Paris Hilton - Baby Boy

[Anonymous]

Y'all are talking like you actually think this guy is anything more than a sperm donor. Come on folks, she's got a prenup, his offspring and a nanny. He doesn't matter at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how she kept saying in media what a great dad her husband would be. He was already a dad. A terrible dad who didn’t acknowledge or see his kid.

Wow really?! I hadn’t read about this.

He has a daughter from a previous relationship with a reality-show actress. He is not a part of the kid’s life and she was not invited to the wedding.

Ugh this is so gross.

“The people who this story matters to have known about it for 10 years. Carter supports this child. While he does not have a traditional father-daughter relationship with her, he has provided for her since she was born, and will continue to do so,” said a spokesperson for Reum.”
https://pagesix.com/2021/11/15/revealed-paris-hiltons-husband-carter-reum-has-a-lovechild/

He clearly has the finances to ensure he had rights to see his child. That he doesn’t is sad. Seems like he didn’t want this child.

Even if he didn’t want her she exists now. It’s messed up and I have no respect for him.

Is a shitty involved father better than no father involved?

Wait what? A father who bows out is a shitty father.

You can’t make someone be a parent. I was responding to PP’s comment about the daughter existing whether he wanted her or not. So my question is the guy clearly didn’t want the kid. If he was forced to be in her life is it better to have a father involved that’s shitty to your face because he didn’t want you. Or is it better if this person is never in your life?

It’s better if he’s not a POS and cares for his child. He should have gotten a therapist, sorted out his regret over not wearing a condom, and then raised his kid in a loving way. There’s no such thing as “forcing” a parent to be in the child’s life so I have no idea where you’re even going with that. But I have absolutely no respect for him.

Women need to understand that men having sex with them does not mean that they want to father a child. Women need to be in BC and insist that the man should wear a condom. Otherwise? Bye bye baby!

So I guess you don’t like the idea of child support.

NP. Personally, I think men need to be held accountable for every penny of child support, but you can't expect them to be fathers in anything other than finances if they don't want to be. As long as he made his intentions clear to not be a parent but to keep cutting the checks til 18, he's fine. If that was not ok with her, she could choose to not have the child.

And if it's not ok with the child? She should just accept that he doesn't want to be her father in "anything other than finances"? I get that legally that is acceptable, but morally it is not, at least to me

She can take it up with her mom because her mom was the one who chose to bring her into this world in less than ideal circumstances. Her mom decided it didn't matter to her to give her a father in anything other than finances.

Oh, ok. She should blame her mom for not aborting her. Got it. Not her father who is actively choosing not to be in her life.

As long as he dutifully pays his child support and made it crystal clear early on that he was not going to be a parent (maybe even signing away his parental rights) then yes.

Only way to make it crystal clear is to use a condom

And she could have insisted on one or gotten an IUD. We don't know what went down with birth control. But as an adamantly pro-choice woman, it's ultimately the woman's job to determine if she wants to carry a pregnancy. If you decide to do that with an unwilling partner, that's totally fine, tons of women become single mothers. But beyond child support, you cannot compel a man to be a father. You just can't. So you live with your choices.

I've known several women to carry IUD pregnancies full term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how she kept saying in media what a great dad her husband would be. He was already a dad. A terrible dad who didn’t acknowledge or see his kid.

Wow really?! I hadn’t read about this.

He has a daughter from a previous relationship with a reality-show actress. He is not a part of the kid’s life and she was not invited to the wedding.

Ugh this is so gross.

“The people who this story matters to have known about it for 10 years. Carter supports this child. While he does not have a traditional father-daughter relationship with her, he has provided for her since she was born, and will continue to do so,” said a spokesperson for Reum.”
https://pagesix.com/2021/11/15/revealed-paris-hiltons-husband-carter-reum-has-a-lovechild/

He clearly has the finances to ensure he had rights to see his child. That he doesn’t is sad. Seems like he didn’t want this child.

Even if he didn’t want her she exists now. It’s messed up and I have no respect for him.

How many with an IUD, on the pill, who insist on condoms?
Is a shitty involved father better than no father involved?

Wait what? A father who bows out is a shitty father.

You can’t make someone be a parent. I was responding to PP’s comment about the daughter existing whether he wanted her or not. So my question is the guy clearly didn’t want the kid. If he was forced to be in her life is it better to have a father involved that’s shitty to your face because he didn’t want you. Or is it better if this person is never in your life?

It’s better if he’s not a POS and cares for his child. He should have gotten a therapist, sorted out his regret over not wearing a condom, and then raised his kid in a loving way. There’s no such thing as “forcing” a parent to be in the child’s life so I have no idea where you’re even going with that. But I have absolutely no respect for him.

Women need to understand that men having sex with them does not mean that they want to father a child. Women need to be in BC and insist that the man should wear a condom. Otherwise? Bye bye baby!

So I guess you don’t like the idea of child support.

NP. Personally, I think men need to be held accountable for every penny of child support, but you can't expect them to be fathers in anything other than finances if they don't want to be. As long as he made his intentions clear to not be a parent but to keep cutting the checks til 18, he's fine. If that was not ok with her, she could choose to not have the child.

And if it's not ok with the child? She should just accept that he doesn't want to be her father in "anything other than finances"? I get that legally that is acceptable, but morally it is not, at least to me

She can take it up with her mom because her mom was the one who chose to bring her into this world in less than ideal circumstances. Her mom decided it didn't matter to her to give her a father in anything other than finances.

Oh, ok. She should blame her mom for not aborting her. Got it. Not her father who is actively choosing not to be in her life.

As long as he dutifully pays his child support and made it crystal clear early on that he was not going to be a parent (maybe even signing away his parental rights) then yes.

Only way to make it crystal clear is to use a condom

And she could have insisted on one or gotten an IUD. We don't know what went down with birth control. But as an adamantly pro-choice woman, it's ultimately the woman's job to determine if she wants to carry a pregnancy. If you decide to do that with an unwilling partner, that's totally fine, tons of women become single mothers. But beyond child support, you cannot compel a man to be a father. You just can't. So you live with your choices.

I've known several women to carry IUD pregnancies full term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Y'all are talking like you actually think this guy is anything more than a sperm donor. Come on folks, she's got a prenup, his offspring and a nanny. He doesn't matter at all.

If he doesn’t matter at all why bother marrying and having a baby with him? She has plenty of money and could have picked a sperm donor and done the whole thing on her own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Y'all are talking like you actually think this guy is anything more than a sperm donor. Come on folks, she's got a prenup, his offspring and a nanny. He doesn't matter at all.

If he doesn’t matter at all why bother marrying and having a baby with him? She has plenty of money and could have picked a sperm donor and done the whole thing on her own.

Because she's Paris Hilton. Dream wedding, styling, big party.

Literally she has all the power. This guy is nothing, just a pawn in the media game like the Kardashians. None of it is real.

[Anonymous]

Eh, hopefully it will work out for them. Even if it doesn't, hopefully she'll try to be a good mother.

[Anonymous]

I think the fact that Paris is saying he’ll be a great father as if hasn’t had a child is really cruel to his biologically daughter. I get that he chose not to have a relationship with her but to have it plastered all over the media that he has been planning and excited to have kids for a few years with Paris? That’s really mean to have to read as his daughter. He is causing her even more pain than he has already. It’s narcissistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think the fact that Paris is saying he’ll be a great father as if hasn’t had a child is really cruel to his biologically daughter. I get that he chose not to have a relationship with her but to have it plastered all over the media that he has been planning and excited to have kids for a few years with Paris? That’s really mean to have to read as his daughter. He is causing her even more pain than he has already. It’s narcissistic.

He's not a great father to his first child. So he WILL be a great one to this new baby. Naive maybe but factually correct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the fact that Paris is saying he’ll be a great father as if hasn’t had a child is really cruel to his biologically daughter. I get that he chose not to have a relationship with her but to have it plastered all over the media that he has been planning and excited to have kids for a few years with Paris? That’s really mean to have to read as his daughter. He is causing her even more pain than he has already. It’s narcissistic.

He's not a great father to his first child. So he WILL be a great one to this new baby. Naive maybe but factually correct

No that’s incoherent. I’ll change the roles to explain why. Larla currently works as a nurse. Her hospital has tracked many mistakes and are about to fire her. She gets hired in a new job at a new hospital and her future supervisor says “she’s going to be a great nurse!” They are wrong. She’s already a nurse and she is bad at it.

[Anonymous]

What is the child’s name?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how she kept saying in media what a great dad her husband would be. He was already a dad. A terrible dad who didn’t acknowledge or see his kid.

Wow really?! I hadn’t read about this.

He has a daughter from a previous relationship with a reality-show actress. He is not a part of the kid’s life and she was not invited to the wedding.

Ugh this is so gross.

“The people who this story matters to have known about it for 10 years. Carter supports this child. While he does not have a traditional father-daughter relationship with her, he has provided for her since she was born, and will continue to do so,” said a spokesperson for Reum.”
https://pagesix.com/2021/11/15/revealed-paris-hiltons-husband-carter-reum-has-a-lovechild/

He clearly has the finances to ensure he had rights to see his child. That he doesn’t is sad. Seems like he didn’t want this child.

Even if he didn’t want her she exists now. It’s messed up and I have no respect for him.

Is a shitty involved father better than no father involved?

Wait what? A father who bows out is a shitty father.

You can’t make someone be a parent. I was responding to PP’s comment about the daughter existing whether he wanted her or not. So my question is the guy clearly didn’t want the kid. If he was forced to be in her life is it better to have a father involved that’s shitty to your face because he didn’t want you. Or is it better if this person is never in your life?

It’s better if he’s not a POS and cares for his child. He should have gotten a therapist, sorted out his regret over not wearing a condom, and then raised his kid in a loving way. There’s no such thing as “forcing” a parent to be in the child’s life so I have no idea where you’re even going with that. But I have absolutely no respect for him.

Women need to understand that men having sex with them does not mean that they want to father a child. Women need to be in BC and insist that the man should wear a condom. Otherwise? Bye bye baby!

So I guess you don’t like the idea of child support.

NP. Personally, I think men need to be held accountable for every penny of child support, but you can't expect them to be fathers in anything other than finances if they don't want to be. As long as he made his intentions clear to not be a parent but to keep cutting the checks til 18, he's fine. If that was not ok with her, she could choose to not have the child.

+1

+2. Don't feel sorry for his oldest daughter. She doesn't know life with her biological father. It probably isn't a big loss. She's old enough to realize he isn't the greatest and that she isn't missing anything by having him in her life. She may have other father figures she enjoys more.

There are many different types of families out there. Fatherless ones included. It just is what it is. This girl may not be pining away from the father she never had.

Just keep the money rolling in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think the fact that Paris is saying he’ll be a great father as if hasn’t had a child is really cruel to his biologically daughter. I get that he chose not to have a relationship with her but to have it plastered all over the media that he has been planning and excited to have kids for a few years with Paris? That’s really mean to have to read as his daughter. He is causing her even more pain than he has already. It’s narcissistic.

He's not a great father to his first child. So he WILL be a great one to this new baby. Naive maybe but factually correct

No that’s incoherent. I’ll change the roles to explain why. Larla currently works as a nurse. Her hospital has tracked many mistakes and are about to fire her. She gets hired in a new job at a new hospital and her future supervisor says “she’s going to be a great nurse!” They are wrong. She’s already a nurse and she is bad at it.

He's going to be a better father didn't have the same ring to it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how she kept saying in media what a great dad her husband would be. He was already a dad. A terrible dad who didn’t acknowledge or see his kid.

Wow really?! I hadn’t read about this.

He has a daughter from a previous relationship with a reality-show actress. He is not a part of the kid’s life and she was not invited to the wedding.

Ugh this is so gross.

“The people who this story matters to have known about it for 10 years. Carter supports this child. While he does not have a traditional father-daughter relationship with her, he has provided for her since she was born, and will continue to do so,” said a spokesperson for Reum.”
https://pagesix.com/2021/11/15/revealed-paris-hiltons-husband-carter-reum-has-a-lovechild/

He clearly has the finances to ensure he had rights to see his child. That he doesn’t is sad. Seems like he didn’t want this child.

Even if he didn’t want her she exists now. It’s messed up and I have no respect for him.

Is a shitty involved father better than no father involved?

Wait what? A father who bows out is a shitty father.

You can’t make someone be a parent. I was responding to PP’s comment about the daughter existing whether he wanted her or not. So my question is the guy clearly didn’t want the kid. If he was forced to be in her life is it better to have a father involved that’s shitty to your face because he didn’t want you. Or is it better if this person is never in your life?

It’s better if he’s not a POS and cares for his child. He should have gotten a therapist, sorted out his regret over not wearing a condom, and then raised his kid in a loving way. There’s no such thing as “forcing” a parent to be in the child’s life so I have no idea where you’re even going with that. But I have absolutely no respect for him.

Women need to understand that men having sex with them does not mean that they want to father a child. Women need to be in BC and insist that the man should wear a condom. Otherwise? Bye bye baby!

So I guess you don’t like the idea of child support.

NP. Personally, I think men need to be held accountable for every penny of child support, but you can't expect them to be fathers in anything other than finances if they don't want to be. As long as he made his intentions clear to not be a parent but to keep cutting the checks til 18, he's fine. If that was not ok with her, she could choose to not have the child.

+1

+2. Don't feel sorry for his oldest daughter. She doesn't know life with her biological father. It probably isn't a big loss. She's old enough to realize he isn't the greatest and that she isn't missing anything by having him in her life. She may have other father figures she enjoys more.

There are many different types of families out there. Fatherless ones included. It just is what it is. This girl may not be pining away from the father she never had.

Just keep the money rolling in.

Hmm I can't tell if you're with a guy who acts like this or a woman raising a child in the same situation trying to reason that your kid is ok. It would take a saint to not be at least a little upset that you're bio dad is gushing about becoming a dad as if he isn't one already. He just picks and chooses when it counts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Congrats to them! Paris has been talking about wanting to be a mom since her early 20s, she must be over the moon.

She has? Never heard of that and her behavior and lifestyle certainly never showed that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how she kept saying in media what a great dad her husband would be. He was already a dad. A terrible dad who didn’t acknowledge or see his kid.

Wow really?! I hadn’t read about this.

He has a daughter from a previous relationship with a reality-show actress. He is not a part of the kid’s life and she was not invited to the wedding.

Ugh this is so gross.

“The people who this story matters to have known about it for 10 years. Carter supports this child. While he does not have a traditional father-daughter relationship with her, he has provided for her since she was born, and will continue to do so,” said a spokesperson for Reum.”
https://pagesix.com/2021/11/15/revealed-paris-hiltons-husband-carter-reum-has-a-lovechild/

He clearly has the finances to ensure he had rights to see his child. That he doesn’t is sad. Seems like he didn’t want this child.

Even if he didn’t want her she exists now. It’s messed up and I have no respect for him.

Is a shitty involved father better than no father involved?

Wait what? A father who bows out is a shitty father.

You can’t make someone be a parent. I was responding to PP’s comment about the daughter existing whether he wanted her or not. So my question is the guy clearly didn’t want the kid. If he was forced to be in her life is it better to have a father involved that’s shitty to your face because he didn’t want you. Or is it better if this person is never in your life?

It’s better if he’s not a POS and cares for his child. He should have gotten a therapist, sorted out his regret over not wearing a condom, and then raised his kid in a loving way. There’s no such thing as “forcing” a parent to be in the child’s life so I have no idea where you’re even going with that. But I have absolutely no respect for him.

Women need to understand that men having sex with them does not mean that they want to father a child. Women need to be in BC and insist that the man should wear a condom. Otherwise? Bye bye baby!

So I guess you don’t like the idea of child support.

NP. Personally, I think men need to be held accountable for every penny of child support, but you can't expect them to be fathers in anything other than finances if they don't want to be. As long as he made his intentions clear to not be a parent but to keep cutting the checks til 18, he's fine. If that was not ok with her, she could choose to not have the child.

+1

+2. Don't feel sorry for his oldest daughter. She doesn't know life with her biological father. It probably isn't a big loss. She's old enough to realize he isn't the greatest and that she isn't missing anything by having him in her life. She may have other father figures she enjoys more.

There are many different types of families out there. Fatherless ones included. It just is what it is. This girl may not be pining away from the father she never had.

Just keep the money rolling in.

Except that isn’t true based on the Page Six article. Supposedly this child is upset that her father isn’t in her life.