Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of Theranos, finally charged

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

At least she's IN prison. Most of our white collar criminals are not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

. Yes the entitled, arrogant white privilege is astounding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

This is not prison. It’s daycare.
Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

At least she's IN prison. Most of our white collar criminals are not.

[Anonymous]

Evidently she just had her baby pawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

At least she's IN prison. Most of our white collar criminals are not.

No she’s not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

At least she's IN prison. Most of our white collar criminals are not.

So true. I worked at a company where the CEO was convicted of a white collar crime. He never served a day in prison.

He stole millions and was given house arrest. His home was a 12,000 sqft house with a pool and tennis court. The only "slap" on the wrist he got was not being granted permission to travel outside of his primary state of residence. The horror!

He got off house arrest and years later, he got caught doing the same crime again. He for sure went to prison, right? Nope. House arrest again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

At least she's IN prison. Most of our white collar criminals are not.

So true. I worked at a company where the CEO was convicted of a white collar crime. He never served a day in prison.

He stole millions and was given house arrest. His home was a 12,000 sqft house with a pool and tennis court. The only "slap" on the wrist he got was not being granted permission to travel outside of his primary state of residence. The horror!

He got off house arrest and years later, he got caught doing the same crime again. He for sure went to prison, right? Nope. House arrest again.

Many don't even get that. They just get fined- like the Florida Medicare Fraudster literally defrauded medicare. Fined and elected. Nice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

At least she's IN prison. Most of our white collar criminals are not.

So true. I worked at a company where the CEO was convicted of a white collar crime. He never served a day in prison.

He stole millions and was given house arrest. His home was a 12,000 sqft house with a pool and tennis court. The only "slap" on the wrist he got was not being granted permission to travel outside of his primary state of residence. The horror!

He got off house arrest and years later, he got caught doing the same crime again. He for sure went to prison, right? Nope. House arrest again.

Many don't even get that. They just get fined- like the Florida Medicare Fraudster literally defrauded medicare. Fined and elected. Nice.

She isn’t in prison and hasn’t been. That’s the point. She keeps using the babies as an excuse not to go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Now she’s had a second baby in a short amount of time and doesn’t want to serve any jail time due to her “two young children.” A lot of speculation whether she had the kids as part of her legal strategy.

https://independenttribune.com/news/national/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-to-second-child-while-seeking-to-further-delay-imprisonment/article_9a96169d-9493-5e9c-92c0-0ef9726ea09e.html

She should already be in jail. Many women have to give birth while in jail serving their time. Should have been no different for her.

A girl I went to school with was found guilty and out in jail while she was pregnant. I think they baby stayed with her for a bit (in jail after she was born). She was a white collar criminal and her husband was, too.

This is definitely possible in certain minimum security prisons. I think the babies remain with the mom for the first 6 - 12 mons. That should have been Elizabeth.

Except she should be in maximum security. Won’t likely happen though will it. What’s the latest on her since she was caught trying to leave the country?

Already they are talking about some hybrid prison where she only goes 4 days/week or something and is home the other days. The privilege is staggering.

OMG.

[Anonymous]

I guess she had her baby. I just find her so unlikeable and I am so disgusted by they way she is using her reproductive system to manipulate the system.
https://people.com/crime/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-2nd-child-asks-judge-remain-out-of-prison/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess she had her baby. I just find her so unlikeable and I am so disgusted by they way she is using her reproductive system to manipulate the system.
https://people.com/crime/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-2nd-child-asks-judge-remain-out-of-prison/

It's fine as long as the father gets the same special treatment.

[Anonymous]

Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?