Lewandowski even referred to "the Clinton Administration" yesterday.
WTF |
We already knew that Lewandowski is a moron. |
Who cares if a criminal lost an election? You think she should get off?? No. Just no. |
Lol. She shouldn't get off, if she committed a crime. But she's not the most important political person under investigation by a special counsel right now. You sound easily distracted, like a golden retriever who sees a squirrel. |
They don't seem to understand that if a private citizen commits a crime, that's bad; but if the POTUS does, it's a more serious matter, lol. |
Why did you bring her up? You may leave her alone, ok? |
Enlightening. Very. People aren't asking questions because it's nearly impossible to believe they have to be asked. Ironically, it's all the questions raised about Clinton - A YEAR LATER - that make the Trump camp so suspicious. |
Perhaps you're unaware, she did it as Secretary of State, remember? |
I think it's more likely Roger Stone is a red herring. Or chosen scapegoat. Or assigned to create a distraction. Or take the fall. They're all fitting and it could very well be all of the above. |
Did what exactly? |
We don't prosecute losers of elections. That's some Third World strongman bullshit right there. |
You are correct. We don’t prosecute losers of elections, just for being a losing candidate. OTOH, if said candidate did something criminal, then charging and prosecuting is appropriate. |
+1. So one of trumps henchmen is trying to tally the base. Who cares? She’s a 70year old retired grandma. Indict her if there is a crime. It will change exactly nothing in this country. Except Trumpkins might have to worry about Trump’s failure to govern. |
Trump freaking out on Twitter today!
![]() |
Unless you win. Then you President then you are immune from suit and hot away with it! |