Woman missing after reporting seeing a toddler on the highway

[Anonymous]

It is kind of sad that she could have compromised her nursing career. I hope that’s not the case.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Theory from Reddit

"Carlee planned to party with some friends over the weekend which included a new guy she met online. Carlee would eventually meet him on the side of the express way, ditched her vehicle as well as her belongings, got into a grey sedan with this mystery guy and ended up at the Red Roof partying with a group of people.

The Red Roof manager noticed Carlee as one of the people in the group and alerted the police. Carlee and the mystery man left the Red Roof soon after and a nearby doorbell camera spotted Carlee getting dropped off around the block from her home shortly before arriving back home. (Allegedly)

An alleged person who was with her posted a comment on a video stating that Carlee is going to state she had a mental breakdown and that she was wandering around for 2 days.

This is just what the streets are saying. Y’all think it’s true?"

This seems plausible. Obviously, there was no toddler, so she either hallucinated that or just made it up. Which is pretty messed up, so I hope she was having some kind of lapse in judgement.

It’s not “obvious” there was “no toddler”.

Uh yeah it is. Otherwise the police would still be looking for this wandering toddler. They obviously don’t believe there was a toddler wandering down the highway.

Unless you work for the Hoover police department, you’re guessing. It’s ok to admit you don’t know everything.

NP. This happens on ALL of these threads. People create these crazy narratives as if they have some special insight - mostly just to trash people. It's disgusting.

There’s no special insight being claimed. It’s just pretty obvious there was no toddler on the side of the road. Except apparently to you.

Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.

NP. If you still think there was ever a toddler involved, you don’t get to question anyone else’s critical thinking skills.

I'm not the one speculating based on limited information.

Disgusting how some people are so quick to make up these false narratives about someone based on almost no real information.

Is it “disgusting” to infer that there was never a toddler on the side of the road based on the updated information and the fact that the police are not searching for the toddler in question, or are you just feeling salty about being wrong and digging in your heels?

I'm not wrong because I wasn't making up random BS about what happened.

It's disgusting to trash her. Especially when you don't have any details about what happened.

It’s not trashing her to say there was no toddler. What do you not understand about that?

Sure it is. You have no facts.

It’s a fact that the police are not searching for a toddler, and have not mentioned finding a toddler, safe or otherwise. But keep digging in, I’m sure you’re right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe people claiming that she would intentionally make this up. She is a 25 year old trying to get a nursing license, not a 16 year old. I don't know what happened, but if what she said was not true, I strongly believe it was due to a mental health issue/break rather than intentional falsehood.

Because most of the speculators are drama queens themselves projecting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Theory from Reddit

"Carlee planned to party with some friends over the weekend which included a new guy she met online. Carlee would eventually meet him on the side of the express way, ditched her vehicle as well as her belongings, got into a grey sedan with this mystery guy and ended up at the Red Roof partying with a group of people.

The Red Roof manager noticed Carlee as one of the people in the group and alerted the police. Carlee and the mystery man left the Red Roof soon after and a nearby doorbell camera spotted Carlee getting dropped off around the block from her home shortly before arriving back home. (Allegedly)

An alleged person who was with her posted a comment on a video stating that Carlee is going to state she had a mental breakdown and that she was wandering around for 2 days.

This is just what the streets are saying. Y’all think it’s true?"

This seems plausible. Obviously, there was no toddler, so she either hallucinated that or just made it up. Which is pretty messed up, so I hope she was having some kind of lapse in judgement.

It’s not “obvious” there was “no toddler”.

Uh yeah it is. Otherwise the police would still be looking for this wandering toddler. They obviously don’t believe there was a toddler wandering down the highway.

Unless you work for the Hoover police department, you’re guessing. It’s ok to admit you don’t know everything.

NP. This happens on ALL of these threads. People create these crazy narratives as if they have some special insight - mostly just to trash people. It's disgusting.

There’s no special insight being claimed. It’s just pretty obvious there was no toddler on the side of the road. Except apparently to you.

Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.

NP. If you still think there was ever a toddler involved, you don’t get to question anyone else’s critical thinking skills.

I'm not the one speculating based on limited information.

Disgusting how some people are so quick to make up these false narratives about someone based on almost no real information.

Is it “disgusting” to infer that there was never a toddler on the side of the road based on the updated information and the fact that the police are not searching for the toddler in question, or are you just feeling salty about being wrong and digging in your heels?

I'm not wrong because I wasn't making up random BS about what happened.

It's disgusting to trash her. Especially when you don't have any details about what happened.

It’s not trashing her to say there was no toddler. What do you not understand about that?

Sure it is. You have no facts.

It’s a fact that the police are not searching for a toddler, and have not mentioned finding a toddler, safe or otherwise. But keep digging in, I’m sure you’re right.

You are assuming you have all of the details from the police. You don't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is kind of sad that she could have compromised her nursing career. I hope that’s not the case.

Plenty of people have mental health problems.

[Anonymous]

UFO abduction.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Theory from Reddit

"Carlee planned to party with some friends over the weekend which included a new guy she met online. Carlee would eventually meet him on the side of the express way, ditched her vehicle as well as her belongings, got into a grey sedan with this mystery guy and ended up at the Red Roof partying with a group of people.

The Red Roof manager noticed Carlee as one of the people in the group and alerted the police. Carlee and the mystery man left the Red Roof soon after and a nearby doorbell camera spotted Carlee getting dropped off around the block from her home shortly before arriving back home. (Allegedly)

An alleged person who was with her posted a comment on a video stating that Carlee is going to state she had a mental breakdown and that she was wandering around for 2 days.

This is just what the streets are saying. Y’all think it’s true?"

This seems plausible. Obviously, there was no toddler, so she either hallucinated that or just made it up. Which is pretty messed up, so I hope she was having some kind of lapse in judgement.

It’s not “obvious” there was “no toddler”.

Uh yeah it is. Otherwise the police would still be looking for this wandering toddler. They obviously don’t believe there was a toddler wandering down the highway.

Unless you work for the Hoover police department, you’re guessing. It’s ok to admit you don’t know everything.

NP. This happens on ALL of these threads. People create these crazy narratives as if they have some special insight - mostly just to trash people. It's disgusting.

There’s no special insight being claimed. It’s just pretty obvious there was no toddler on the side of the road. Except apparently to you.

Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.

NP. If you still think there was ever a toddler involved, you don’t get to question anyone else’s critical thinking skills.

I'm not the one speculating based on limited information.

Disgusting how some people are so quick to make up these false narratives about someone based on almost no real information.

Is it “disgusting” to infer that there was never a toddler on the side of the road based on the updated information and the fact that the police are not searching for the toddler in question, or are you just feeling salty about being wrong and digging in your heels?

I'm not wrong because I wasn't making up random BS about what happened.

It's disgusting to trash her. Especially when you don't have any details about what happened.

It’s not trashing her to say there was no toddler. What do you not understand about that?

Sure it is. You have no facts.

It’s a fact that the police are not searching for a toddler, and have not mentioned finding a toddler, safe or otherwise. But keep digging in, I’m sure you’re right.

You are assuming you have all of the details from the police. You don't.

So there’s a missing or endangered toddler and the police are just sitting on that information? They found the toddler but are not mentioning it? Come on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Theory from Reddit

"Carlee planned to party with some friends over the weekend which included a new guy she met online. Carlee would eventually meet him on the side of the express way, ditched her vehicle as well as her belongings, got into a grey sedan with this mystery guy and ended up at the Red Roof partying with a group of people.

The Red Roof manager noticed Carlee as one of the people in the group and alerted the police. Carlee and the mystery man left the Red Roof soon after and a nearby doorbell camera spotted Carlee getting dropped off around the block from her home shortly before arriving back home. (Allegedly)

An alleged person who was with her posted a comment on a video stating that Carlee is going to state she had a mental breakdown and that she was wandering around for 2 days.

This is just what the streets are saying. Y’all think it’s true?"

This seems plausible. Obviously, there was no toddler, so she either hallucinated that or just made it up. Which is pretty messed up, so I hope she was having some kind of lapse in judgement.

It’s not “obvious” there was “no toddler”.

Uh yeah it is. Otherwise the police would still be looking for this wandering toddler. They obviously don’t believe there was a toddler wandering down the highway.

Unless you work for the Hoover police department, you’re guessing. It’s ok to admit you don’t know everything.

NP. This happens on ALL of these threads. People create these crazy narratives as if they have some special insight - mostly just to trash people. It's disgusting.

There’s no special insight being claimed. It’s just pretty obvious there was no toddler on the side of the road. Except apparently to you.

Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.

NP. If you still think there was ever a toddler involved, you don’t get to question anyone else’s critical thinking skills.

I'm not the one speculating based on limited information.

Disgusting how some people are so quick to make up these false narratives about someone based on almost no real information.

Is it “disgusting” to infer that there was never a toddler on the side of the road based on the updated information and the fact that the police are not searching for the toddler in question, or are you just feeling salty about being wrong and digging in your heels?

I'm not wrong because I wasn't making up random BS about what happened.

It's disgusting to trash her. Especially when you don't have any details about what happened.

It’s not trashing her to say there was no toddler. What do you not understand about that?

Sure it is. You have no facts.

It’s a fact that the police are not searching for a toddler, and have not mentioned finding a toddler, safe or otherwise. But keep digging in, I’m sure you’re right.

You are assuming you have all of the details from the police. You don't.

So there’s a missing or endangered toddler and the police are just sitting on that information? They found the toddler but are not mentioning it? Come on.

I would think they'd be warning the community there's a kidnapper at large! Unless they're keeping it close to the vest, but this doesn't seem likely based on the decidedly non-urgent tone of their messaging.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Theory from Reddit

"Carlee planned to party with some friends over the weekend which included a new guy she met online. Carlee would eventually meet him on the side of the express way, ditched her vehicle as well as her belongings, got into a grey sedan with this mystery guy and ended up at the Red Roof partying with a group of people.

The Red Roof manager noticed Carlee as one of the people in the group and alerted the police. Carlee and the mystery man left the Red Roof soon after and a nearby doorbell camera spotted Carlee getting dropped off around the block from her home shortly before arriving back home. (Allegedly)

An alleged person who was with her posted a comment on a video stating that Carlee is going to state she had a mental breakdown and that she was wandering around for 2 days.

This is just what the streets are saying. Y’all think it’s true?"

This seems plausible. Obviously, there was no toddler, so she either hallucinated that or just made it up. Which is pretty messed up, so I hope she was having some kind of lapse in judgement.

It’s not “obvious” there was “no toddler”.

Uh yeah it is. Otherwise the police would still be looking for this wandering toddler. They obviously don’t believe there was a toddler wandering down the highway.

Unless you work for the Hoover police department, you’re guessing. It’s ok to admit you don’t know everything.

NP. This happens on ALL of these threads. People create these crazy narratives as if they have some special insight - mostly just to trash people. It's disgusting.

There’s no special insight being claimed. It’s just pretty obvious there was no toddler on the side of the road. Except apparently to you.

Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.

NP. If you still think there was ever a toddler involved, you don’t get to question anyone else’s critical thinking skills.

I'm not the one speculating based on limited information.

Disgusting how some people are so quick to make up these false narratives about someone based on almost no real information.

Is it “disgusting” to infer that there was never a toddler on the side of the road based on the updated information and the fact that the police are not searching for the toddler in question, or are you just feeling salty about being wrong and digging in your heels?

I'm not wrong because I wasn't making up random BS about what happened.

It's disgusting to trash her. Especially when you don't have any details about what happened.

It’s not trashing her to say there was no toddler. What do you not understand about that?

Sure it is. You have no facts.

It’s a fact that the police are not searching for a toddler, and have not mentioned finding a toddler, safe or otherwise. But keep digging in, I’m sure you’re right.

You are assuming you have all of the details from the police. You don't.

So there’s a missing or endangered toddler and the police are just sitting on that information? They found the toddler but are not mentioning it? Come on.

We don't have the facts. There may have been a toddler there but unrelated to her disappearance. If the kid is fine then no need to report on it.

It's OK not to know.

It's not OK to assume she was lying or is mentally ill.

[Anonymous]

She should be put on trial for false kidnapping and required to pay back the tax dollars, what a awful woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Theory from Reddit

"Carlee planned to party with some friends over the weekend which included a new guy she met online. Carlee would eventually meet him on the side of the express way, ditched her vehicle as well as her belongings, got into a grey sedan with this mystery guy and ended up at the Red Roof partying with a group of people.

The Red Roof manager noticed Carlee as one of the people in the group and alerted the police. Carlee and the mystery man left the Red Roof soon after and a nearby doorbell camera spotted Carlee getting dropped off around the block from her home shortly before arriving back home. (Allegedly)

An alleged person who was with her posted a comment on a video stating that Carlee is going to state she had a mental breakdown and that she was wandering around for 2 days.

This is just what the streets are saying. Y’all think it’s true?"

This seems plausible. Obviously, there was no toddler, so she either hallucinated that or just made it up. Which is pretty messed up, so I hope she was having some kind of lapse in judgement.

It’s not “obvious” there was “no toddler”.

Uh yeah it is. Otherwise the police would still be looking for this wandering toddler. They obviously don’t believe there was a toddler wandering down the highway.

Unless you work for the Hoover police department, you’re guessing. It’s ok to admit you don’t know everything.

NP. This happens on ALL of these threads. People create these crazy narratives as if they have some special insight - mostly just to trash people. It's disgusting.

There’s no special insight being claimed. It’s just pretty obvious there was no toddler on the side of the road. Except apparently to you.

Be sure you figure it out, you online detective with no critical thinking skills.

NP. If you still think there was ever a toddler involved, you don’t get to question anyone else’s critical thinking skills.

I'm not the one speculating based on limited information.

Disgusting how some people are so quick to make up these false narratives about someone based on almost no real information.

Is it “disgusting” to infer that there was never a toddler on the side of the road based on the updated information and the fact that the police are not searching for the toddler in question, or are you just feeling salty about being wrong and digging in your heels?

I'm not wrong because I wasn't making up random BS about what happened.

It's disgusting to trash her. Especially when you don't have any details about what happened.

It’s not trashing her to say there was no toddler. What do you not understand about that?

Sure it is. You have no facts.

It’s a fact that the police are not searching for a toddler, and have not mentioned finding a toddler, safe or otherwise. But keep digging in, I’m sure you’re right.

You are assuming you have all of the details from the police. You don't.

So there’s a missing or endangered toddler and the police are just sitting on that information? They found the toddler but are not mentioning it? Come on.

I would think they'd be warning the community there's a kidnapper at large! Unless they're keeping it close to the vest, but this doesn't seem likely based on the decidedly non-urgent tone of their messaging.

If an arrest is imminent, they could potentially keep any pertinent info quiet so as not to endanger its success. I'm skeptical, but it's a very strange story, so we'll see.

[Anonymous]

https://www.wvtm13.com/amp/article/carlee-russell-alabama-missing-found/44554229

[Anonymous]

She returned on foot. According to the link above.

[Anonymous]

I think so many people are obsessed with random trafficking abductions (usually doesn't happen that way) that they also *want* something like this to be true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These are her public Twitter posts, stripped of the retweets (just what she posted OC): https://twitter.com/search?q=(from%3Acarleeenichole)&src=typed_query&f=live

There are several tweets in the last month referencing men who cheat, and then there is a link to a woman telling a man how she would leave him if he cheated on her. "Let me tell you something, you cheat? I'm not even finna be on no rah-dah-dadalala, I'm going to be so player ... I'm going to literally leave in the middle of the night, like a thief in the night. I'm telling you, you gonna come home one day and think everything is g-dd-mn good, and my sh-t is gonna be gone. Youre never gonna be able to locate me." Starts 0:34/1:13

Man, that's eerie. That's from about 5 days before she disappeared.

Wow, this horrible grammar and trying to go to college to be a nurse at 25 what has she been doing for the last 7 years, makes you wonder what the real story is with her mental health!! with this recent mental health episode she shouldn't be working near anyone let alone in care of others as a nurse. This should be noted and barr her from health care jobs.