Western High School Boundary Map options (A/B/C/D)

[Anonymous]

Feedback so far: Scenario 2 is the least hated plan.

[Anonymous]

I like how the facilitators of the Zoom breakout rooms are just saying what they personally want instead of what the whole group discussed, lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feedback so far: Scenario 2 is the least hated plan.

Least hated drafty draft?

[Anonymous]

Lots of Lees Corner parents representing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Feedback so far: Scenario 2 is the least hated plan.

For high school. Middle school map has issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Lees Corner parents representing.

Good for them!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Lees Corner parents representing.

As usual, the less resources people in Centerville will get screwed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feedback so far: Scenario 2 is the least hated plan.

Least hated drafty draft?

Scenario 2 is basically the drafty draft Option B.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shitshow so far of live polls that aren’t working. Some planning dude from nowhere around here intro-ing. No questions or answers so far.

Strongly suggest everyone look at the pics of the people who developed the boundary lines. None looked like they had any knowledge of FCPS. Several were very young. My guess: this was a video game puzzle to them and no understanding of what the result would be.

WXY Studio was the firm they used. Never heard of them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shitshow so far of live polls that aren’t working. Some planning dude from nowhere around here intro-ing. No questions or answers so far.

Strongly suggest everyone look at the pics of the people who developed the boundary lines. None looked like they had any knowledge of FCPS. Several were very young. My guess: this was a video game puzzle to them and no understanding of what the result would be.

Well put them in then

WXY Studio was the firm they used. Never heard of them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shitshow so far of live polls that aren’t working. Some planning dude from nowhere around here intro-ing. No questions or answers so far.

Strongly suggest everyone look at the pics of the people who developed the boundary lines. None looked like they had any knowledge of FCPS. Several were very young. My guess: this was a video game puzzle to them and no understanding of what the result would be.

WXY Studio was the firm they used. Never heard of them

Unpopular opinion: I think they are much better than Thru. Three different scenarios for three different goals make sense to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oakton will fall so hard in rankings if scenario 3 goes through. Talk about a brain drain.

Literally, no one cares.

You don’t think the school board cares that a top 10 Virginia school will lose their high performance feeder schools? Think again.

Navy and Crossfield have smart kids but they're no smarter than everyone else at Oakton. No brain drain, sweeties. You're far too full of yourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Feedback so far: Scenario 2 is the least hated plan.

For high school. Middle school map has issues.

Tons of issuss. Besides those already mentioned, it moves kids from Dogwood and Hunter Woods from Hughes to Carson.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Scenario 2 has Oakton at 103 percent and SLHS only at 83 percent. Seems unbalanced. Maybe they need to move Crossfield over to SLHS.

This is 100% what is coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Shitshow so far of live polls that aren’t working. Some planning dude from nowhere around here intro-ing. No questions or answers so far.

Strongly suggest everyone look at the pics of the people who developed the boundary lines. None looked like they had any knowledge of FCPS. Several were very young. My guess: this was a video game puzzle to them and no understanding of what the result would be.

WXY Studio was the firm they used. Never heard of them

Unpopular opinion: I think they are much better than Thru. Three different scenarios for three different goals make sense to me.

The bar is very low when it comes to being better than Thru.

If you want to see what greater transparency looks like, look at the recent summaries that MCPS circulated relating to the reopening of Woodward HS and the opening of a new Wootton HS at the new Crown HS. There were lots of objections to what the MCPS Board of Education approved but the amount of data and transparency in the MCPS documents far exceeds any of the crap that FCPS has been cranking out. Reid should be embarrassed by just how incompetent her staff looks compared to MCPS.