Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

Are you saying that junkies cannot be abuse victims? Or are you implying that it is okay to abuse junkies, because after all, their junkies and who cares?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A running of list of celebs who liked one of their post-verdict posts:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/johnny-depps-instagram-statement-liked-by-celebrities?d_id=3757244&ref=bffbbuzzfeed&utm_source=dynamic&utm_campaign=bffbbuzzfeed&fbclid=IwAR1BXE-yjF0ny4mME9lDnA8fOSxOzN94mZct_ARdL9hn4KtjYOPFOZndTeI

What stood out for me is Gabby Douglas liking JD's post. She was part of the Me too wave against Larry Nassar. As a true victim of abuse, maybe she doesn't see the verdict as setting the clock back for women and doesn't want AH as their spokesperson?

Why does it have to be all or nothing? Why does Amber heard have to be a "spokesperson" for all domestic abuse victims? I don't understand some of you who think it has to be all or nothing. There WAS abuse. Clearly. It may not have been cut and dry man abuses the woman, but he did threaten her, he did get into physical altercations with her (and yes, so did she against him). Why are you in so much denial? She didn't make it ALL up, you psycho.

Calling someone you disagree with a psycho doesn't really help your case. lol. Her allegations may very well have some truth but she was caught lying under oath many times. That fact alone should disqualify her from being a representative for any cause.

I disagree. And what cause? Loreal? Speaking out against powerful famous men who are dysfunctional and vengeful?

Abuse victims? Speaking out against powerful men who are dysfunctional and vengeful is a fine and dandy cause. The problem is her credibility has been shot for lying on the stand. I don't think any cause would want a liar as their representative.

What about all of *his* lies, which you and many others seem to conveniently overlook? Your double standard is ridiculous.

Well, he has never claimed to be a spokesperson for abuse victims, hasn't he?

He is now the de facto celebrity spokesperson for male “abuse” victims, or something to that effect.

You can remove your childish quotation marks around abuse, as it was clearly delineated in this trial that she abused him.

Or it was a whole lot of DARVO.

Can you say that again in English? I don’t speak Online Adolescent.

DP Deny Attack Reverse into the Victim into an Offender.

[Anonymous]

Looks like the bandwagon rolls forth. White male abuse victims rise up 💪🏻

Kyle Rittenhouse says Johnny Depp's win over Amber Heard is fueling him to get moving on suing the media for defamation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the bandwagon rolls forth. White male abuse victims rise up 💪🏻

Kyle Rittenhouse says Johnny Depp's win over Amber Heard is fueling him to get moving on suing the media for defamation.

Because that makes sense...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

Is this the same person who diagnosed Depp based on his characters on film? If so, he is indeed a joke and he still seeking his 15-minutes of fame by writing that article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

I feel very bad for him and agree with what he says in the article. JD should put forth a statement to his fans that says don’t attack AH or any of the people in the trial. Why would he not, unless he was encouraging it?

JD owe them nothing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

I feel very bad for him and agree with what he says in the article. JD should put forth a statement to his fans that says don’t attack AH or any of the people in the trial. Why would he not, unless he was encouraging it?

JD owe them nothing.

Why does he have to try and control what other people do? The entire trial can be viewed, and people can draw their own conclusions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like the bandwagon rolls forth. White male abuse victims rise up 💪🏻

Kyle Rittenhouse says Johnny Depp's win over Amber Heard is fueling him to get moving on suing the media for defamation.

Don’t see the dots you are trying to connect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

Is this the same person who diagnosed Depp based on his characters on film? If so, he is indeed a joke and he still seeking his 15-minutes of fame by writing that article.

No I think that’s what JD’s lawyers painted him as having done. The Dr was saying he had seen the movies and was observing JD’s processing speed within the movies. Why not? That’s JD’s profession. He might have also seen other JD interviews or depositions, we don’t know. The Dr was denied twice by JD’s lawyers the opportunity to examine JD in person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

Is this the same person who diagnosed Depp based on his characters on film? If so, he is indeed a joke and he still seeking his 15-minutes of fame by writing that article.

Yes and called JD an idiot in his deposition. Interesting he had lunch with Amber. Elaine made such a big deal in court about Dr. Curry bringing muffins when she met with Amber, and having a meal with Johnny and his lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

Is this the same person who diagnosed Depp based on his characters on film? If so, he is indeed a joke and he still seeking his 15-minutes of fame by writing that article.

No I think that’s what JD’s lawyers painted him as having done. The Dr was saying he had seen the movies and was observing JD’s processing speed within the movies. Why not? That’s JD’s profession. He might have also seen other JD interviews or depositions, we don’t know. The Dr was denied twice by JD’s lawyers the opportunity to examine JD in person.

"I'm an expert at this. It's not like I saw one clip of Mr. Depp, and then said, "Oh, let me judge this."" From his article, so he saw many clips of JD and then judged him??

Amber's lawyers should have found a new expert after his deposition. He wasn't prepared for a televised court appearance. The judge had to tell him, "Yes, you have to answer questions." He shouldn't be harassed though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

Is this the same person who diagnosed Depp based on his characters on film? If so, he is indeed a joke and he still seeking his 15-minutes of fame by writing that article.

No I think that’s what JD’s lawyers painted him as having done. The Dr was saying he had seen the movies and was observing JD’s processing speed within the movies. Why not? That’s JD’s profession. He might have also seen other JD interviews or depositions, we don’t know. The Dr was denied twice by JD’s lawyers the opportunity to examine JD in person.

"I'm an expert at this. It's not like I saw one clip of Mr. Depp, and then said, "Oh, let me judge this."" From his article, so he saw many clips of JD and then judged him??

Amber's lawyers should have found a new expert after his deposition. He wasn't prepared for a televised court appearance. The judge had to tell him, "Yes, you have to answer questions." He shouldn't be harassed though.

Agreed he shouldn't be harassed. But this guy broke ethical guidelines for psychiatrists by diagnosing without an evaluation. JD was under no obligation to sit for an evaluation. He didn't make his mental health an issue here. AH did -- she claimed to have PTSD.

And yea, why did the fact that Spiegel had a meal with AH never get brought up?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

I feel very bad for him and agree with what he says in the article. JD should put forth a statement to his fans that says don’t attack AH or any of the people in the trial. Why would he not, unless he was encouraging it?

JD owe them nothing.

DP. You are correct that he doesn’t owe them anything. But a decent person with the kind of platform that he has would make a statement, if for no other reason than to make clear that he doesn’t approve of this behavior and to distance himself from it. If he really cared about cleaning up his reputation, that’s what he would do. Instead, he is implicitly condoning his fans playing out this vindictiveness on his behalf.

He is the one who demanded cameras. He is the one who wanted a media circus. He cannot claim that the foreseeable consequences of that have nothing to do with him. This is exactly what he wanted, for everyone to turn not just on Amber Heard but on everyone associated with her so she would become even more isolated. It’s a continuation of the abuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

Is this the same person who diagnosed Depp based on his characters on film? If so, he is indeed a joke and he still seeking his 15-minutes of fame by writing that article.

No I think that’s what JD’s lawyers painted him as having done. The Dr was saying he had seen the movies and was observing JD’s processing speed within the movies. Why not? That’s JD’s profession. He might have also seen other JD interviews or depositions, we don’t know. The Dr was denied twice by JD’s lawyers the opportunity to examine JD in person.

"I'm an expert at this. It's not like I saw one clip of Mr. Depp, and then said, "Oh, let me judge this."" From his article, so he saw many clips of JD and then judged him??

Amber's lawyers should have found a new expert after his deposition. He wasn't prepared for a televised court appearance. The judge had to tell him, "Yes, you have to answer questions." He shouldn't be harassed though.

Agreed he shouldn't be harassed. But this guy broke ethical guidelines for psychiatrists by diagnosing without an evaluation. JD was under no obligation to sit for an evaluation. He didn't make his mental health an issue here. AH did -- she claimed to have PTSD.

And yea, why did the fact that Spiegel had a meal with AH never get brought up?

If his testimony wasn’t relevant or probative, the judge would have excluded it from trial. She chose not to do so, so clearly she believed the testimony would have some value.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dr. Spiegel speaks: https://www.newsweek.com/i-testified-heard-vs-depp-backlash-horrific-1711386

I never noticed any hate towards him. People treated him more like a joke; not sure if that's worse.
Even his article reads somewhat naif (my dog! :cry

I feel very bad for him and agree with what he says in the article. JD should put forth a statement to his fans that says don’t attack AH or any of the people in the trial. Why would he not, unless he was encouraging it?

JD owe them nothing.

DP. You are correct that he doesn’t owe them anything. But a decent person with the kind of platform that he has would make a statement, if for no other reason than to make clear that he doesn’t approve of this behavior and to distance himself from it. If he really cared about cleaning up his reputation, that’s what he would do. Instead, he is implicitly condoning his fans playing out this vindictiveness on his behalf.

He is the one who demanded cameras. He is the one who wanted a media circus. He cannot claim that the foreseeable consequences of that have nothing to do with him. This is exactly what he wanted, for everyone to turn not just on Amber Heard but on everyone associated with her so she would become even more isolated. It’s a continuation of the abuse.

Yep, he promised her global annihilation for daring to leave him, and he gleefully delivered.