I wish people who are playing up the CHIPS Act had any knowledge of the actual impacts. You sound like a DC bureaucrat when you do this. - someone actually in the industry. |
do some research, it’s not my job. You are just choosing to ignore all the points made. The current administration is a total disaster. |
Sure, but that was 2 years too late. |
This is not about Trump v Dems. This is about dem failures that have gotten us to this point, and saying the danger posed by Trump is a reason to vote D, despite their inability to listen to voters. Here’s an idea: come up with a real platform that voters want. What we’ve got now is not a good enough reason to vote D. |
I am not a low information voter. Parroting DNC talking points is not going to sway me. If you don’t see how Harris couldn’t differentiate herself from an unpopular president, then I’m not sure what to tell you. I am not giving you a list. Look at all the polling from 2022-2024 if you’re confused. Listen to Ezra Klein: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/09/opinion/musk-trump-doge-abundance-agenda.html |
They came up with a platform, see above posts. Whining about this ain’t change anything. The voters chose a person who had no plan, just concepts of a plan. Face facts that many people voted the way they did out of hatred and not perhaps in their own best self interests. |
Why doesn't the GOP ask Trump to sign the same bill? We are now five years "too late" and other than the performative BS related to this administration, still nothing has changed. |
The border is shut? Really? Please show how or where the border is shut. |
She had her own policies and they were and are very popular, and certainly more popular than tanking our economy and abandoning NATO to support Russia. |
They had a bi-partisan bill that was written by the most conservative senator on the issue and it had 80% of what the GOP wanted and Trump killed it. It needed 60 votes. Why wouldn't ten GOP senators vote for it? |
[list]
They ignored the problem for 2 years. That was too little too late. They could have come up with an actual plan and engaged in leadership. It’s not like voters didn’t make their opinions known. |
Let me get this straight- they killed the bipartisan solution because it was too late? That’s like burning your house down because it got too messy. No, they thought it was better for them to keep the problem alive so they could juice their base, who don’t have much between their ears and never leave their Fox bubble long enough to form an independent thought. And it was very effective, wasn’t it? Because you’re still on here saying it’s better to have chaos and a legal system in shambles. Pathetic. |
The bi-partisan bill you are referring to was more of a band-aid bill than a long term solution but it absolutely shouldn't have failed for the political reason that it did. That bill was on the table at least two years too late due to political games on one side of the aisle and it failed due to political games on the other side of the aisle. Disgraceful from every angle! |
I guess you are forgetting about the little law that the courts overturned thus denying Biden the same tools that Trump had. Some presidents obey the law. |
Oh I am not confused. Kamala could have gone door to door and talked to every single voter and handed out a syllabus outlining her entire plan. At the end of the day it would not make a difference to many voters as they would never vote for a woman and/or a person of color. |