NP here. They do still exist, they’re just called something else. |
In my school, we'd go "due process". Essentially, we'd have to have a mediator come in and then probably a lawsuit. In this case, the school would win. They just got bullied by parents OR they had a terrible administration. Or both. |
+1 |
For examplel, https://www.devereux.org/site/SPageServer/;jsessionid=00000000.app20060a?NONCE_TOKEN=E40C73BBAD24C7B766FC86DABAD202A3&pagename=centers |
Another example, https://stewarthome.com/ |
Not this kid. No administrator will want that liability. This kid can do virtual for a few years until he does something that gets him sent to juvie |
+1 for sure |
I’m familiar with Devereux, having worked there. I don’t recall that they take kids as young as six for their residential programs. And I didn’t see anything on the Stewart House website indicating that they take young children for residential or that they take violent kids. People who believe that something exists for kids like this little boy don’t know the reality of institutional programs, which is that very few take violent kids and very few accept kids under the age of 12. |
PP who posted. I appreciate what you're saying. I was just trying to let the PP be aware that there are institutional/group home type settings. I wasn't checking for ages. Also, I have no idea about the cognitive functioning or diagnoses for the 6 year old in Newport News. I do know of some individuals with intellectual disabilities and/or an ASD diagnosis who have been living at the Stewart Home and School. Their website says "all ages." |
+1 and a lot of it is becoming political. There is a true lack of empathy and humanity in our world today. Sad. |
NP here. Just because there are few of them doesn’t equal that institutional homes being obsolete. They do still exist. A good friend of mine had to put her adoptive daughter in one in PA because she was so violent she tried to kill her, her DH and their other child, several times. They tried many other options for years and nothing worked. She was adopted at 12. It was a terrible situation for everyone. They are wealthy so they can afford to pay. |
Oh, for God’s sake. You can — gasp — when a teacher gets SHOT in the classroom. |
![]() |
Students are returning to school today, with clear backpacks and metal detectors.
https://wtop.com/virginia/2023/01/virginia-school-announces-new-safety-protocols-as-students-return-to-class-nearly-a-month-after-a-6-year-old-allegedly-shot-a-teacher/ |
Pretty much every school has a decent percentage of kids who have 2 working parents and no child care coverage. Most of those 2 working households are not in the position for a parent to stay home for weeks on end to watch the kids. Part of the reason virtual learning didn’t work for many kids was that there was no parent available to help the kids because both parents were working. Do you think the people stocking shelves during COVID were doing that because they felt comfortable being out when a highly infectious disease that could kill them was circulating or do you think they were doing it because they had to pay the bills? And if they were risking their lives to keep food on the shelves, do you think that they had the money to be able provide child care for their kids who suddenly were at home? Get out of your economically privileged bubble and take a look at the real world. We ask schools to feed kids, provide counseling for kids, and more because schools are the one place we have access to kids who need help. My kids High School has a food pantry in it so that kids at the high school can pick up food for their family. My kids ES class helps put together backpacks of food for the weekend for kids who get most of their meals from the school. Schools are more then institutions of learning. So yes, a sudden closure of school for 3 weeks is probably a hardship for some of the families at that school. It is not a reason to open the school before it is ready but it is a concern. |