Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
| I want to know about car too, it would explain the box truck? Can car fit on that? What would be the purpose of stealing car? Can not sell it...with out title....too easy to spot and obviously stolen. |
| How would one go about finding the YouTube video? |
| So what is publicly known at this point? That SS hired a personal assistant whom he met at a go-kart track? And the person was fired from the track? What's the source for that information? Where's the source on the Puerto Rico job? |
|
Source of PR job was SS's own FB page, where he announced it.
The Mosler car is not missing. The single news source that mentioned a missing red car is an outlier, and that has been contradicted by charging documents that state police looked all over the car for the money, a manila envelope, and a red bag and found nothing. The red Audi is pictured in the driveway in crime scene pictures. All we know is assistant was "let go" from track. Could be seasonal staffing or cutbacks. No one has said he was fired. The assistant was a bit "gee whiz" about his new job, and he certainly made intentional minor misstatements to police, but there is no indication that he was involved in the robbery, torture, arson, or murders. |
Thanks. Hadn't seen sources for some of this. Did friends of the family know SS was taking a job in PR? Was the family moving there? It seems unusual that a CEO of a successful company would take another job. |
I'm amazed at how poorly this has been reported. The PR gig is purely an advisory capacity. It is not a wholesale move to PR for the entire family. |
That makes more sense. Thank you. News outlets, some at least, keep sloppily stringing together pieces of old stories. What kind of advising was involved? |
| I heard from someone that wife was looking at houses in Puerto Rico. Can not obviously elaborate. |
|
Advisory capacity in what way? Hedge fund sounds really suspect...
Steel construction? |
It's been deleted from this thread and I can't find seem to find it online. |
| ^^ sorry for the typos |
| Reason for letting 4 seeming accomplices go without arrest is simple: under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, certain "speedy trial" rights attach at the moment of arrest. There's a clock that starts, and prosecutors have a limited amount of time within which to obtain an indictment. If they don't, the charges get dismissed. No one wants anybody connected with this crime to be sprung on this basis. With Darron Wint, prosecutors had telltale DNA evidence placing him at the scene of the crime. Easy indictment. The others were clearly involved after the fact, but it may take time and more thorough analysis of evidence to place them at the scene. If they had a role in torturing and murdering this family, you don't want them convicted simply as accessories; you want them charged as principals. I'm sure that arrests will come in the next couple of weeks, and meanwhile, these folks are being watched like hawks. |
|
Also, I'm guessing that smart detectives have suggested to each and every one of them that the others are going to blame YOU for the crime, when we know you had a minor role, etc. Thus, YOU should talk and tell us what really happened.
Classic prisoner's dilemma. |
Well the good thing is right now they have the name, address, probably DNA (no arrest, but individual questioning, give them a glass of water...) of all those guys they picked up with DDW. Feds probably know exactly where all of them are. At least I'm banking on that. When they are ready there won't be any APB's issued to find them, and I doubt any of them will do anything to draw attention to themselves in the meantime.... |
I am going to donate. however, I thought the same thing. |