Boundary Review Meetings

[Anonymous]

So maybe next week we will see revised version? Or not to Jan?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One item seemingly glossed over here is reverting that section of townhomes back to Lewis that were going to WSHS in Scenario 4.

I’m not getting into whether scenario 4 made sense, the number of actual kids involved etc - but it’s not called out on the slides numbers etc from what I can tell.

They aren't "going back to Lewis"

They are remaining at their zoned school, which has been Lewis since tgey were built.

That’s exactly what I said. Under scenario four they were going to West Springfield. Remaining the same. Unchanged. Untouched. However, you want to phrase it. It’s a change from scenario four to scenario five that hasn’t been discussed.

You have it backwards.

Map 4 rezoned those neighborhoods.

May 5 leaves them untouched at Lewis.

Scenario 3 moved all of the Rolling Valley homes that are the split feeder to Key/Lewis to Saratoga/Key/Lewis. Scenario 4 moved one small section of that changed area back to Rolling Valley and had them continue on to Irving/West Springfield.
At the local meeting with Reid, it was indicated that scenario 3 was going to be the answer for the Rolling Valley split feeder, but no one knows for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You all seem fun.

+100
Can't believe this thread is still going... reading it is definitely a cure for insomnia.

[Anonymous]

Was it released yet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One item seemingly glossed over here is reverting that section of townhomes back to Lewis that were going to WSHS in Scenario 4.

I’m not getting into whether scenario 4 made sense, the number of actual kids involved etc - but it’s not called out on the slides numbers etc from what I can tell.

They aren't "going back to Lewis"

They are remaining at their zoned school, which has been Lewis since tgey were built.

That’s exactly what I said. Under scenario four they were going to West Springfield. Remaining the same. Unchanged. Untouched. However, you want to phrase it. It’s a change from scenario four to scenario five that hasn’t been discussed.

You have it backwards.

Map 4 rezoned those neighborhoods.

May 5 leaves them untouched at Lewis.

Scenario 3 moved all of the Rolling Valley homes that are the split feeder to Key/Lewis to Saratoga/Key/Lewis. Scenario 4 moved one small section of that changed area back to Rolling Valley and had them continue on to Irving/West Springfield.
At the local meeting with Reid, it was indicated that scenario 3 was going to be the answer for the Rolling Valley split feeder, but no one knows for sure.

Approximately 300 homes is not a small section.

[Anonymous]

Should we expect update this week or you think silence until next year?

[Anonymous]

Today we should have updates from the BRAC meeting they had on Friday

[Anonymous]

They posted it but there’s nothing new here.

https://www.fcps.edu/december-12-2025-superintendents-boundary-review-advisory-committee-meeting

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They posted it but there’s nothing new here.

https://www.fcps.edu/december-12-2025-superintendents-boundary-review-advisory-committee-meeting

This meeting was after the community meeting about Lewis boundaries. And that isn’t mentioned in here anywhere?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They posted it but there’s nothing new here.

https://www.fcps.edu/december-12-2025-superintendents-boundary-review-advisory-committee-meeting

This meeting was after the community meeting about Lewis boundaries. And that isn’t mentioned in here anywhere?

Nope.

The just posted the agenda, plus the same timeline they have been posting repeatedly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They posted it but there’s nothing new here.

https://www.fcps.edu/december-12-2025-superintendents-boundary-review-advisory-committee-meeting

This meeting was after the community meeting about Lewis boundaries. And that isn’t mentioned in here anywhere?

Nope.

The just posted the agenda, plus the same timeline they have been posting repeatedly.

They really dropped any pretense at transparency over the past month.

Michelle Reid is such a fraud.

[Anonymous]

They really think that the community is dumb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They posted it but there’s nothing new here.

https://www.fcps.edu/december-12-2025-superintendents-boundary-review-advisory-committee-meeting

This meeting was after the community meeting about Lewis boundaries. And that isn’t mentioned in here anywhere?

Nope.

The just posted the agenda, plus the same timeline they have been posting repeatedly.

They really dropped any pretense at transparency over the past month.

Michelle Reid is such a fraud.

Looks like we won’t get a new map until Jan when she releases her map to the school board. I guess we’ll see it then? Maybe not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They posted it but there’s nothing new here.

https://www.fcps.edu/december-12-2025-superintendents-boundary-review-advisory-committee-meeting

This meeting was after the community meeting about Lewis boundaries. And that isn’t mentioned in here anywhere?

Nope.

The just posted the agenda, plus the same timeline they have been posting repeatedly.

They really dropped any pretense at transparency over the past month.

Michelle Reid is such a fraud.

Looks like we won’t get a new map until Jan when she releases her map to the school board. I guess we’ll see it then? Maybe not.

They've had multiple meetings now where Reid has not disclosed changes shared with or proposed by the BRAC.

I'm sure the lack of transparency is what Sandy Anderson wants, too. They are both pathetic.

[Anonymous]

From Reid’s latest email. You’ll get 2 days to see the last map before the final meeting to provide comment:

“To expand on the first bullet, I will present my recommendation on proposed boundary changes to the School Board on Thursday, January 8, 2026. A public hearing on the comprehensive boundary review is scheduled for Saturday, January 10, 2026.”