Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bill's been a naughty boy, apparently...
I never fell for his phony "do what I say on climate, etc etc". He doesn't have his own family life together and he's trying to tell other people what to do. Typical.
What does someone’s personal life have to do with climate change or advocacy? I’m genuinely confused. If you aren’t happily married, you shouldn’t be giving to charity or contributing to promote causes you care about?
DP.
Bill has demanded a global platform by throwing money around. He acts like he is an expert on myriad topics and relies on his credibility to be the moral authority on complex issues.
Well, he’s just a kinky rich guy. He’s not the nice scientific expert he wants the world to believe he is.
That still isn't an explanation for why his affairs invalidate his scientific expertise.
DP. He doesn’t actually have any scientific expertise.
DP. What I read is that he has scientific "advisors" that he kept on payroll. One was mixed up with Epstein.
Yes, he has scientific expertise by proxy. And his affairs don't invalidate that.
It calls in everything to question. When you are a liar and cheater in one area it's often found in others as well.
Oh, really. And yet his success in building the biggest software company in the world doesn't count for anything, of course.
Posters on here are celebrating Gates's infidelity because it gives them a license to be free of concern about the philanthropic concerns he espoused. Child poverty and world hunger aren't going anywhere, no matter how many engineers Gates propositioned over email.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}