Public Trump Impeachment Hearing Mega Thread

[Anonymous]

The argument around second hand information is irrelevant. Because the witnesses are credible, we ourselves are witness to Trump’s words, actions, transcripts, behavior, videos, calls, taxes, business dealings, investments - it clearly establishes character around credibility. Testimony is not the deciding factor, it’s a contribution to the final decision in any ruling. And it’s one that everyone can weigh. I’m so tired of people trying to shut down arguments or exerting micro-aggressions, deflecting, and playing a what about game when they don’t know the answer to a question. It’s all wrong. All of it. Everyone needs to get their self together and do the right thing. This party did a dirty move and stole a judge. Judge appointments are for a lifetime. The extent of the damage done by a president abusing his power and threatening this security of the country, and our long standing history of friendship and alliance with the free world? in essence, all humanity in this earth deserves due diligence here.

[Anonymous]

Page 29 has so many Democratic posts that deserve plus ones! Once again, the Democrats grasp what’s happening here and the GOP pps seem confused, angry and wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
DP. What you are doing is not remaining skeptical. You are in full-on denial.

Enough has been made public. It's all laid out. You just don't want to admit it.

If this were Obama, you'd be screaming for impeachment.

Spot on!

And if this were Obama, Democrats would be doing exactly what the Republicans are doing right now: namely, that the impeachment effort is a sham, partisan, baseless, etc.

Such is the reality of politics today!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
DP. What you are doing is not remaining skeptical. You are in full-on denial.

Enough has been made public. It's all laid out. You just don't want to admit it.

If this were Obama, you'd be screaming for impeachment.

Spot on!

And if this were Obama, Democrats would be doing exactly what the Republicans are doing right now: namely, that the impeachment effort is a sham, partisan, baseless, etc.

Such is the reality of politics today!

There. Is. No. Both. Sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:in Devin Nunes opening statement, he chose to peddle the insane conspiracy theory that Ukraine helped Hillary lose the election to later then have the ability to smear Trump after he won and pin it on Russia

Yep. He's totally bonkers, was totally sweating all over himself even though no one else was and the room was ice cold.

Gym Jordan. He ought to resign NOW.

As should the criminal in the White House.

I can't even with you Trumpsters anymore. Willfully ignorant or just plain IGNORANT?

While the Dumpster in Chief hosts and licks the rump of the murdering Erogan whilst his impeachment inquiry is happening. #goodtimes

Yes! If he were my employee, I’d demand he take a drug test. Something is not right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
DP. What you are doing is not remaining skeptical. You are in full-on denial.

Enough has been made public. It's all laid out. You just don't want to admit it.

If this were Obama, you'd be screaming for impeachment.

Spot on!

And if this were Obama, Democrats would be doing exactly what the Republicans are doing right now: namely, that the impeachment effort is a sham, partisan, baseless, etc.

Such is the reality of politics today!

Al Franken and Katie Hill say, 'what you talkin' about, Willis'

[Anonymous]

Defenders of Trump please answer this simple question:

Will you be OK with a democratic President doing the “whatever it takes” to win his/her election? Trump won’t be president forever you know. If your fine with what he did, please say it here. This forum is anonymous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

PP is lying so you didn’t miss anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

Actually, they didn't answer the question. They both stayed absolutely silent, which could have lots of meanings. Maybe they hadn't, maybe they had but it was classified, maybe it didn't occur in the first place.

[Anonymous]

This is the best thing to come out of yesterday's hearing......Look at the whole thread. Very funny.

https://twitter.com/mattdizwhitlock/status/1194714831926038533

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

Actually, they didn't answer the question. They both stayed absolutely silent, which could have lots of meanings. Maybe they hadn't, maybe they had but it was classified, maybe it didn't occur in the first place.

Maybe they recognized it for what it was- a conspiracy theory

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

Actually, they didn't answer the question. They both stayed absolutely silent, which could have lots of meanings. Maybe they hadn't, maybe they had but it was classified, maybe it didn't occur in the first place.

Maybe they recognized it for what it was- a conspiracy theory

Are you saying that believing that Biden demanded Ukraine stop the investigation into Burisma is a conspiracy theory?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

Actually, they didn't answer the question. They both stayed absolutely silent, which could have lots of meanings. Maybe they hadn't, maybe they had but it was classified, maybe it didn't occur in the first place.

Maybe they recognized it for what it was- a conspiracy theory

Are you saying that believing that Biden demanded Ukraine stop the investigation into Burisma is a conspiracy theory?

Believing it was about his son is the conspiracy theory. All of our western allies including the World Bank agreed that Shokin needed to be fired. That was policy, not personal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people who have been saying that this is business as usual, you had two high ranking career public servants with nearly 80 years of service between them who stated that they had never in their long careers under Presidents of both parties encountered a President who used the powerful levers of foreign policy under his control for personal gain.

They also said they never in their long years of serving did they see a Vice President tell a foreign country to stop their investigation in 6 hours or no aid.

Whoa - I missed this yesterday.

Actually, they didn't answer the question. They both stayed absolutely silent, which could have lots of meanings. Maybe they hadn't, maybe they had but it was classified, maybe it didn't occur in the first place.

Maybe they recognized it for what it was- a conspiracy theory

Are you saying that believing that Biden demanded Ukraine stop the investigation into Burisma is a conspiracy theory?

Actually, it was about starting the investigation into Burisma, not stopping it.

But don't let facts get in your way.