Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Tyler Robinson’s Grandmother spoke with TheDailyMail, stating the family is “All MAGA” and “not a single Democrat”.

- TheDailyBeast

Tyler Robinson Spoke with Family About Charlie Kirk Before Assassination, Says Governor

Cox relayed the account of a family member, who said that during a family dinner prior to the shooting, Robinson had mentioned that Kirk was coming to Utah Valley University.

"They talked about why they didn’t like him and the viewpoints that he had,” the governor said, adding that the suspect said that "Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate."
https://people.com/tyler-robinson-had-talked-to-family-about-charlie-kirk-before-assassination-says-governor-11808767

Does Granny know that Tyler and another family member were discussing Kirk and their dislike for Kirk at a family dinner? And how a family member is quoted as saying Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate?

He was a disturbed young person poisoned by our current toxic political landscape. What granny says or what you and I think doesn't change that fact.

so granny is an unreliable source?

It’s hilarious how dcum liberals will twist themselves into pretzels trying to defend their position or further their fake narratives.

One minute, granny is being quoted by the Daily Beast. The next, her words are unworthy of any weight.

Exactly. Same with sources, as was pointed out earlier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What he wrote on the shell casings and his comments about Charlie “spreading hate” confirm the shooters political beliefs. What do you have to gain by pretending that he wasn’t a leftist ?

This

It's all references to gamer memes and sayings moron. Are all gamers leftist?

[Anonymous]

https://www.professorwatchlist.org/aboutus

from someone who "believed in debate" and supported "free speech"

[Anonymous]

Anyone can access 4chan or 8kun. It's not hard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In summary:

The hateful anti American Charlie Kirk was shot by the acolyte of a more hateful version of Charlie Kirk.

It wasn’t any of the imaginary bogeymen they were hoping for.

Just a case of them slowly drowning in their own hate.

Uh, no. But your continued feverish fake scenarios are duly noted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:David Shuster is a former MSNBC reporter:

and also a former Fox News reporter.

Also of The Young Turks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In summary:

The hateful anti American Charlie Kirk was shot by the acolyte of a more hateful version of Charlie Kirk.

It wasn’t any of the imaginary bogeymen they were hoping for.

Just a case of them slowly drowning in their own hate.

True.

And yet, I feel no schadenfreude. Just sadness for what our discourse and our democracy have become.

Barring some miraculous turnaround, under a yet to be known leader, I feel like the country is pretty cooked, at least for a decade or two.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We don't need media links reporting as secondary sources, when the primary sources (right wing online communities) are readily available and accessible.

WHAT RIGHT WING ONLINE COMMUNITY?

Post a link from a reputable source.

You don’t know the shooter, so any guesses you make are your theories.

Wait a second. Immediately after the shooting your Trump hero blamed it on the lunatic left. You didn't condemn him (and other MAGA lunatics). Now that it is more and more clearer that the shooter himself was a right wing lunatic, we have to be patient and learn more about his motives. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

DP. Have you read some of the unhinged rants on this forum? Or do you studiously ignore those?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God it was a just a White person with access to guns! Can you imagine if it was a brown person. Holy Moly. There would have been bloodshed.

Tater Tots and poached Pears!! Also, wow...where do you train for this? Did not miss even from a rooftop?

This death has really shifted focus from bad economy and Epstein files. Kirk was very disposable person. And not a NEPO BABY!!

You can't be serious.

Yes. I am serious. We are completely anti-gun people. My religion believes in non-violence. If I was ever given a gun, I won't even know how to use it.

When our kids were little, we would ask people if they had guns at home and would not let them go for playdates. So, a non-military young person is able to handle a sniper gun, climb the roof top, kill in one shot...this is extraordinary.

Where does an average Joe learn how to load, shoot, assemble, disassemble a sniper gun? How do you learn how to climb up a rooftop and shoot from there like a sniper, if you have not been trained in it? Yes, obviously there are civilians who are near guns and don't shy away from it - but an expert level training and execution?

Anyways...two families destroyed. So sad for the victim and the killer. What a waste.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In summary:

The hateful anti American Charlie Kirk was shot by the acolyte of a more hateful version of Charlie Kirk.

It wasn’t any of the imaginary bogeymen they were hoping for.

Just a case of them slowly drowning in their own hate.

True.

And yet, I feel no schadenfreude. Just sadness for what our discourse and our democracy have become.

Barring some miraculous turnaround, under a yet to be known leader, I feel like the country is pretty cooked, at least for a decade or two.

+its going to take a miracle to fix this. This week made me realize how bad it has became. It was honestly scary to watch the behaviors people were exhibiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We don't need media links reporting as secondary sources, when the primary sources (right wing online communities) are readily available and accessible.

WHAT RIGHT WING ONLINE COMMUNITY?

Post a link from a reputable source.

You don’t know the shooter, so any guesses you make are your theories.

Wait a second. Immediately after the shooting your Trump hero blamed it on the lunatic left. You didn't condemn him (and other MAGA lunatics). Now that it is more and more clearer that the shooter himself was a right wing lunatic, we have to be patient and learn more about his motives. Got it.

Post sources you are finding that information.

[Anonymous]

Two shootings in the same day both white Christian male radicalized by MAGA and Trump and Kirk

9/11 was yesterday I stress of honoring the fallen that died for this country heroes Republicans are making an anti alert pos a cult hero.

The US has fallen because of con men

Charlie Kirk was worth $ 27.000 before he founded his hateful anti American cult a few years later maga funds him millions of their hard earned monies while he steals them blind and helps take all of the freedom our 9/21 hero’s gave us with their lives.

Snake oil sakes man who spewed violence day in and day out. And maga wonders why one of their own killed him. Cult of stupidity to the max

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

DP. Have you read some of the unhinged rants on this forum? Or do you studiously ignore those?

Like this?

“Hey, I think that people should wear masks to prevent disease.”

“OMG THE TYRANNY MAN THE GUNPORTS REVOLUTION NOW!!!!l. RJE LINATIC LEFT IS STEALING MY RIFHTS!!!1!1!1”

…and so forth.