LA pitbull breeder killed while feeding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. It annoys me that they’re dna testing the dogs though and only plan to euthanize the ones who actually attacked the man. If they were normal dogs that would be fine but for pit bulls they should all be euthanized.

What? No!!! That is INSANE. They should euthanize all of them. And then they'll act surprised when one of the rehomed animals attacks another person.

Where did you read that?
I would euthanize all adult dogs, puppies - only of they were part of the attack

I just read that the dogs did NOT maul the man. He was bitten when he tried to intervene betwen two fighting dogs and one bit him in an artery. They killed all the dogs, including the puppies and other dogs who didn't do anything

Very shameful

Once the owner died who was going to take care of them anyways? They would have just ended up in a shelter to be euthanized later.

There are rescue groups!

Is there some dearth of pitbulls currently in rescue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

They didnt maul him. They did mail him. He was breaking up a fight and they bit him in a bad location. I guess multiple horrific injuries on the upper and lower halves of his body is “a bad location.” Who know if the dogs wete resource guarding. They weren’t resource guarding, they were pit bulls and as such come from a long line of dogs bred to kill. Since they didnt keep attacking I think it was accidental. Since they achieved their objective, they didn’t need to keep going. They killed him.

I don't understand why you would put any of those dogs down. Because they killed a guy. There s rescue groups. Who wants to rescue annd “rehabilitate” man eaters?! Especially for the puppies! Who are already have a fatal human attack on their history? I’m comfortable with them having been put down[b].

We can end the societal fiction that pit bulls are “misunderstood” or only “scary looking.” They’re dogs with a unique capacity for violence, and humans bred that into them. Let’s stop wasting resources on these terrible creatures and go back to a time when shelters had regular happy mutts instead of dogs that “resource guard” by murdering.

[Anonymous]

https://www.foxla.com/news/compton-pitbull-breeder-mauled-remembered-friend

This is the article where it said he wasn't mauled. Also, the guy was feeding 13 dogs at once with no separation. Since he obviously had unfixed male dogs this was not a good idea and he paid with his life. He is one of the breeders who is not in it for the love of the dogs but, only wanted money so I doubt they were well taken care of.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

They didnt maul him. They did mail him. He was breaking up a fight and they bit him in a bad location. I guess multiple horrific injuries on the upper and lower halves of his body is “a bad location.” Who know if the dogs wete resource guarding. They weren’t resource guarding, they were pit bulls and as such come from a long line of dogs bred to kill. Since they didnt keep attacking I think it was accidental. Since they achieved their objective, they didn’t need to keep going. They killed him.

I don't understand why you would put any of those dogs down. Because they killed a guy. There s rescue groups. Who wants to rescue annd “rehabilitate” man eaters?! Especially for the puppies! Who are already have a fatal human attack on their history? I’m comfortable with them having been put down[b].

We can end the societal fiction that pit bulls are “misunderstood” or only “scary looking.” They’re dogs with a unique capacity for violence, and humans bred that into them. Let’s stop wasting resources on these terrible creatures and go back to a time when shelters had regular happy mutts instead of dogs that “resource guard” by murdering.

Tell us your experience working with dogs or is this information you gleemed off the internet? Dogs do resource guard and especially intact males. Not every dog killed him. Just because you don't want to rehabitate them doesn't mean that there aren't people who do.

What fantasy are you living in that all the shelter dogs were "happy?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

They didnt maul him. They did mail him. He was breaking up a fight and they bit him in a bad location. I guess multiple horrific injuries on the upper and lower halves of his body is “a bad location.” Who know if the dogs wete resource guarding. They weren’t resource guarding, they were pit bulls and as such come from a long line of dogs bred to kill. Since they didnt keep attacking I think it was accidental. Since they achieved their objective, they didn’t need to keep going. They killed him.

I don't understand why you would put any of those dogs down. Because they killed a guy. There s rescue groups. Who wants to rescue annd “rehabilitate” man eaters?! Especially for the puppies! Who are already have a fatal human attack on their history? I’m comfortable with them having been put down[b].

We can end the societal fiction that pit bulls are “misunderstood” or only “scary looking.” They’re dogs with a unique capacity for violence, and humans bred that into them. Let’s stop wasting resources on these terrible creatures and go back to a time when shelters had regular happy mutts instead of dogs that “resource guard” by murdering.

Tell us your experience working with dogs or is this information you gleemed off the internet? Dogs do resource guard and especially intact males. Not every dog killed him. Just because you don't want to rehabitate them doesn't mean that there aren't people who do.

What fantasy are you living in that all the shelter dogs were "happy?"

Forgot to add, dogs don't murder. That is on humans. Dogs can kill but are they morally responsible? I say no. It is the human's responsiblity and he had too many dogs who should have been separated.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/all-dogs-go-heaven/201507/dogs-and-the-death-penalty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

They didnt maul him. They did mail him. He was breaking up a fight and they bit him in a bad location. I guess multiple horrific injuries on the upper and lower halves of his body is “a bad location.” Who know if the dogs wete resource guarding. They weren’t resource guarding, they were pit bulls and as such come from a long line of dogs bred to kill. Since they didnt keep attacking I think it was accidental. Since they achieved their objective, they didn’t need to keep going. They killed him.

I don't understand why you would put any of those dogs down. Because they killed a guy. There s rescue groups. Who wants to rescue annd “rehabilitate” man eaters?! Especially for the puppies! Who are already have a fatal human attack on their history? I’m comfortable with them having been put down[b].

We can end the societal fiction that pit bulls are “misunderstood” or only “scary looking.” They’re dogs with a unique capacity for violence, and humans bred that into them. Let’s stop wasting resources on these terrible creatures and go back to a time when shelters had regular happy mutts instead of dogs that “resource guard” by murdering.

Tell us your experience working with dogs or is this information you gleemed off the internet? Dogs do resource guard and especially intact males. Not every dog killed him. Just because you don't want to rehabitate them doesn't mean that there aren't people who do.

What fantasy are you living in that all the shelter dogs were "happy?"

I’ll rephrase. What you and the other reflexive pit bull supporters call “resource guarding” is just flat out aggression. What you call “reactive” is just flat out aggression. What you think can be “rehabilitated” cannot be. Once the switch is flipped, the behavior to which the animal is predisposed is going to be present and it isn’t fair that the rest of us are pawns in your dangerous little game. This specific guy owned these dogs, but most of the people and the cats and dogs and livestock who are mauled to death by these animals don’t even know them as they leap over fences and burst through doors. Go get a normal dog with normal responses and let us let the pit bulls breeds fade slowly into history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

All the dogs will probably be put down since they don't know, well aside from bloody mouths which dogs attacked him and each other.

They didnt maul him. They did mail him. He was breaking up a fight and they bit him in a bad location. I guess multiple horrific injuries on the upper and lower halves of his body is “a bad location.” Who know if the dogs wete resource guarding. They weren’t resource guarding, they were pit bulls and as such come from a long line of dogs bred to kill. Since they didnt keep attacking I think it was accidental. Since they achieved their objective, they didn’t need to keep going. They killed him.

I don't understand why you would put any of those dogs down. Because they killed a guy. There s rescue groups. Who wants to rescue annd “rehabilitate” man eaters?! Especially for the puppies! Who are already have a fatal human attack on their history? I’m comfortable with them having been put down[b].

We can end the societal fiction that pit bulls are “misunderstood” or only “scary looking.” They’re dogs with a unique capacity for violence, and humans bred that into them. Let’s stop wasting resources on these terrible creatures and go back to a time when shelters had regular happy mutts instead of dogs that “resource guard” by murdering.

Tell us your experience working with dogs or is this information you gleemed off the internet? Dogs do resource guard and especially intact males. Not every dog killed him. Just because you don't want to rehabitate them doesn't mean that there aren't people who do.

What fantasy are you living in that all the shelter dogs were "happy?"

I’ll rephrase. What you and the other reflexive pit bull supporters call “resource guarding” is just flat out aggression. What you call “reactive” is just flat out aggression. What you think can be “rehabilitated” cannot be. Once the switch is flipped, the behavior to which the animal is predisposed is going to be present and it isn’t fair that the rest of us are pawns in your dangerous little game. This specific guy owned these dogs, but most of the people and the cats and dogs and livestock who are mauled to death by these animals don’t even know them as they leap over fences and burst through doors. Go get a normal dog with normal responses and let us let the pit bulls breeds fade slowly into history.

Wrong about reactive. Reactive is fear based and the dog learns that to get the scary thing away it barks and lunges. You definitely can improve the reactivity with medication and counter-conditioning training. With positive reinforcement progress can be made.

In this case, these dogs were fearful that they weren't going to get enough food. This happens to humans as well when we are in dire conditions.

If you think that life will be perfect if there are no pit bulls or mixes than you are living in a fantasy world. Humans kill more than dogs and yet we aren't banned. We also kill more pit bulls than they kill us. So who should really be scared? Us or the pit bulls?