
I really have no opinion about MM one or the other. I think the difference here, is, as someone said about Martha, she really has talent and skills. Sure she had a lot of wealth and privilege, but she left Wall Street to start her own catering company in her town and it did really well. She’s actually done the grassroots of making a lot of good food and creating great spaces for entertaining and she is a talented and hard working gardener so she has the credibility to be selling books, magazines, shows, and products in that area. Hell she was even able to make interesting recipes and make a garden thrive in prison. You really don’t get more authentic than that. She just took those skills and talents and taught people to do it at mass scale. And I love how she never tries to be something she is not. She never has tried to be warm or inviting or act like she’s your best friend. She is there because she’s really talented and she wants to help you if you want to take her advice. Gwyneth is a little different and I’ve never found her authentic, but I will give her props for not trying to be anybody that she’s not. She’s wealthy and privileged and goop is very much targeted to wealthy and privileged women. That’s fine. GOOP is less about Gwyneth’s talents and more she uses her name and her celebrity and her aspirational qualities and she puts people in touch with products, people, etc they might not have access to. Whereas a Drew Barrymore or Kelly Clarkson have had success in the talkshow space for different reasons - I do think people find them relatable, they’ve been honest about their weight struggles, their divorces, parenting struggles, we’ve seen them a ton without make up and glammed up. People just relate to them. I’m not sure what MM’s sweet spot will be or even if she has one. Seems like she’s probably going more for a Gwyneth vibe vs trying to be relatable and I dont think she has a unique skill set like Martha. She clearly is aspirational, very pretty, and there’s people who want to be like her or do what she recommends. So that might be enough for this show. It’s weird though, because if she doesn’t have the cooking chops, and she’s not super relatable when she talks to friends like Mindy, I don’t see how it will be successful, but who knows. |
I find all celebrities who complain about fame annoying. Meghan complains about the attention in one breath and in the next, begs for it. We have no idea if Kate is a nice person. She has a very disciplined and curated image. I do like that she doesn’t beg for attention and doesn’t seem like a hypocrite. She does her job and lives her life as privately as she can. Meghan claims she wants privacy, but can’t help herself talking about how much she wants privacy. She is her own worst enemy. |
I don't need a thicker skin- it was uncomfortable watching Harry squirm and hearing her giggle and pretend to bow in her chair. I find her off-putting as do many people. If you don't, then great, you can tune in and watch her assemble a fruit platter. Enjoy. |
Haha it is pretty funny that she is on the cover of People magazine promoting her show and then in the next breath discussing how they just want their privacy. I don't understand, she and Harry could easily leverage their connections to get jobs out of the public eye and decline to do interviews. Nothing they say makes sense. |
I like how you reduce her complaints of extreme racist abuse that she received from the media and the family to "she complains about the attention." |
Meghan and Harry never said they wanted privacy. I think they want a break from the more aggro followers who demand weekly pics of their kids and feel entitled to their personal lives. But they never said they didn’t like being in the public eye. It’s clear that she enjoys being famous. |
No snark, but how can you tell that about anyone, really? What is a good mom? |
See, I don’t think the media coverage of her was racist. I think Kate faced very similar scrutiny for a long time. As did Diana. I think Meghan was delusional about what marrying into the royal family would entail on multiple fronts, including brutal media coverage. |
Some of the British coverage was definitely racist, PP.
I’m curious what jobs people think these two could get out of the public eye. What skills do they have? |
Not liking MM and her inauthenticity which has been a consistent and objective theme throughout any evaluation of her does not someone mean one is not a “girls girl” or dislikes women writ large. That tired and reductive trope may make you feel like you got a real zinger in and closed the case but it makes you sound like you belong on tik tok. Wonder off over there please. |
Never happened. Sadly, she definitely decanted pretzel bites from plastic into other, cuter plastic. That happened. And I’m complaining about it! |
People already mentioned it, but I think she dresses nicely. She could have partnered with Nordstrom or Bloomingdale's for a line of linen shirts and dresses, expanded into jewelry. Something like affordable-ish luxury for MC/UMC. Harry has absolutely no skills or use. |
What, don’t you talk about “sacred time” and being “tight-knit” re your own small nuclear family? You aren’t a good mom. Because that’s the evidence, that’s the tell. Plus balloon arches. |
I agree with you on Meghan. Her collaboration for that British fashion charity was nice. Disagree Harry has no use. He served in combat. |
Also never happened. |