GWMS- 6th Grade Teacher Violentlty Attacked

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the teachers pursue it, there were be a police report and then a lawsuit that will be public.

A lawsuit, police report? For a 6th grader?

You do realize that some of the 6th graders are 15, 16 years old and larger than adults?

Um, no. A 6th grader would be 11 or 12 years old. Maybe 13 if they were held back.

There are freshman in high school that are well over 18. You are aware, right?

[Anonymous]

I remember a certain attack in Loudoun county that supposedly didn’t occur either

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the teachers pursue it, there were be a police report and then a lawsuit that will be public.

A lawsuit, police report? For a 6th grader?

You do realize that some of the 6th graders are 15, 16 years old and larger than adults?

Um, no. A 6th grader would be 11 or 12 years old. Maybe 13 if they were held back.

There are freshman in high school that are well over 18. You are aware, right?

It’s pretty rare and they age out on their 22nd birthday. But nice right wing talking point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you do want to talk about something, how about the principal not being on campus since November.

Well, since November was only 9 days ago, that doesn't seem particularly interesting. Is he not allowed to go on vacation, or have a medical issue, or have a family member who may have a medical issue?

Oh no. He's gone. You didn't hear?

What does this mean? The principal is no longer at GWMS?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you do want to talk about something, how about the principal not being on campus since November.

Well, since November was only 9 days ago, that doesn't seem particularly interesting. Is he not allowed to go on vacation, or have a medical issue, or have a family member who may have a medical issue?

Oh no. He's gone. You didn't hear?

What does this mean? The principal is no longer at GWMS?!

Yes. He's going to another county. But I don't know if they have hired a new one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This did not happen and the alleged victim is at school without a broken nose.

Be weary about hearsay and gossip.

Yes. It did happen.

Now, why are you here gaslighting?

No. It didn't.

A counselor was pushed and was sore the following day but no one was bloodied on the floor. Imagine how ridiculous that sounds.

Not ridiculous at all. The real question is, why are you so desperate to sweep this attack under the rug?

A counselor was pushed and knocked over while breaking up a fight and you expect a full press conference about a broken nose that didn't happen.

The counselor is fine and my daughter told me that she was sore after the fall. I sent her well wishes.

My daughter also says there is caution tape on the boys bathroom. Let me guess, you think there was an attack in the bathroom too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This did not happen and the alleged victim is at school without a broken nose.

Be weary about hearsay and gossip.

Yes. It did happen.

Now, why are you here gaslighting?

No. It didn't.

A counselor was pushed and was sore the following day but no one was bloodied on the floor. Imagine how ridiculous that sounds.

Not ridiculous at all. The real question is, why are you so desperate to sweep this attack under the rug?

A counselor was pushed and knocked over while breaking up a fight and you expect a full press conference about a broken nose that didn't happen.

The counselor is fine and my daughter told me that she was sore after the fall. I sent her well wishes.

My daughter also says there is caution tape on the boys bathroom. Let me guess, you think there was an attack in the bathroom too?

With the history of ACPS, an attack in a bathroom would not be unheard of. There is an open police case at GWMS from December 1st.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If you do want to talk about something, how about the principal not being on campus since November.

Well, since November was only 9 days ago, that doesn't seem particularly interesting. Is he not allowed to go on vacation, or have a medical issue, or have a family member who may have a medical issue?

Oh no. He's gone. You didn't hear?

What does this mean? The principal is no longer at GWMS?!

Yes. He's going to another county. But I don't know if they have hired a new one.

If this is true, why has not one of the 10 "communications" people at ACPS communicated this?!? For the $1.7 million in salary and benefits they cost, this is the LEAST they could do!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This did not happen and the alleged victim is at school without a broken nose.

Be weary about hearsay and gossip.

Yes. It did happen.

Now, why are you here gaslighting?

No. It didn't.

A counselor was pushed and was sore the following day but no one was bloodied on the floor. Imagine how ridiculous that sounds.

Not ridiculous at all. The real question is, why are you so desperate to sweep this attack under the rug?

Wow that’s cold! What kind of person are you?
I have never been pushed at work that resulted in soreness the next day and if I did, it would make me nervous about returning to work and especially if I knew the person who did faced no real consequences.

What if that was your DD? Would you still be so blasé?
A counselor was pushed and knocked over while breaking up a fight and you expect a full press conference about a broken nose that didn't happen.

The counselor is fine and my daughter told me that she was sore after the fall. I sent her well wishes.

My daughter also says there is caution tape on the boys bathroom. Let me guess, you think there was an attack in the bathroom too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the student had a disability, I doubt that the school is legally able to share any information about the incident with you.

Helloooo to those who don't understand the protections some of theses violent students are receiving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the teachers pursue it, there were be a police report and then a lawsuit that will be public.

A lawsuit, police report? For a 6th grader?

You do realize that some of the 6th graders are 15, 16 years old and larger than adults?

Um, no. A 6th grader would be 11 or 12 years old. Maybe 13 if they were held back.

There are freshman in high school that are well over 18. You are aware, right?

It’s pretty rare and they age out on their 22nd birthday. But nice right wing talking point.

That is not a right wing talking point; and in some school systems, it's not all that rare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the student had a disability, I doubt that the school is legally able to share any information about the incident with you.

Helloooo to those who don't understand the protections some of theses violent students are receiving.

FERPA applies to all students. The question is whether something can be shared without sharing information that identifies the student by name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m sure the pp meant a lawsuit against the employer/acps, not against the sixth grader.

Workers comp is the exclusive remedy. They can sue the school but it will be dismissed. So as a practical matter, no one will represent them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the student had a disability, I doubt that the school is legally able to share any information about the incident with you.

All kids have the same right to privacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the teachers pursue it, there were be a police report and then a lawsuit that will be public.

A lawsuit, police report? For a 6th grader?

You do realize that some of the 6th graders are 15, 16 years old and larger than adults?

That doesn’t mean you have a right to information about a minor student. What exactly are you seeking to do with this information? Schools are absolutely bound by certain privacy laws that prevent them from disclosing specifics about these incidents, including any disciplinary action. You may not like that but that is the law.

ACPS uses an overly broad interpretation of privacy laws to avoid providing parents sufficient information about risks to health and safety faced by their children in ACPS schools. ACPS could share more than the nothing they generally share by not providing student identifying information about particular students.

This post is bs. Just leaving out a name isn't good enough. It can still violate a student's privacy.