Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of Theranos, finally charged

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I guess she had her baby. I just find her so unlikeable and I am so disgusted by they way she is using her reproductive system to manipulate the system.
https://people.com/crime/elizabeth-holmes-gives-birth-2nd-child-asks-judge-remain-out-of-prison/

Yes this was discussed a while ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?

Ding ding ding

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?

Ding ding ding

Who cares. A newborn needs its mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?

Ding ding ding

Who cares. A newborn needs its mother.

No newborn needs this mother. She's a sociopath.

And what about all the newborns of non-white mothers who are in prison?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?

Ding ding ding

Who cares. A newborn needs its mother.

If she weren’t married to a hotel heir she’d be in jail

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?

Ding ding ding

Who cares. A newborn needs its mother.

If she weren’t married to a hotel heir she’d be in jail

I mean, his family owns 3 hotels and his net worth is estimated at $10M. I know law partners with more money than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who thinks she’s going to be pregnant again in two months as another bid to avoid/delay the term?

Ding ding ding

Who cares. A newborn needs its mother.

If she weren’t married to a hotel heir she’d be in jail

She could just as easily keep getting knocked up by a poor guy.

[Anonymous]

She definitely has crazy eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

Agree. Plus., I’ve sadly known more than one snake oil sales(wo)man so it’s easier for me to spot them. Many people are naive and gullible though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

The thing is she's very cute, with a strong educational and family pedigree, and men (and women) fall for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

She should go to prison but 11 years seems excessive and a waste of tax payor resources. Yes she is a con woman but plenty of her investors couldn't wait to hand over millions to her without doing their own due diligence, willingly igoring red flags (walgreens), refusing to listen to whitle blowers etc...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

She should go to prison but 11 years seems excessive and a waste of tax payor resources. Yes she is a con woman but plenty of her investors couldn't wait to hand over millions to her without doing their own due diligence, willingly igoring red flags (walgreens), refusing to listen to whitle blowers etc...

No 11 years is not excessive. It’s meant to be punitive and a deterrent to others like her. All prisoners cost taxpayers money. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t send them to prison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

The thing is she's very cute, with a strong educational and family pedigree, and men (and women) fall for that.

White privileges. Black mother of newborn would be in jail long time ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She definitely has crazy eyes.

It still blows my mind that she managed to con so many people. When I meet someone who looks like that, I back away slowly and get the hell out of there.

She should go to prison but 11 years seems excessive and a waste of tax payor resources. Yes she is a con woman but plenty of her investors couldn't wait to hand over millions to her without doing their own due diligence, willingly igoring red flags (walgreens), refusing to listen to whitle blowers etc...

Are you really blaming victims? I bet you have the same approach to the sex trafficking victims.