Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
I completely condemn the shooting of Charlie Kirk. I would ask you what you find written by or spoken by Melissa Hortman or her spouse that advocated hateful attitudes that are in any way commensurate with the kinds of things Charlie Kirk said. No one deserves to be murdered for things they say. People can be held accountable socially for things they say. They can be disliked for things they say. People who are hateful and spread hate are generally not mourned. No one is obligated to lionize any person who is a lousy person, even when they are dead. Meanwhile, I would like to see your condemnation in kind for every single GOP political leader, including POTUS, and every single RW political commentator or every single RW person on social media who made unfounded accusations and CALLED FOR RETRIBUTION AND VIOLANCE against all people on the "left" and Democrats over these past few days and who made fun of or light of the attack on Paul Pelosi, etc. etc. No, both sides are not the same. One side's leadership consistently calls for efforts to address gun violence and mental health issues and the other shuts it down every time. One side values guns and money more than people. Your hypocrisy is loud and clear. Get off your soapbox. |
White men are too impulsive and emotional? What are the excuses for everyone else who commits murder? The internet perpetuates these shootings and almost glorifies these shooters. We need to stop discussing the why and how and f’ing change something. |
It’s so typical that liberals - who constantly cite the Guardian to defend their narrative - call it out when it fails to do so. Same with Fox News. They cite it when it’s useful to them and trash it when it’s not. |
Democrats do not trust every anonymous source. The source--if a liar trying to shape narrative--would indeed go to a left leaning paper to establish credibility |
Apparently everyone is far too brainwashed to see the larger picture. |
I, and many leftists, think Trump is fascist. It's really pretty obvious that he is. I don't support violence against Trump, Charlie Kirk, Venezuelan people in boats, Gazans, or anyone really. The shooter thought Charlie Kirk was fascist. Because he was a follower of Nick Fuentes and a groyper who was in a small, radicalized online right wing incel crowd. We both use the same word, but have very, very different philosophies. |
| Groypers didn't dislike Charlie because he was a "fascist" (he wasn't). It was because of his Zionist takes. |
I guess, I mean, we aren’t fascists and don’t support fascism. We had a whole war with tanks and planes and stuff. You should catch up on it. Fascinating stuff. |
The reporter would verify they were speaking to a credible person before they published the news story. |
+100000 |
The Guardian published a statement, a testimony. They are reporting what was said by someone. The fact that someone made the statement is news. That does not mean that the statement is true. Newspaper publish what so and so "say" all of the time. |
Give them some time. They'll come around. There will always be a few idiots in every crowd but most of the people participating in this thread are smarter than their rants would lead you to believe. |
The suspect’s grandmother says otherwise. |
Ok newspaperman, what does that mean? |