs that weren't being fed. Presumably if you walk your dog you're feeding it

My golden retriever is hungry 100% of the time. The chance that he would eat any human is 0%. He won’t even eat out of the open food bin until we tell him okay. He just flips down on his bed and looks sad. Everyone I read these comments that say “any dog can attack” I think people are getting entirely the wrong dogs. You could kick my dog in the head and he still wouldn’t attack. The rescue trend in which everyone is getting dogs and expects them to have some issue that needs fixing has just totally reset our cultural expectations for dogs. I expect my dogs to be man’s best friend. I’ve had several dogs and the worst thing any of them ever did was chew my shoes or steal a dirty paper towel.

So what is the difference? Why are golden retrievers not in the news for eating or attacking when hungry?

Pit bulls are seem as "tough" guy dogs and attract unsavory characters who abuse and breed them. Goldens are expensive do not have the same image.

Most Pitbull owners are genuinely nice people who believe that they can be rehabilitated.

And most are nice dogs!

And yet, dogs in Amish puppy mills never do this.

The problem with Amish puppy mills is that they breed animals indiscriminately and frequently. They’re breeding for quantity and not quality — but apart from breeding females more often than they should, they don’t mistreat the animals. They’re not starving them or having them fight each other. The Amish have large families and the kids all do chores. They’re keeping the animals fed and clean.

This is not true. Many Amish view the dogs as livestock and keep hundred of dogs in cages. They debark ( remove their voice boxes) them so people can not hear them. They live in cages and aren't given and love and affection. This is cruel and it is abusive. Breeding females over and over until they can't and then shooting them dead. Sure the dogs teach them to fight but only because they want to sell designer dogs.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=7187712&page=1

You’re right. I know an Amish family that takes good care of their animals, but I shouldn’t have used them to make a broad generalization. I was wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

What? No!!! That is INSANE. They should euthanize all of them. And then they'll act surprised when one of the rehomed animals attacks another person.

Where did you read that?
I would euthanize all adult dogs, puppies - only of they were part of the attack

I just read that the dogs did NOT maul the man. He was bitten when he tried to intervene betwen two fighting dogs and one bit him in an artery. They killed all the dogs, including the puppies and other dogs who didn't do anything

Very shameful

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

What? No!!! That is INSANE. They should euthanize all of them. And then they'll act surprised when one of the rehomed animals attacks another person.

Where did you read that?
I would euthanize all adult dogs, puppies - only of they were part of the attack

I just read that the dogs did NOT maul the man. He was bitten when he tried to intervene betwen two fighting dogs and one bit him in an artery. They killed all the dogs, including the puppies and other dogs who didn't do anything

Very shameful

Once the owner died who was going to take care of them anyways? They would have just ended up in a shelter to be euthanized later.

[Anonymous]

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

They didnt maul him. He was breaking up a fight and they bit him in a bad location. Who know if the dogs wete resource guarding. Since they didnt keep attacking I think it was accidental.

I don't understand why you would put any of those dogs down. There s rescue groups. Especially for the puppies!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

What? No!!! That is INSANE. They should euthanize all of them. And then they'll act surprised when one of the rehomed animals attacks another person.

Where did you read that?
I would euthanize all adult dogs, puppies - only of they were part of the attack

I just read that the dogs did NOT maul the man. He was bitten when he tried to intervene betwen two fighting dogs and one bit him in an artery. They killed all the dogs, including the puppies and other dogs who didn't do anything

Very shameful

Once the owner died who was going to take care of them anyways? They would have just ended up in a shelter to be euthanized later.

There are rescue groups!