Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually agree with that outcome until Elaine made her rounds with the talk show circuit screaming unfair trial, how her client is the real victim, how this is a loss for women's rights, and their plan to appeal the verdict. They are doubling down criticizing the judge, jurors, social media while never admitting their own mistakes and AH's issues with credibility. How can JD move on if AH's team is still attacking him? I think JD's monetary award is the best way to keep her from causing more troubles. Maybe they can broker a deal where she has to move on (no appeal) if he doesn't seek to collect the debt?

If I had lost 6 weeks of my life to serve as a juror for that circus of a trial, followed all of the instructions and refrained from looking at social media and discussing the case and then had the counsel for the losing side insinuate that I'd broken the rules I would be beyond FURIOUS. Not a good look, Elaine.

I do not think they had to "break the rules" to hear something. There are TV feeds at train stations, restaurants, grocery lines, airports, waiting rooms, etc. There are radio feeds and conversations in public spaces. You would not have had to look anything up or actually engage in a conversation to
hear things about this trial. That is what I think EB was referring to. As a juror, would you stick your fingers in your ears at work or at a bus stop if people were talking? Maybe you could wear ear buds ever day....

Metro has televisions in the subways now? Restaurants with televisions are airing ESPN not E TV. I doubt the jurors were in the airports as they were stuck on this jury. What waiting rooms?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He didn’t need to pursue this trial to “get his life back” or whatever that means. The verdict is wrong regardless of whether she lied. He’s vindictive and should not work in major films again.

He should work in any major film as pong as people want to cast him and watch him. Luckily, you don’t have any saying.

Either do you. Considering Disney released him from pirates without knowledge of the op-ed, major studios are not interested in an alcoholic, drug addicted man. Add on his abusive behavior and they are right to steer clear.

He'll be back in movies. He's very much in demand now. He's riding a popularity wave.

Maybe right wing propaganda movies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

She still has the 7million from the divorce.

Right? Unless she spent it all. But how? She had Musk paying for things at one point and she also got paid for aquaman. Where did all her money go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

Oh, absolutely not on all counts. Sure, she can’t pay tens of millions, but she should feel the ongoing, severe financial consequences of her decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

He didn’t need to pursue this trial to “get his life back” or whatever that means. The verdict is wrong regardless of whether she lied. He’s vindictive and should not work in major films again.

The verdict is correct. He already has major film offers. She, on the other hand…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

She still has the 7million from the divorce.

Right? Unless she spent it all. But how? She had Musk paying for things at one point and she also got paid for aquaman. Where did all her money go?

How much do you think these teams of lawyers cost? She lives in a modest house by celebrity standards ~800k, doesn't seem to live an extravagant life at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

She still has the 7million from the divorce.

Right? Unless she spent it all. But how? She had Musk paying for things at one point and she also got paid for aquaman. Where did all her money go?

How much do you think these teams of lawyers cost? She lives in a modest house by celebrity standards ~800k, doesn't seem to live an extravagant life at all.

Didn't we hear her insurance is paying for her lawyers and experts?

[Anonymous]

I thought there was testimony that her contract paid $1 mill on Aquaman and of course $7 mill from the divorce. I wondered if the jury considered that $8 mill, even subconsciously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually agree with that outcome until Elaine made her rounds with the talk show circuit screaming unfair trial, how her client is the real victim, how this is a loss for women's rights, and their plan to appeal the verdict. They are doubling down criticizing the judge, jurors, social media while never admitting their own mistakes and AH's issues with credibility. How can JD move on if AH's team is still attacking him? I think JD's monetary award is the best way to keep her from causing more troubles. Maybe they can broker a deal where she has to move on (no appeal) if he doesn't seek to collect the debt?

If I had lost 6 weeks of my life to serve as a juror for that circus of a trial, followed all of the instructions and refrained from looking at social media and discussing the case and then had the counsel for the losing side insinuate that I'd broken the rules I would be beyond FURIOUS. Not a good look, Elaine.

I do not think they had to "break the rules" to hear something. There are TV feeds at train stations, restaurants, grocery lines, airports, waiting rooms, etc. There are radio feeds and conversations in public spaces. You would not have had to look anything up or actually engage in a conversation to
hear things about this trial. That is what I think EB was referring to. As a juror, would you stick your fingers in your ears at work or at a bus stop if people were talking? Maybe you could wear ear buds ever day....

Metro has televisions in the subways now? Restaurants with televisions are airing ESPN not E TV. I doubt the jurors were in the airports as they were stuck on this jury. What waiting rooms?

not sure what is in the metro- Amtrak, airports, grocery stores, auto repair all have CNN running constantly and Microsoft is always trying to
put news feeds on devices, but YMMV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

She still has the 7million from the divorce.

Right? Unless she spent it all. But how? She had Musk paying for things at one point and she also got paid for aquaman. Where did all her money go?

How much do you think these teams of lawyers cost? She lives in a modest house by celebrity standards ~800k, doesn't seem to live an extravagant life at all.

Didn't we hear her insurance is paying for her lawyers and experts?

Yes. Her homeowner’s policy is paying for her defense. In fact the Vice President of Travelers Insurance (her insurance provider) has been seen with Heard and in the courtroom sitting on her side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought there was testimony that her contract paid $1 mill on Aquaman and of course $7 mill from the divorce. I wondered if the jury considered that $8 mill, even subconsciously.

She also go 2 million from doing aquaman 2 which will come out in 2023. She has already been paid for that and will keep her earnings even if they drop all her scenes. She also has a L’Oréal contract.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought there was testimony that her contract paid $1 mill on Aquaman and of course $7 mill from the divorce. I wondered if the jury considered that $8 mill, even subconsciously.

She also go 2 million from doing aquaman 2 which will come out in 2023. She has already been paid for that and will keep her earnings even if they drop all her scenes. She also has a L’Oréal contract.

Remember after taxes and agent cut it's not that much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

He didn’t need to pursue this trial to “get his life back” or whatever that means. The verdict is wrong regardless of whether she lied. He’s vindictive and should not work in major films again.

He should work in any major film as pong as people want to cast him and watch him. Luckily, you don’t have any saying.

Either do you. Considering Disney released him from pirates without knowledge of the op-ed, major studios are not interested in an alcoholic, drug addicted man. Add on his abusive behavior and they are right to steer clear.

He'll be back in movies. He's very much in demand now. He's riding a popularity wave.

Maybe right wing propaganda movies

Right wing propaganda? Have you heard him speak about politics?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OK, so I’ve been very critical of Amber, and I agree with the verdict.

But I also think that the right thing for Johnny to do now is to make sure that she doesn’t have to pay him that money.

He’s won and gotten what he said he wanted: his “life back.” He doesn’t need the money, and she’s clearly a very sick woman with some severe mental health issues. She can’t pay, and she isn’t likely to get another movie role that will allow her to pay. Her mental health issues (BPD) mean that, as was shown in the trial, she can’t keep friends and is largely alone with her illness. And she has a baby.

I think the only right think for Johnny to do now is to ensure she doesn’t have to pay, urge his fans to leave her alone, and move on with his life and career.

I will be very disappointed in him if that doesn’t happen.

She still has the 7million from the divorce.

Right? Unless she spent it all. But how? She had Musk paying for things at one point and she also got paid for aquaman. Where did all her money go?

How much do you think these teams of lawyers cost? She lives in a modest house by celebrity standards ~800k, doesn't seem to live an extravagant life at all.

It's already been reported and confirmed that she accessed her home owner's insurance policy and the insurance company is paying her legal fees. I wonder if the insurance adjuster refused to make an offer before trial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually agree with that outcome until Elaine made her rounds with the talk show circuit screaming unfair trial, how her client is the real victim, how this is a loss for women's rights, and their plan to appeal the verdict. They are doubling down criticizing the judge, jurors, social media while never admitting their own mistakes and AH's issues with credibility. How can JD move on if AH's team is still attacking him? I think JD's monetary award is the best way to keep her from causing more troubles. Maybe they can broker a deal where she has to move on (no appeal) if he doesn't seek to collect the debt?

If I had lost 6 weeks of my life to serve as a juror for that circus of a trial, followed all of the instructions and refrained from looking at social media and discussing the case and then had the counsel for the losing side insinuate that I'd broken the rules I would be beyond FURIOUS. Not a good look, Elaine.

I do not think they had to "break the rules" to hear something. There are TV feeds at train stations, restaurants, grocery lines, airports, waiting rooms, etc. There are radio feeds and conversations in public spaces. You would not have had to look anything up or actually engage in a conversation to
hear things about this trial. That is what I think EB was referring to. As a juror, would you stick your fingers in your ears at work or at a bus stop if people were talking? Maybe you could wear ear buds ever day....

Metro has televisions in the subways now? Restaurants with televisions are airing ESPN not E TV. I doubt the jurors were in the airports as they were stuck on this jury. What waiting rooms?

not sure what is in the metro- Amtrak, airports, grocery stores, auto repair all have CNN running constantly and Microsoft is always trying to
put news feeds on devices, but YMMV.

Yeah but the jurors were not on Amtrak or the airports. They were sitting in a courthouse for six weeks and unable to travel. There are no televisions in the grocery stores playing the court cases and CNN, not even Harris Teeter or Whole Foods. I cannot speak for autobody shops.