Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

DP. Have you read some of the unhinged rants on this forum? Or do you studiously ignore those?

The problem with anonymous forums is you have no idea who is posting the violent screed. We only looked at posts with identification. FB had plenty!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God it was a just a White person with access to guns! Can you imagine if it was a brown person. Holy Moly. There would have been bloodshed.

Tater Tots and poached Pears!! Also, wow...where do you train for this? Did not miss even from a rooftop?

This death has really shifted focus from bad economy and Epstein files. Kirk was very disposable person. And not a NEPO BABY!!

You can't be serious.

Yes. I am serious. We are completely anti-gun people. My religion believes in non-violence. If I was ever given a gun, I won't even know how to use it.

When our kids were little, we would ask people if they had guns at home and would not let them go for playdates. So, a non-military young person is able to handle a sniper gun, climb the roof top, kill in one shot...this is extraordinary.

Where does an average Joe learn how to load, shoot, assemble, disassemble a sniper gun? How do you learn how to climb up a rooftop and shoot from there like a sniper, if you have not been trained in it? Yes, obviously there are civilians who are near guns and don't shy away from it - but an expert level training and execution?

Anyways...two families destroyed. So sad for the victim and the killer. What a waste.

It wasn’t a sniper gun. It was a hunting gun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

DP. Have you read some of the unhinged rants on this forum? Or do you studiously ignore those?

People on the left have strong feelings about issues. Especially about trans rights, Gaza, and Donald Trump. They seldom kill people. That's the line. That's the difference. They don't believe in violence.

[Anonymous]

The Dems, and their accomplices in the Intelligence Community, control news outlets, social media platforms, newspapers, magazines, radio, academia, Hollywood, music, and more.

They used control of these institutions to brainwash the masses to hate Trump and his supporters.

This is not an isolated incident. This is a widespread disease that has infected the minds of millions, and it was done so intentionally. This is by design.

We are dealing with people who have been literally brainwashed by everything they consume, to hate us and everything we stand for.

We are living in an Orwellian dystopia.

[Anonymous]

The silence from Republicans today about the shooter's identity is deafening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

DP. Have you read some of the unhinged rants on this forum? Or do you studiously ignore those?

People on the left have strong feelings about issues. Especially about trans rights, Gaza, and Donald Trump. They seldom kill people. That's the line. That's the difference. They don't believe in violence.

Any conversation that suggests that democrats are more violent than the right can be promptly ignored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We don't need media links reporting as secondary sources, when the primary sources (right wing online communities) are readily available and accessible.

WHAT RIGHT WING ONLINE COMMUNITY?

Post a link from a reputable source.

You don’t know the shooter, so any guesses you make are your theories.

Wait a second. Immediately after the shooting your Trump hero blamed it on the lunatic left. You didn't condemn him (and other MAGA lunatics). Now that it is more and more clearer that the shooter himself was a right wing lunatic, we have to be patient and learn more about his motives. Got it.

Post sources you are finding that information.

Do I need sources to demonstrate that Trump and Nancy Mace blamed the killing on the left and transgender people? Are you that misinformed that you need sources?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Dems, and their accomplices in the Intelligence Community, control news outlets, social media platforms, newspapers, magazines, radio, academia, Hollywood, music, and more.

They used control of these institutions to brainwash the masses to hate Trump and his supporters.

This is not an isolated incident. This is a widespread disease that has infected the minds of millions, and it was done so intentionally. This is by design.

We are dealing with people who have been literally brainwashed by everything they consume, to hate us and everything we stand for.

We are living in an Orwellian dystopia.

+1

While they chant in unison, Trump is a fascist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God it was a just a White person with access to guns! Can you imagine if it was a brown person. Holy Moly. There would have been bloodshed.

Tater Tots and poached Pears!! Also, wow...where do you train for this? Did not miss even from a rooftop?

This death has really shifted focus from bad economy and Epstein files. Kirk was very disposable person. And not a NEPO BABY!!

You can't be serious.

Yes. I am serious. We are completely anti-gun people. My religion believes in non-violence. If I was ever given a gun, I won't even know how to use it.

When our kids were little, we would ask people if they had guns at home and would not let them go for playdates. So, a non-military young person is able to handle a sniper gun, climb the roof top, kill in one shot...this is extraordinary.

Where does an average Joe learn how to load, shoot, assemble, disassemble a sniper gun? How do you learn how to climb up a rooftop and shoot from there like a sniper, if you have not been trained in it? Yes, obviously there are civilians who are near guns and don't shy away from it - but an expert level training and execution?

Anyways...two families destroyed. So sad for the victim and the killer. What a waste.

It wasn’t a sniper gun. It was a hunting gun.

Interesting critique, maga.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thank God it was a just a White person with access to guns! Can you imagine if it was a brown person. Holy Moly. There would have been bloodshed.

Tater Tots and poached Pears!! Also, wow...where do you train for this? Did not miss even from a rooftop?

This death has really shifted focus from bad economy and Epstein files. Kirk was very disposable person. And not a NEPO BABY!!

You can't be serious.

Yes. I am serious. We are completely anti-gun people. My religion believes in non-violence. If I was ever given a gun, I won't even know how to use it.

When our kids were little, we would ask people if they had guns at home and would not let them go for playdates. So, a non-military young person is able to handle a sniper gun, climb the roof top, kill in one shot...this is extraordinary.

Where does an average Joe learn how to load, shoot, assemble, disassemble a sniper gun? How do you learn how to climb up a rooftop and shoot from there like a sniper, if you have not been trained in it? Yes, obviously there are civilians who are near guns and don't shy away from it - but an expert level training and execution?

Anyways...two families destroyed. So sad for the victim and the killer. What a waste.

His family was very into guns and proud of how much of a "gun-toting" red blooded American he was, per his mother's social media posts. That's where he learned it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Dems, and their accomplices in the Intelligence Community, control news outlets, social media platforms, newspapers, magazines, radio, academia, Hollywood, music, and more.

They used control of these institutions to brainwash the masses to hate Trump and his supporters.

This is not an isolated incident. This is a widespread disease that has infected the minds of millions, and it was done so intentionally. This is by design.

We are dealing with people who have been literally brainwashed by everything they consume, to hate us and everything we stand for.

We are living in an Orwellian dystopia.

+1

While they chant in unison, Trump is a fascist.

While you chant in unison we will not be replaced!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is the shooter thought Charlie Kirk was a fascist, like dcum. But Kirk supported free markets. Fascism is state control of private enterprise through regulation and taxation, a system the far left actually embraces. By definition, the shooter’s own politics were closer to fascism.

I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really.

The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd.

We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies.

Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense.

Well, the shooter might just be out of his mind. And strengthened by an extremist online right wing community. Or, he might have written that on the bullet for some other reason. Probably someone will ask him at the trial and we'll know then.

Are you unaware of the extremist online left wing community?

Or just ignoring them?

DP.

I’d like an answer here too. And not some childish question posing as a response.

Are unsafe or just ignoring them? Can you answer the question?

There is an extreme left wing online presence. They spend a lot time talking about cultural appropriation and other intersectional topics. I am unaware of a violent leftist online community. Violence isn’t a liberal vibe really. I’m sure there is probably some really out there liberals who may advocate violence but it’s in corners of the internet where I don’t go. My old job with Congress often would identify violent posts for security but on the left, they were individuals not formal groups like militia or hate groups.

DP. Have you read some of the unhinged rants on this forum? Or do you studiously ignore those?

People on the left have strong feelings about issues. Especially about trans rights, Gaza, and Donald Trump. They seldom kill people. That's the line. That's the difference. They don't believe in violence.

+1.

My MAGA brother posted a meme joking about running over protesters at the time of the No Kings protest. This is the kind of humor that exists in regular right wing forums like FB pages and groups. PS, a RWNJ actually did drive their car into a No Kings protest in Culpepper, VA at the time. Wonder where they got the idea when memes like that were all on right wing forums?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Dems, and their accomplices in the Intelligence Community, control news outlets, social media platforms, newspapers, magazines, radio, academia, Hollywood, music, and more.

They used control of these institutions to brainwash the masses to hate Trump and his supporters.

This is not an isolated incident. This is a widespread disease that has infected the minds of millions, and it was done so intentionally. This is by design.

We are dealing with people who have been literally brainwashed by everything they consume, to hate us and everything we stand for.

We are living in an Orwellian dystopia.

+1

While they chant in unison, Trump is a fascist.

While you chant in unison we will not be replaced!

Who bashed in the head of a police officer at the Capitol building again? With a flagpole? Oh yeah! A MAGA guy on January 6th. Wasn't he let out of jail? Who respects democracy again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We don't need media links reporting as secondary sources, when the primary sources (right wing online communities) are readily available and accessible.

WHAT RIGHT WING ONLINE COMMUNITY?

Post a link from a reputable source.

You don’t know the shooter, so any guesses you make are your theories.

Wait a second. Immediately after the shooting your Trump hero blamed it on the lunatic left. You didn't condemn him (and other MAGA lunatics). Now that it is more and more clearer that the shooter himself was a right wing lunatic, we have to be patient and learn more about his motives. Got it.

Post sources you are finding that information.

Do I need sources to demonstrate that Trump and Nancy Mace blamed the killing on the left and transgender people? Are you that misinformed that you need sources?

There are tons of videos of Trump and other GOP politicians blaming and threatening Democrats or the left. FFS MAGA are so steeped in lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Dems, and their accomplices in the Intelligence Community, control news outlets, social media platforms, newspapers, magazines, radio, academia, Hollywood, music, and more.

They used control of these institutions to brainwash the masses to hate Trump and his supporters.

This is not an isolated incident. This is a widespread disease that has infected the minds of millions, and it was done so intentionally. This is by design.

We are dealing with people who have been literally brainwashed by everything they consume, to hate us and everything we stand for.

We are living in an Orwellian dystopia.

Tel us more about the dystopia in which Charlie Kirk was not right wing enough for some right wing lunatics. Was that dystopia created by Hollywood and Democrats as well?