Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She may truly believe it was Kavanaugh, but unless there are witnesses that can attest that it was him, it's still a she-said, he-said.

You are out of your damn mind. I was sexually assaulted. Not raped, thank God. It was 32 years ago. I could pick his face out anywhere.

+1 me too.

I'm really sorry. No one in real life knows. This is so awful. Even 32 years later I'm shaking and crying.

Yes, it would seem they don't understand. I would hope people could empathize, but I suppose not. I'm sorry too, for your experience. It's impossible not to relive the situations watching this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s weird she’s doing that shaky voice thing but no actual tears or even pauses to collect herself.

It's anxiety.
I do that whenever I have a bigger-than-usual presentation - highly embarrassing! The principal of my child's elementary school sometimes does that too during her speech at Back-to-School-Night because it's the only time of the year she has to address the entire parent community. I'm sure she's self-conscious about it too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do people who don't believe her or think she's being dramatic think that she is acting?

The other 2 women's stories are so false IMO that it makes this story lose credibility. It's almost like someone is doing anything they can to take BK down. Ya know, kind of like they do with Trump every day?

What do you, personally, think of the fact that Trump himself says he grabbed women’s “pussy” and kissed them without their consent?

+1 Yup, we have him on video saying that. And last night, he says that's why he has sympathy for Kavanaugh. Rotten birds of a feather.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would she come out by writing one letter to Diane Feinstein? That’s just odd. Wouldn’t you write multiple letters to leading SJC members to alert them?

Who the f*ck knows what you would do? Is there some blueprint for how Ford should have surfaced this? She did the best she could and as she is recounting didnso very cautiously.

You can’t write a letter to a scj - it goes to a clerk and would get tossed in the trash.
Also, the scj aren’t at all responsible for appointing other scj or voting yes or no. They are responsible for voting on cases and that’s it.

SJC (Senate Judiciary Committee) not scj (Supreme Court Justice). I do it too, so not being snarky. Just explaining what PP meant.

[Anonymous]

1. Even if she is faking, look at the message we are sending our kids and the world. We don't believe women. We put men's careers first.
2. It's astonishing the many people posting what they have done or would do if in her place. I bet you they're the same people who said don't judge those who don't help others when they're being stabbed in the street because you wouldn't know who they'd react.
3. You need to ask yourself, why are you so quick to defend a man you don't know, whose motives and secrets you don't know, over a woman who you also don't know. Is it because you too might have assaulted someone and hope to discredit them? Or are you part of the group of women who thinks women being assaulted is no big deal? You need to ask yourself why the $uck that is.

[Anonymous]

Wow, she's covering her bases. She needs to read her own letter for accuracy? And is CORRECTING IT??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still kinda think she’s lying, embellishing, or misremembering BK, but after this performance I think for the good of the nation, they should just find another nominee. People are going to believe her and go ape shit. The legitimacy of the Supreme Court will be too negatively affected if he’s confirmed.

Agree

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She may truly believe it was Kavanaugh, but unless there are witnesses that can attest that it was him, it's still a she-said, he-said.

And then it comes down to who is more credible. Educate yourself.

In other words, who cries the most.

No. What a stupid thing to say! The standard in a court of law comes down to credibility and I think in this case will be too. Ask any litigator. Ever heard of character witnesses? Think no one gets convicted or is guilty because no hard evidence. Get real. Who cries the most?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do people who don't believe her or think she's being dramatic think that she is acting?

I think she is embellishing and has ulterior motives

Logically, what are her ulterior motives?

I don't think she's mentally well and I think her family knows that

Wait, wait. Your perspective is changing. You said you think she has ulterior motives. I asked what those could be and you said she's mentally unwell. So she's mentally incapacitated (which, of course, she doesn't appear to be while testifying today), but she *also* has a specific plan and agenda?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't the GOP allowing the other two named victims the opportunity to share their stories?

They are. They contacted them numerous times, no avail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She seems flustered that the sex assault questioner has her texts from WhatsApp.

Yes, because already they are putting her on the defensive. Why didn’t the prosecutor provide exhibits in advance?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please notice how she said nothing about where she went when she left that mysterious house. Or what happened next.

That's critical.

Critical? To what? It's not critical or material or relevant at all.

It's critical for those who are trying to find anything to discredit her.

They are about to try to Anita Hill her but that was a different time.

We can only pray that we have evolved and matured, but I am not too sure. Grassley has all but said that this hearing is perfunctory and that they were voting tomorrow. Where's Mark Judge?

[Anonymous]

The prosecutor seems very impatient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do people who don't believe her or think she's being dramatic think that she is acting?

I think she is embellishing and has ulterior motives

Logically, what are her ulterior motives?

I don't think she's mentally well and I think her family knows that

Now you are just making up crap to throw at her.

Just get a FBI investigation? Oh wait, it will show he has perjured himself multiple times...? yep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how she can recall who was there, but not whose house it was.

I am about the same age and grew up in the area. It was routine for parties to come together spontaneously or kids from one school to go to another school party. I went to scores of parties through high school at people's houses who I didn't know personally.