VA Get Ready For Abortion Ban

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do'nt understand what I'm reading, honestly.

What do you not understand?
Youngkin ran on banning all contraceptives, all abortions, IVF, any women's medical issues. Not one exception for age, rape or incest. So a 10 year old gets pregnant in VA she gets to carry.

The only reason he has not been able to pass anything is L Louise Lucas

There is a chance this will pass.

Virginia voters are idiots. FACT.

From a full abortion ban to privatizing schools welcome to the handmaid's tale and the new Alabama or Missouri.

Anyone sending a college student to any school in VA stupid. Women are going to die in droves.

Youngkin didn't run on those things. During the election people were on here saying he was being secretive about his real plans, telling a pro-lifer that he would do things after he was elected.

Oh please, you had to be a fool to think he was not running on these items.

Everyone with a brain knew he was a liar.

So you agree he wasn't running on those things explicitly. You have to call him a liar to attribute these positions to him.

Depends on what you mean by "explicitly", doesn't it? Did he say, in so many words, that he supported those positions? No. Did he make it clear that he did support them? Yes.

[Anonymous]

Anyone else just happy that this is the end of Youngkin? Either he comes out in support of a ban and becomes unelectable with his moderate appeal or he doesn't and he becomes unelectable after alienating his base.

[Anonymous]

this will never pass. it would be bad for VA reputation as a business friendly state. As long as Bezos opposed a ban, VA would not be so stupid to ban. Plus, oither states have tried this and its not holding up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else just happy that this is the end of Youngkin? Either he comes out in support of a ban and becomes unelectable with his moderate appeal or he doesn't and he becomes unelectable after alienating his base.

It would be interesting to see what happens if his hand is forced. Will the independents/"crt" parents stick with him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He didn’t call out Trump for January 6th and still hasn’t and that tells me all that I need to know about him. He’s garbage.

+1

He's a Trumphumper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else just happy that this is the end of Youngkin? Either he comes out in support of a ban and becomes unelectable with his moderate appeal or he doesn't and he becomes unelectable after alienating his base.

It would be interesting to see what happens if his hand is forced. Will the independents/"crt" parents stick with him?

Nope, the VA GOP will lose state-wide for another decade just like last time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do'nt understand what I'm reading, honestly.

What do you not understand?
Youngkin ran on banning all contraceptives, all abortions, IVF, any women's medical issues. Not one exception for age, rape or incest. So a 10 year old gets pregnant in VA she gets to carry.

The only reason he has not been able to pass anything is L Louise Lucas

There is a chance this will pass.

Virginia voters are idiots. FACT.

From a full abortion ban to privatizing schools welcome to the handmaid's tale and the new Alabama or Missouri.

Anyone sending a college student to any school in VA stupid. Women are going to die in droves.

Youngkin didn't run on those things. During the election people were on here saying he was being secretive about his real plans, telling a pro-lifer that he would do things after he was elected.

Oh please, you had to be a fool to think he was not running on these items.

Everyone with a brain knew he was a liar.

So you agree he wasn't running on those things explicitly. You have to call him a liar to attribute these positions to him.

Depends on what you mean by "explicitly", doesn't it? Did he say, in so many words, that he supported those positions? No. Did he make it clear that he did support them? Yes.

You confirmed the point. Not only was he not running on those things, he didn't even express support according to you. That is more than what Mitt Romney did in Massachusetts, who expressed support but said he wouldn't push any of these things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this will never pass. it would be bad for VA reputation as a business friendly state. As long as Bezos opposed a ban, VA would not be so stupid to ban. Plus, oither states have tried this and its not holding up

Government policy should be dictated by corporations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do'nt understand what I'm reading, honestly.

What do you not understand?
Youngkin ran on banning all contraceptives, all abortions, IVF, any women's medical issues. Not one exception for age, rape or incest. So a 10 year old gets pregnant in VA she gets to carry.

The only reason he has not been able to pass anything is L Louise Lucas

There is a chance this will pass.

Virginia voters are idiots. FACT.

From a full abortion ban to privatizing schools welcome to the handmaid's tale and the new Alabama or Missouri.

Anyone sending a college student to any school in VA stupid. Women are going to die in droves.

Youngkin didn't run on those things. During the election people were on here saying he was being secretive about his real plans, telling a pro-lifer that he would do things after he was elected.

Oh please, you had to be a fool to think he was not running on these items.

Everyone with a brain knew he was a liar.

So you agree he wasn't running on those things explicitly. You have to call him a liar to attribute these positions to him.

Depends on what you mean by "explicitly", doesn't it? Did he say, in so many words, that he supported those positions? No. Did he make it clear that he did support them? Yes.

You confirmed the point. Not only was he not running on those things, he didn't even express support according to you. That is more than what Mitt Romney did in Massachusetts, who expressed support but said he wouldn't push any of these things.

He could have done that, but he didn’t. Because he DOES want to push those things.

He said he’d “go on the offense” against women’s rights after the election. He couldn’t talk about it before the election or he’d lose the Independent vote. Words right out of his mouth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:this will never pass. it would be bad for VA reputation as a business friendly state. As long as Bezos opposed a ban, VA would not be so stupid to ban. Plus, oither states have tried this and its not holding up

? You think companies in TX are fleeing over their abortion ban? Actually, lots of young people moving to TX.

https://cw33.com/news/texas/study-millennials-are-moving-to-these-texas-cities-more-than-most-in-us/

I know NoVa thinks it's immune to state politics, but it isn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait. Does VA have a ban on same-sex marriage?

No, of course not. The nutters on this thread would love for you to believe otherwise, though.

Actually it does have one on the books but it’s superseded by the marriage equality act.

and that federal act also includes interracial relationships. Can you imagine if Congress didn't have this act, and SCOTUS pushed marriages back to the states just like abortion rights? All those gay couples and interracial couples in VA would be breaking VA state law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this will never pass. it would be bad for VA reputation as a business friendly state. As long as Bezos opposed a ban, VA would not be so stupid to ban. Plus, oither states have tried this and its not holding up

? You think companies in TX are fleeing over their abortion ban? Actually, lots of young people moving to TX.

https://cw33.com/news/texas/study-millennials-are-moving-to-these-texas-cities-more-than-most-in-us/

I know NoVa thinks it's immune to state politics, but it isn't.

If VA goes full religious extremist then we are out of here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else just happy that this is the end of Youngkin? Either he comes out in support of a ban and becomes unelectable with his moderate appeal or he doesn't and he becomes unelectable after alienating his base.

Lmao. He's already unelectable. Do you know nothing about how VA gubernatorial politics work? I hope you don't live here, but if you don't, stop worrying yourself about things that don't concern you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I do'nt understand what I'm reading, honestly.

What do you not understand?
Youngkin ran on banning all contraceptives, all abortions, IVF, any women's medical issues. Not one exception for age, rape or incest. So a 10 year old gets pregnant in VA she gets to carry.

The only reason he has not been able to pass anything is L Louise Lucas

There is a chance this will pass.

Virginia voters are idiots. FACT.

From a full abortion ban to privatizing schools welcome to the handmaid's tale and the new Alabama or Missouri.

Anyone sending a college student to any school in VA stupid. Women are going to die in droves.

Youngkin didn't run on those things. During the election people were on here saying he was being secretive about his real plans, telling a pro-lifer that he would do things after he was elected.

Oh please, you had to be a fool to think he was not running on these items.

Everyone with a brain knew he was a liar.

So you agree he wasn't running on those things explicitly. You have to call him a liar to attribute these positions to him.

Depends on what you mean by "explicitly", doesn't it? Did he say, in so many words, that he supported those positions? No. Did he make it clear that he did support them? Yes.

You confirmed the point. Not only was he not running on those things, he didn't even express support according to you. That is more than what Mitt Romney did in Massachusetts, who expressed support but said he wouldn't push any of these things.

He could have done that, but he didn’t. Because he DOES want to push those things.

He said he’d “go on the offense” against women’s rights after the election. He couldn’t talk about it before the election or he’d lose the Independent vote. Words right out of his mouth.

Do you really not understand a politician can state how he personally feels and keep it separate from what he intends to pursue? It's simply not enough for you when a candidate says they're pro life but won't pursue an abortion ban. They must say they're in favor of no holds barred, abortion til end of the pregnancy or they're an extremist, religious zealot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone else just happy that this is the end of Youngkin? Either he comes out in support of a ban and becomes unelectable with his moderate appeal or he doesn't and he becomes unelectable after alienating his base.

Lmao. He's already unelectable. Do you know nothing about how VA gubernatorial politics work? I hope you don't live here, but if you don't, stop worrying yourself about things that don't concern you.

DP. Plenty of governors go on to other elected positions.