Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
You think someone called the Guardian and said they knew the shooter and the Guardian didn’t make sure the source was legitimate? |
Sure lets trust them, shall we? |
Is the grandmother lying as well? |
Do you think journalists don’t verify their sources as credible before publishing a news story? Why don’t you call CNN with your groyper theory and get it published? All you gotta do is contact a reporter and they will take down your theory and publish it immediately, right? |
Try again his grandmother says Tyler Robinson, the prime suspect for Charlie Kirk’s assassination, comes from a proud MAGA family, according to his grandmother. “Proud maga” Gee wiz morons he was raised by violent maga white Christian make raised in a house of idiots |
| The shooter followed Laura Loomer on X. But sure, he was a leftist. |
All they could make sure of, in this quick turnaround moment, is that the person went to the same high school as the shooter. How on earth could the Guardian make sure that the classmate is still in touch with Tyler, or even was telling the truth about his political leanings? That's not verifiable information. |
| What we need is an objective leader, someone who is not swayed or influenced by either side. This is our only way out of this mess. Block out the noise and take control. Maybe this shooter was trying to prove a point, Kirk mentioned collateral damage from guns, fitting now that he is one of the thousands of victims of gun violence. |
If you went to high school with a shooter? Pretty much. The Guardian isn't exactly the New York Times. |
There you go, getting emotional. Have a cup of tea and a Midol. |
Fuentes has never called Charlie a fascist. Nobody on the far right would use that term as a pejorative against someone who they think isn’t sufficiently right wing. That makes no sense. |
Who cares what the shooter was trying to do. They did it the wrong way. They are out of our society now and will likely be put to death. |
They can verify if the witness knew the shooter and went to school with him. They cannot verify that what he is saying about the shooter is true. That is why the witness and his statement itself is the "news", not that oh wow we now resllt know the shooter's political thoughts. We don't. And everyone is forgetting the shooter is still alive, with a voice. |
So why do you trust anonymous sources about Trump? |